usewillow

If after reading this you still want Clinton you are beyond help and this country is doomed to fall.

OK then let’s take a reason that was and is a disqualification to hold office. Take a close look at the use of the word “or” as used in the code.
She might not be eligible to be elected president when everybody gets finished. Look at this, 18 US Code 107:
“Concealment, Removal, or Mutilation Generally: Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. …and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” …and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office…”
First H. Clinton did cause to be placed on her private computer files that were considered work related. This amounts to removal and is unlawful under the regulations of the office. Next she caused to have thousands of files removed (destroyed) from the computer by her staff and her attorney. These people were not cleared to see the work related files in the computer. It is a fact some were classified…By virtue of her job she either knew or should have known this was illegal. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking that law. (Note: how many people are in jail because of that ignorance law?)
Now to look at the law a bit closer, in the first part of this quoted law we find each section is separated by the word “or” this means each part is a different violation. Mr. Comey put them all together as one and recommended nothing be done because of intent. BUT, look at the law and intent is not mentioned in the first violation. (Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates,. or… in any public office…shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” …and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office…” From me…maybe the term “his” and reference to males is why she should not be guilty. She claims to be a woman and as such she deserves special treatment.

One thing Clinton is now claiming is everything on her computer was hers and nothing was or is owned by the government.
Here are some things Judicial Watch is doing…
What is notable is that the State Department finally admits that Clinton’s practice of supposedly emailing other State officials using her non-state.gov account was not an “appropriate method of preserving federal records or making them available for searches under FOIA.”
Second, it is both significant and disturbing that Hillary Clinton now asserts a private “claim of right” over her non-state.gov email account, including any of the 55,000 pages of federal records she returned to the State Department. She further claims that these and other emails, including emails that may have contained classified information, have “never been the property of or in the possession or control of the State Department.”
Also important is the difference between the State Department’s and Mrs. Clinton’s most fundamental claims as to why neither agency staff nor Mrs. Clinton should testify.
The State Department claims that no one at the agency really knew anything about Mrs. Clinton’s non-state.gov email system, so there is nothing left to say.
Mrs. Clinton, on the other hand, claims that everyone at the agency knew all about her non-state.gov system, so, once again, there is nothing left to say.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

SCOTUS is the least of our worries. The court doesn't deal with foreign dignitaries or foreign policy - and the Congress ultimately decides what the country looks like, not the President. What programs are active or deleted, and the size of the Government, are the purview of the Congress as well - and Trump would piss off every member, guaranteed, including those from his own (alleged ) party.

robmull Loc: florida

After the Revolutionary War, jim, General George Washington wanted to go back to his farm and relax. No problem. "The Donald," could have certainly gone back to any number of his farms, in any number of countries, to enjoy the spoils of his creations. Instead, like General George, Mr. Trump saw that there was something more he HAD to do for his country, and got into the depths of political mud-slinging that were many times more frustrating than having to slaughter and hang soldiers for being on the wrong side. Sometimes against the advice and desire of his troops. Mr. Trump is doing the same as General Washington, as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure that Mr. Trump's Military High School didn't compare to the General's hard-core battle experience, but the political dirt is even dirtier with the radical communist elements in THIS battle!!! Hummmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

When considering the alternative (Hillary) it's a no brainer. That someone as crooked and dishonest as Hillary is even a consideration is a testament to how far America has fallen.

The new TV series, "Sole Survivor" is intriguing.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

All governments, and the countries they represent are out for their own interests. They don't give a damn about the worker ants they represent.

I will take my chances with Trump over Hillary any day. I know that he doesn't care about me. Hillary cares less if that is possible. We are hosed either way.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Yep! You are right!

My wife bought the "House of Cards" series on DVD, and watching them is kind of creepy. It is probably just like what our government does. Reminds me of the Clintons. Body count, and all!

greeneyes2

The Bush family won't vote for Trump because he embarrassed Jeb in the debates. I still can't believe he had his "mommy" come on stage and defend him! Bill smiles and continues to lie his way into a fortune. Obama favors Islam. Carter is one of our WORST presidents. They are ALL jealous of the outsider Trump. Trump was declared correct when he said his microphone was not working correctly during the first debate. I, a White, heterosexual, female will definitely vote for Trump!!

Headsup

The photos say it all. Now everyone knows why we're in such a mess!!!!

vernon

there is not a decent president in the bunch.they all play for money and are afraid that trump will break up their playhouse .

Airforceone

Amazing when you sit back and think about it. I would have to say that these 5 guys know what it's like to run this country. They know that ideology on most issues is different. But when you give someone the Oval Office it comes with immense responsibility. We all know Trump does not have the temperament nor the character to occupy that office on Defence issues. He had an ideology on running the economy, immigration, and our social issues and that's fine.

usewillow

Would you prefer someone that would and has sold out to the highest bidder? OK! For those who will take an active stand against Mrs. H. Clinton, first read this post to decide if you agree. If you do not agree then do nothing, but if you agree then copy this and demand your Representatives do something about it.

This law, 18 US Code 2071 (b), is the law Mrs. H. Clinton violated while holding office as the United States Secretary of State. Here is the reading of the appropriate code section:

(b)
“Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

The whole paragraph has compound sentences: "The structure of a compound sentence sends certain messages to readers, no matter how you fill in the blanks. First, it tells readers that the sentence contains two relatively important ideas, each one deserving its own independent clause. Second, it tells readers that these two ideas are approximately equal in importance, since they are balanced as a pair. And third, it alerts readers to the relationship between the two ideas, depending on the connector. For example, and suggests that the two ideas are being added together, but indicates that they are being contrasted, and or tells us that they are alternatives. A semicolon suggests balance between two similar or sharply contrasting statements."

By following the rules of punctuation we can easily and accurately settle on the things she willfully did.

First Mrs. Clinton did have custody of records, documents or other things (electronic documents). Next she did willfully and unlawfully conceal or destroy the same.
So let’s break this down to her (Mrs. Clinton’s) actual actions pertaining to files that were considered work related. Mrs. Clinton did willfully and unlawfully initiate work related documents to be placed on her private computer. Mrs. Clinton did willfully and unlawfully allow work related documents to be removed or destroyed from her private computer. We could proceed further, however those two actions alone fulfill the requirements to be prosecuted under the law as shown in this document. Even if Mrs. Clinton is not fined under this title (18 US Code 2071 (b) or imprisoned, she is still disqualified (if found guilty) to hold any office under the United States as per the cited US Code. However, Mrs. Clinton has admitted and the FBI has stated she did in fact do these actions. You should take notice that “intent” is not mentioned in this section of the Code.

Any person with the knowledge of and the authority to take legal action to implement this US Code against Mrs. H. Clinton and does not do so is guilty of dereliction of duty. If the legal action allowed and demanded by this US Code is not taken in a timely manner then action could be implied as “election tampering” which would give the President reason to intervene on behalf of Mrs. Clinton. A pardon usually cannot take place unless the person is first convicted of a federal crime but the President may have other options.

If I as a lay person can find this then the FBI cannot ignore the facts. There is nothing in the law that demands there to be or have been a consideration of intent. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. We have all heard that and many have had that applied to their actions and went to jail over.

fredlott63

3 democrats and 2 rhinos. I thought the press hated the Bushes.

UncleJesse Loc: Hazzard Co, GA

http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2016/09/when_facts_history_and_logic_d.html

His great weakness is his vanity. He is temperamentally incapable of allowing any attack on his person to go unavenged. He is particularly sensitive on the subject of his wealth. So central to his self-image is his business acumen that in the debate he couldn't resist the temptation to tout his cleverness on taxes. To an audience of 86 million, he appeared to concede that he didn't pay any. "That makes me smart," he smugly interjected.

Big mistake.

bilordinary Loc: SW Washington

I and many others here are not nor want to be included in your "all"
Start acting like the nobody you are!

ubfiller

AMEN BROTHER !