Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

WND EXCLUSIVE
DEMOCRAT CONFIRMS RAMPANT VOTER FRAUD
1st video a stunner, and more expected to be released
Published: 1 day ago
BOB UNRUH
About | Email | Archive
Read
Share Share Share 266
 
Democrats long have labeled voter fraud in the United States a myth or such a rare occurence that it’s not an issue.

But now one of their own has blown the whistle.

Project Veritas and its founder, James O’Keefe, have released an undercover video of Alan Schulkin, the New York Democratic commissioner of the Board of Elections, confirming there is widespread fraud.

In the video, he is heard disclosing that organizers use buses to haul people from poll to poll to vote.

“Yeah, they should ask for your ID. I think there is a lot of voter fraud,” he said in the video that was recorded some months ago.

Inside sources also have revealed that O’Keefe is planning to release more results of his explosive undercover investigation exposing fraud and corruption at the highest levels among operatives close to the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton.

Who REALLY rules America? Stand up against the unelected tyrants in black. Find out how in “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.” Available now at the WND Superstore!

It is rumored that O’Keefe managed to infiltrate the Democrats’ “smoke-filled rooms” with a hidden camera showing their conspiracy to rig the election and other important issues. He plans to release what he found between now and Election Day.

Schuklin’s comments included, “You know, I don’t think it’s too much to ask somebody to show some kind of an ID. … Like I say, people don’t realize, certain neighborhoods in particular they bus people around to vote.”


He blamed New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio for part of the headache.

“He gave out ID cards. De Blasio. That’s in lieu of a driver’s license, but you can use it for anything. But, they didn’t vet people to see who they really are. Anybody can go in there and say I am Joe Smith, I want an ID card. It’s absurd. There’s a lot of fraud. Not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud.”

WND reported in July that activists were gearing up to try to take down voter ID laws before November’s election in states such as Missouri, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Texas and North Dakota.

The most common argument is that voter ID laws would disenfranchise certain groups of people, including racial minorities, the poor and younger voters.

But Daniel Horowitz, a senior editor at Conservative Review, believes the opposition is an example of the left’s tendency to twist the concept of rights in order to grant special privileges to protected classes of individuals at the expense of the rest of the population.

“They’re basically saying that there is a mandate, a right for an individual to vote fraudulently and thereby strip rights away from everyone else,” Horowitz told WND in an interview.

Horowitz details the many ways American voters are being disenfranchised in his new book, “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.” Although he did not discuss voter ID laws in the book, he said attacks on such laws are part of the left-wing effort to disenfranchise Americans who have a legitimate right to vote.

“It ties in to the general sense of them refusing to adopt basic bedrock regulations to illegal immigrants voting, having illegal immigrants come here and getting citizenship for their children,” Horowitz said. “It’s a disenfranchising of the public, diluting what it means to be an American. Diluting the franchise really undercuts the guaranteed liberty that we all have to vote in elections.”

Who REALLY rules America? Stand up against the unelected tyrants in black. Find out how in “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.” Available now at the WND Superstore!

Matthew Vadum, senior vice president at the investigative think tank Capital Research Center, agreed with Horowitz about liberals’ true motive for opposing voter ID.

“It makes it harder for them to cheat,” Vadum told WND. “There’s no rational reason to oppose voter ID requirements.”

Vadum, author of “Subversion, Inc.,” noted even Mexico makes voters get a special ID card to vote. He said he’s not advocating that for the United States, but the requirement in many states that voters show a photo ID to prove they are eligible to vote does not strike him as an unreasonable request.

“Anyone who wouldn’t be willing to prove that isn’t a citizen,” Vadum declared. “They’re trying to commit fraud, either by voting a second or third or fourth or fifth time, or by voting under false pretenses or using someone else’s identity, and so on. Voter ID nips voting fraud in the bud.”

Vadum said there are myriad left-wing pressure groups behind the effort to dismantle voter ID laws, including Project Vote, Demos, People for the American Way, Campaign for America’s Future and all of the ACORN successor groups.

“ACORN itself doesn’t exist anymore, but many of its state organizations have incorporated themselves under new names, like in California, one of the bigger successor groups is Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, or ACCE,” Vadum explained. “So they’re quite active in fighting electoral integrity measures.”

After the 2012 presidential election, WND released its Big List of Vote Fraud Reports, recounting the 59 Philadelphia precincts in which Mitt Romney received zero votes compared to Obama’s 19,605. And the Cleveland precinct in which Obama beat Romney 542 to 0. (Romney received zero votes in nine Cleveland precincts.) And that’s just the beginning.

Among the reports from that election:

The Market Daily News reported on the 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, that on election day gave Romney zero votes while Obama got 99 percent. “In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received two votes or less,” the report said. “One would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there.”

According to Philly.com, 59 voting divisions in Philadelphia produced a “head-spinning figure,” not one vote for Romney. “The unanimous support for Obama in these Philadelphia neighborhoods – clustered in almost exclusively black sections of West and North Philadelphia – fertilizes fears of fraud, despite little hard evidence,” the newspaper said.

A poll watcher told WND up to 10 percent of the ballots cast at a polling station in Pennsylvania reverted to a default, which gave Barack Obama a vote no matter who the voter had selected. The incident took place in the state where officials claimed Obama got a total of 19,605 votes in 59 voting divisions to zero for Mitt Romney and not far from the 100 precincts in Ohio where Obama got 99 percent of the vote, a feat not even achieved by third-world dictators. It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor, Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election Day. He said the software he observed would “change the selection back to default – to Obama.”

MsCentralia

That is not really anything compared to the 14 Republican-held states creating the greatest and most prolific voter fraud ever. By faulty edict and breaking the law.

morcutt Loc: Georgia, United States

This divisiveness is really getting on my nerves. Voter fraud is against the Constitution, essentially constitutes treason, and should be a concern for anyone. Obviously, there is an incentive to bus people around or, as you say commit voter fraud in 14 states, or else no one would do it. Shouldn't we get rid of the incentive to commit activities like this? My recommendation is to start by stopping this dichotomous Democrat vs. Republican shitstorm. You can have differing beliefs or values or ideals than someone else and still work with them. By assuming that anyone who believes opposing ideals to you is intellectually or morally inferior, you kill any debate that could otherwise arise because you can't stand to be wrong or maybe not as correct as you previously thought. This kind of ideological pride will be the death of the United States, as a conscientious lack of debate is what normally kills a Democracy. What use is the free exchange of ideas if there are no ideas being exchanged? What use is having the right to speak your mind if all we do with it is speak hate and emotional garbage instead of speaking logical arguments and intellectually stimulating conversations that could actually get somewhere? If you want an example of how democracy dies with this ideological war we have going on here, Trump versus Clinton. Both sides are at fault for fielding and supporting such heinous candidates to the office of President of the United States. Sure, you might and have every right to favor one. But, realistically, do you honestly think this is the BEST that our 300 million+ population country can offer? The supposedly most economically and most politically advanced nation in the world, the one superpower left, and we field Trump and Clinton. If either one of these losers is elected, the country will become even more divided and basically half of the country won't listen to the person commanding their military and spending their money. Please don't let crap like this continue.

MsCentralia

You nailed it! We the people stop it by not voting for anyone. Like Congress for eight years, Do Nothing! Give not a dime to anyone. No partisan loyalty. No bi-partisan incentives. Let them wither!

morcutt Loc: Georgia, United States

I don't think it's a very practical solution since most Americans that are going to vote will probably still vote. Tell The People to demand better candidates and the parties will have to deliver. The parties are still businesses and if everyone boycotts funding them, then they will be forced to comply. We still have the power here, we just are either too afraid, too uninformed, or too divided to make use of it, which is exactly the climate that the parties strive for. Very few people break the law or do bad things simply because they want to. They do them because there is some incentive, usually money, for them in breaking the law. Remove the incentive for the parties to give us crappy candidates and all of the sudden the Theodore Roosevelts and the Abraham Lincolns will come out of the woodwork. Most of the great men and women here now that would make great Presidents don't run because parties won't support them. But, insert a little change and suddenly....

MsCentralia

Let's try to understand the magnificence of being able to vote. Such a prospect goes against all good sense for those that govern. The people having an actual voice in their rule is madness to those in power. Jim Crow laws here in the US stifled the Black voice. Other regimes throughout the world have put more and more repressive qualifications on voters. Keep making it more and more difficult for every voice to be heard, no matter what your seemingly honest concern, and the Republic will die. 14k elderly Black women who have voted every election for fifty years cannot vote this year due to Republican "safety measures" against so-called "voter fraud." A Republic expands the ability for a citizen to vote, it does not try to make it harder.

okie don

Voting
Let's take a ' what if' look @@
What if our votes were simply POLLS as many have surmised.?
What if the Delegates and ' SUPER DELEGATES ' select who the CEO or the US Inc. CORPORATION will be ?
What if the electronic voting machines are ' rigged'?

Years ago I read something that makes me wonder:
" Who should decide who rules? The unqualified Majority or the qualified Minority".

Just some " crabwise thoughts"

Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I believe that "What if the Delegates and 'Super Delegates' select who the CEO for the US Inc. will be?" Doesn't this already happen, it's not the popular vote that determines who wins, but the Super Delegates? There is no IF here..

moldyoldy

O'keef is famous for fake videos, and the rest of that crap has been proven false a thousand times.

morcutt Loc: Georgia, United States

To be fair, it is in the Constitution that the popular vote is merely a recommendation to the Electoral College, who ultimately decide the winner.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Won't work. It requires universal cooperation among voters. Do you see that happening? If you refuse to vote you should have nothing to say pro or con regarding politics or its outcome.

I agree the rhetoric is over the top but it is due to the passion of the people talking. We see the two candidates slinging mud at each other and that sets the stage here and elsewhere.

I posted this article in direct response to talk here saying voter fraud is a lie and the huge majority of that talk is from the left.

Voter fraud does exist and on a much larger scale than.previously thought.

Why does it rankle me so? Because posturing does nothing. All the talk here is just talk. I believe if one has strength of conviction, one puts up or shuts up. Puts his money where his mouth is.

To that end I purchased 6 used 15 passenger vans. I pay out of my.pocket the license, registration, gasoline, maintenance, insurances, and 5 drivers. I had set a goal of transporting 500 voters to the polls. At this time there are 963 people signed up to vote who otherwise would have no way to get there and back. By election day there will be more than 1,000 on my list.

I did this because I feel America is at a crossroad. I am doing what I can to assist people to speak.

I absolutely resent the fact that voter fraud can negate my legal efforts to see my choice elected. Why my choice is my choice, is my business. The fact is that I do not believe anyone should want our next president chosen by people who voted against our laws and in my opinion, anyone who disagrees with me on this is not worthy of being called an Anerican.

If you want to see decent people have a chance to gain high office, concentrate on getting big money out of politics. Until we can legally put a stop to big money buying political positioning, we will not see true public servants on our ballots..

morcutt Loc: Georgia, United States

I absolutely applaud what you are doing. My only reaction to having read that was, "Damn straight." Damn straight, we need civil servants and not politicians

mouset783 Loc: Oklahoma

It is not necessary to remind us you adore the lesbian bags behind.75 times is plenty