Progressive One

A Democrat In 2016 wrote:
tossing racist stereotypes and name-calling is not conversation. I can go back and show what the criteria was for giving them the boot.......

Loki wrote:

How about the criteria that got your ass the boot in the first place, poor little put upon Negro? Grow up. You start racist crap and then whine when you are bested at it. But cheer up. I have yet to meet a Liberal of any color who is willing to take responsibility for anything that goes wrong, so at least it's not a "black thing."


A Democrat In 2016 wrote:

See what I mean? Now IF I go into all that pink ass filthy ass white trash cracka shit, or told you if you saw a little negro, let them put a big black d-ck in your mouth,you will overlook your initial statement as the catalyst for the nasty exchange of hate, and that is how it always worked. you're a really dishonest person...no one really gives a fuck but it is the principle of the matter.

Loki wrote:

Yes, you see. YOU START with your "cracka" white trash shit, and then get so damn offended when someone calls you a stupid assed nigger. Perhaps you should get the white dick out of your own mouth, Leroy. To hear you tell it, you are the one who is getting it in the ass from whitey every day. You call people white boys, which has the same connotation as nigger, and it's perfectly fine; but just let someone respond in kind and watch your Affirmative Action Ass get offended.

I'm writing:

That is what I mean by their dishonesty and why they had to get the boot. He replies to my first response that was non-insulting with that little negro shit. When I respond with “what if” I was to respond with an insult and not actually do so, he replies from the premise that I started with the cracka thing. Wolf then offers HIM congrats. They are so fucking dishonest and underhanded I just felt the best solution would be to minimize any engagement. It is not about being scared or having feelings hurt. It is about the principle of exchanging hate with their dishonest asses. I can take everyone on the list and show where they offered the initial insult or racist ass statement. That is why they are on ignore...not because someone cannot handle their racist shit. They are too gotdamn dishonest and underhanded at the same time. They say vile racist things and then want to be the offended one.

Cool Breeze

Ha Ha there is a complaint that you are a coward because you have put some of these vile racists on notice by using the ignore button. Let them tell it they did nothing but politely disagree with you. We both know that's a crock if shit! They miss you although they won't admit it.

Progressive One

They are still in that other thread defending each other when I can post hundreds of examples of them starting the vicious cycle with the hate speech then not being accountable for it while railing on my responses ONLY. You are right, they miss me, but for the purpose of exchanging racist hate. many of them do not even login as much since I ignored them...mainly the ones who never post anything worthy of discussion...this is their hate festival.......OPP...did you see all the lies ao posted about having driver's license of people and knowing where they stayed and talking to mayor Riordan? he is a pathological liar and would love to disclose all those things publicly. I reviewed lots of past conversations...lots.......

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

Someone called him a coward ?

Not a member of the shallow gene pool gang ?

Must be someone that was angry and not thinking straight.
Huuuuuuum !!!!!!!!

Progressive One

Not a coward at all...can take them all on...but unlike many.....I have significant things to spend my time on...and If I didn't..I'm not going to let them be a regular occurrence..where i become a regular buffoon with them with this lowered quality of life bullshit....grown ass men need to grow up..plus, if I turn up the heat, they will become victims and cry to Admin

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Context.

Progressive One

Read about communication from a formal perspective. How the message is received is what drives the communication dynamic. The sender's intent does not mean anything.

archie bunker Loc: Texas

Jibberish. Context.

Progressive One

Bye Archie...it was swell.......there is no sense in explaining the real-world academic approach that occurs in formal business environments...I get paid to explain the same things in MBA Organizational Behavior courses...i'll be damn if I argue with someone not on that level about the same exact things....for free.....at some point I have to be fair to myself. I'll just purge you all and use this thread to debunk right-wing lies and dishonesty...I don't need to talk to none of you is it has to be under a dishonest, racist premise. I'm kool...so go join your buddies. They say it is a badge of honor. Good for them....so since ao said I wanted to be white. At least I hope that there would be some whites I wouldn't associate with anyway. I'd hope I would still be a liberal/progressive.

Progressive One

First Thing That The Right Cannot Handle: Those Black Guys Are Professors:

SK FACTCHECK
Obama a Constitutional Law Professor?
By Joe MillerPosted on March 28, 2008


515
Q: Was Barack Obama really a constitutional law professor?
A: His formal title was "senior lecturer," but the University of Chicago Law School says he "served as a professor" and was "regarded as" a professor.
FULL QUESTION
When I was in law school, I addressed all of my course instructors as "professors," regardless of their rank or formal position in the school academic hierarchy (tenured professor, assistant professor, adjunct professor, lecturer, etc.). Was Obama exaggerating or factually wrong in referring to himself as a "constitutional law professor" at the University of Chicago Law School even though his official title was lecturer?
FULL ANSWER
Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when he said, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."

Singer (March 27): Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as “a constitutional law professor” out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response.

We agree that details matter, and also that the formal title of "professor" is not lightly given by academic institutions. However, on this matter the University of Chicago Law School itself is not standing on formality, and is siding with Obama.
Due to numerous press inquiries on the matter, the school released a carefully worded statement saying that for his 12 years there he was considered to be "a professor."
UC Law School statement: The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer." From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

Contrary to what the Clinton campaign claimed, not all professors have tenure. For instance, academics with the title of "assistant professor" typically work for between five and seven years before being reviewed for tenure.
Furthermore, Obama was not merely an "instructor" as Phil Singer stated. As a "senior lecturer," Obama was in good company: The six other faculty members with the title include the associate dean of the law school and Judge Richard Posner, who is widely considered to be one of the nation’s top legal theorists.
-Joe Miller

Update March 28: As originally written this item stated flatly that the law school "confirms that Obama was a professor." We have rewritten the item in parts to more accurately reflect the nuance in the law school’s news release.
Sources

Farrington, Brendan. "Obama: Bush Not Respecting Constitution." The San Francisco Chronicle, 30 March 2007. 27 March 2008.


Sweet, Lynn. "Sweet Column Reprise. Obama’s Book: What’s Real, What’s Not." Chicago Sun Times, 8 August 2004. 27 March 2008.
University of Chicago Law School. "Law School Faculty." The University of Chicago Law School Online Catalog, 14 May 2007. 27 March 2008.
Categories:Ask FactCheck

Progressive One

By the way Glaucon, that is a good idea to wager since they want to deny what you said you were, as if you are telling lies to them like they are your parents or something. I'd take that bet also.....gives credence to that statement, "put your money where your mouth is"....if one truly believes in what they are saying...........