ldsuttonjr wrote:
If someone told you that they were against the act of stealing, what question would you ask them? If you were a Liberal, youd ask: Why do you think some people steal? Then, when the person being asked the question stumblesbecause maybe theyre not prepared, or are just a bit dimyoud gloat in their inability to quickly articulate an answer. But does their inability to articulate an answer make their position against stealing any less relevant? Does it suddenly make the act of stealing morally acceptable? The obvious answer is no, but youd be hard pressed to find a Liberal with that slant when it comes to abortion.
Hypotheticals regarding the motives behind an act dont make the nature of that act irrelevant. No matter the motive behind the act, the question remains: is the act itself moral, or is it not?
If ever you come across a Liberal who attempts to argue by peppering you with irrelevant questionsthey all do this, by the waydont be intimidated. Take a stand, and call them out. Identify the fallacy, and youve won half the battle.
by Frank Camp
If someone told you that they were against the act... (
show quote)
"Now the word of the Lord came to me saying,
'Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
And before you were born I consecrated you;
I have appointed you a prophet to the nations.'"
Jeremiah 1:5
The words of Jeremiah [the prophet], the son of Hilkiah, of the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin, to whom the word of the Lord came in the days of Josiah, the son of Amon,king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign. It came also in the days of Jehoiakim, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, until the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, until the exile of Jerusalem in the fifth month.
"Now the word of the Lord came to me saying, 'Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, And before you were born I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations.'"
"Do not be afraid of them, For I am with you to deliver you," declares the Lord. Then the Lord stretched out His hand and touched my mouth, and the Lord said to me, "Behold, I have put My words in your mouth." Jeremiah 1:1-5,8-9
"Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.
If you say, "But we knew nothing about this," does not He who weighs the heart perceive it?
Does not He who guards your life now know it? Will He not repay each person according to what he has done?" Proverbs 24:11-12.
Since Roe vs Wade - abortion was legalized, in 1973, fifty five million babies (55,000,000) have perished. That number is 1/6 th of the United States population.
There are 4,000 abortions daily in the United States, almost one and one/half million annually.
Following are excerpts from: Pro Life Answers to Pro Choice Arguments, by Randy Alcorn:
"It is uncertain when human life begins; that is a religious question that cannot be answered by science." If there is uncertainty about when human life begins, the benefit of the doubt should go to preserving life.
Medical textbooks and scientific reference works consistently agree that human life begins at conception.
Some of the world's most prominent scientists and physicians testified to a U.S. Senate committee that human life begins at conception.
Many other prominent scientists and physicians have likewise affirmed with certainty that human life begins at conception.
"The fetus is just a part of the pregnant woman's body, like her tonsils or appendix." A body part is defined by the common genetic code it shares with the rest of its body; the unborn's genetic code, his/her DNA differs from the mother's.
The child may die, and the mother live, or the mother may die, and the child live, proving they are two separate individuals.
The unborn child takes an active role in his own development, controlling the course of the pregnancy, and the time of birth.
Being inside something is not the same as being part of something.
Human beings should not be discriminated against because of their place of residence.
"Every woman has the right to choose. It would be unfair to restrict a woman's choice by prohibiting abortion." Any civilized society restricts the individual's freedom to choose whenever that choice would harm an innocent person.
"Freedom to choose" is too vague for meaningful discussion; we must always ask, "Freedom to choose what?"
People who are pro-choice about abortion are often not pro-choice about other issues with less at stake.
The one-time choice of abortion robs someone else of a life-time of choices and prevents him from ever exercising his rights.
Everyone is pro-choice when it comes to the choices prior to pregnancy and after birth.
Nearly all violations of human rights have been defended on the grounds of the right to choose.
"Every woman should have control over her own body. Reproductive freedom is a basic right." Abortion assures that 750,000 females each year do not have control over their bodies.
Not all things done with a person's body are right, nor should they all be legally protected.
Pro-lifers consistently affirm true reproductive rights.
Even pro-choicers must acknowledge that the "right to control one's body" argument has no validity if the unborn is a human being.
Too often "the right to control my life" becomes the right to hurt and oppress others for my own advantage.
Control over the body can be exercised to prevent pregnancy in the first place.
It is demeaning to a woman's body and self-esteem to regard pregnancy as an unnatural, negative, and "out-of-control" condition.
A picture of a 6 week old human embryo
In the human embryo, the heart begins beating between the 18th and 25th day. The foundation of the entire nervous system is complete by 3 weeks. At 6 weeks, the skeleton is complete and reflexes are present. Electrical brain waves are recorded at 6 weeks. The brain and all the body systems are present by 8 weeks. The photo of a 6 week old human embryo, shown below actual size, was taken after surgery for an unruptured ectopic pregnancy, at the University of Minnesota by a medical photographer in 1972.