Big dog wrote:
Glaucon chimes in again with negativity, what a surprise !
Negativity in response to negativity. Would that make a positivity? Joke intended.
If you really wanted more positive exchanges on OPP wouldn't it be best to begin where you would have most power and influence.........with yourself?
Tasine wrote:
Funny. A lot more people think YOU are the master of hatred than think that of me. Guess you are paranoid. As I said before, go away!!!!
Your views may be biased the same as those of everyone else, but few are as lacking in self reflection as you are. Apparently I haven't even been able to introduce you to yourself. Pain, suffering, and unhappiness cause your hate and you apparently need to keep it to avoid acknowledging and dealing with the real causes of your hate.
You may have noticed that about 96% of participants on this site are certifiable, raging hate mongering head cases. I think the members of your tribe would obviously agree with you who hates and how intensely they do.
Paranoid is a big word that has specific meaning to those who are appropriately trained. You might want to, at least, look it up in a dictionary before you use it as an intended insult.
Glaucon wrote:
Your views may be biased the same as those of everyone else, but few are as lacking in self reflection as you are. Apparently I haven't even been able to introduce you to yourself. Pain, suffering, and unhappiness cause your hate and you apparently need to keep it to avoid acknowledging and dealing with the real causes of your hate.
You may have noticed that about 96% of participants on this site are certifiable, raging hate mongering head cases. I think the members of your tribe would obviously agree with you who hates and how intensely they do.
Paranoid is a big word that has specific meaning to those who are appropriately trained. You might want to, at least, look it up in a dictionary before you use it as an intended insult.
Your views may be biased the same as those of eve... (
show quote)
I would have put that figure at 100% of liberals.
Big Bass wrote:
I would have put that figure at 100% of liberals.
BigAss, You are posting on this site and, if you know any math, 100% means all of something and that would make you a closet liberal?
Glaucon wrote:
BigAss, You are posting on this site and, if you know any math, 100% means all of something and that would make you a closet liberal?
Why?? 100% of liberals means 100% of liberals. No figure of normal people as a percentage is mentioned, so, Sherlock, you do not understand math and you are wrong as always. Why do you even bother? You always get owned.
Glaucon wrote:
Negativity in response to negativity. Would that make a positivity? Joke intended.
If you really wanted more positive exchanges on OPP wouldn't it be best to begin where you would have most power and influence.........with yourself?
Nice come back. What, no swearing ? I guess you took your meds today.
Big dog wrote:
Nice come back. What, no swearing ? I guess you took your meds today.
I didn't recall that you swore at me in your comment to which I was responding, so I responded in kind.
The meds insult has been so overused, lame, and irrelevant that I find it consequential only as it defines the mental functioning of the the person using it................................................AGAIN.
I am happy my previous response pleased you.
Big Bass wrote:
Why?? 100% of liberals means 100% of liberals. No figure of normal people as a percentage is mentioned, so, Sherlock, you do not understand math and you are wrong as always. Why do you even bother? You always get owned.
BigAss, you are sounding like the convoluted bull shit Trump handlers use to try to fix his fuck ups and you did no better and no worse than they do.
However, math, logic, and thinking are not your strong suits. When you count your fingers more than once, do you get different answers?
I don't recall you saying so, but it is about 99.99997 probability you will be voting for Trump, the non thinking man's choice.
Big Bass wrote:
Why?? 100% of liberals means 100% of liberals. No figure of normal people as a percentage is mentioned, so, Sherlock, you do not understand math and you are wrong as always. Why do you even bother? You always get owned.
You might want to check your comments before you send them. Your message was clear and apparently you are choosing to try to change the meaning of your comment or you were confused when you wrote it.
Big dog wrote:
Oooo you sound SO smart ! You might sound smarter if you kept your mouth shut and your fingers in your pocket.
" Never engage in a war of thought with an imbecile.....They are unarmed."
I might have paraphrased that......But, I think you are still trying to figure out what "Paraphrased" means..
I guess your own fingers are somewhere where the doesn't shine?
Hemi....
You don't post a comment?
I would think it would be.......How many fingers?.........Where does the sun NOT shine?.....
Glaucon wrote:
I didn't recall that you swore at me in your comment to which I was responding, so I responded in kind.
The meds insult has been so overused, lame, and irrelevant that I find it consequential only as it defines the mental functioning of the the person using it................................................AGAIN.
I am happy my previous response pleased you.
Please forgive my comment regarding" meds". It just seams as though you have an angry streak in so many of your responses.
It's highly unlikely you will find me using profanities in my rhetoric since I believe it to be the conversation of the less than intelligent.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.