Trooper745 Loc: Carolina

Says a lot for the people of Massachusetts that this dingbat bitch is the best lawyer they could get to take the job of AG.

Shirley Cameron

Nothing makes the gun fire but the person using it. Our police are authorized in order for us to carry we have to pass the background and go to a class. It would be hard for me to do bodily harm to any human being but if I had to protect family, life, or hunt to eat I would. It would be hard. I have deer in my backyard and they are beautiful, but in order to eat I would and the back strap of a deer is delicious.

PeterS

When all you have to do is to cross a border and buy anything your heart desires banning guns of any type will have absolutely no impact. I appreciate the sentiment but gun control has to be top down which means it has to be a national movement and the more frequent there are mass shootings the more likely it will, someday soon, become a reality.

Liberal logic means we live in a democracy and the more tenacious national will the more likely our representatives will be pressured into getting off their worthless butts and doing what their constituents put them in office to do. If they don't we will put into office someone who will.

Gosh, it seems liberal logic is a lot like our conservative friends....

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

California is next.

Governor Moonbat just signed the following:

Assembly Bill 1135 and Senate Bill 880 would make changes of monumental scale to California’s firearm laws by reclassifying hundreds of thousands of legally owned semi-automatic rifles as “assault weapons.” This legislation effectively outlaws magazine locking devices, more commonly known as “bullet buttons”.These areconstitutionally protected firearms that have no association with crime. These changes would happen quickly with great individual costs to many gun owners and without public notice. Governor Brown vetoed similar legislation in 2013.

Assembly Bill 1511 would effectively end the long-standing practice of temporarily loaning a firearm for lawful purposes. Under this legislation the ability to loan a firearm to anyone other than a family member would now be prohibited unless conducted through a dealer, absent very narrow and limited exceptions. A simple loan to a trusted friend for a few days would take almost a month to complete from loan to return, requiring two background checks, two 10 day waiting periods, two fees and multiple trips to a gun dealer. The result of the misguided legislation would turn otherwise law-abiding citizens into criminals simply for borrowing or storing a firearm with a friend.

Assembly Bill 1695 would create a 10-year firearm prohibition for someone convicted of falsely reporting a lost or stolen firearm. The NRA does not oppose making it a misdemeanor to knowingly file a false lost or stolen report to law enforcement. Our reason for opposition is related to the restriction of a constitutional right for the conviction of a misdemeanor offense.

- Senate Bill 1235 would place unjustified and burdensome restrictions on the purchase of ammunition and would require the attorney general to keep records of purchases. This legislation would further require any online ammunition sales to be conducted through a licensed vendor. First and foremost, the reporting of ammunition sales has already been tried -- and failed -- at the federal level. Throughout the 1980s, Congress considered repeal of a federal ammunition regulation package that required, among other things, reporting of ammunition sales. In 1986, the director of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms supported eliminating the reporting requirement, stating: "The Bureau and the [Treasury] Department have recognized that current record keeping requirements for ammunition have no substantial law enforcement value." As a result, the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 repealed the ammunition restrictions, with little opposition to the removal of that requirement. SB 1235 will similarly fail to reduce violent crime, as a law requiring the registration of ammunition purchases by honest citizens will not deter criminals. Governor Brown has twice vetoed similar legislation.

Senate Bill 1446 would ban the simple possession of ammunition feeding devices/magazines that are capable of holding more than 10 cartridges. The federal “large-ammunition feeding device” ban of 1994-2004 was allowed to sunset due in part to its ineffectiveness. Yet, California anti-gun legislators still are persisting with this ban knowing that the congressionally-mandated study concluded that “the banned guns were never used in more than a modest fraction of all gun murders” before the ban and the bans 10-round limit on new magazines was not a factor in multiple-victim or multiple-wound crimes.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Well I hope she's sent flying!!!!
She should enforce the gun laws, not usurp them!!

She contributes to the very real problem centering around illegal use of firearms by dropping that important charge!!

What an idiot and hypocrite!!!

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Anything from the NRA on this Blade???
Or any challenge at all is what I am really asking..

okie don

2nd Amendment is being ' INFRINGED'.
NJ is moving to have their unconstitutional GOV'T action overturned.
Miller v US 230 Fed 486,489" the claim and exercise of a Constitutional
( guaranteed) right cannot be converted into a crime".
Sherer v Cullen 481 F 946
Norton v Shelby County 118 US 425
p 442
Situtteesworth v city of Birmingham Alabama 373 US 262
Murdock v Pennsylvania 319 US 105" no State shall convert a LIBERTY into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefore"
Here's you gals some case law cases. Get the cases, learn to fight these unconstitutional Edit's that are wrong.

okie don

2nd Amendment is being ' INFRINGED'.
NJ is moving to have their unconstitutional GOV'T action overturned.
Miller v US 230 Fed 486,489" the claim and exercise of a Constitutional
( guaranteed) right cannot be converted into a crime".
Sherer v Cullen 481 F 946
Norton v Shelby County 118 US 425
p 442
Situtteesworth v city of Birmingham Alabama 373 US 262
Murdock v Pennsylvania 319 US 105" no State shall convert a LIBERTY into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefore"
Here's you gals some case law cases. Get the cases, learn to fight these unconstitutional Edit's that are wrong.

okie don

IMHO, ALL States should have 'open carry w/o permit. We have Muslim 'beheaders' coming in and stupid Sanctuary Cities; a race war being generated by the DC idiots and a wide open southern border with criminals flooding in.
Our 'Gubment has 2 prime functions. 1. Maintain the stability of our currency. 2. Maintain our nation's borders. Neither are being done. A nation without secure borders looses it's soveigernty.
Our Laws are defunct. Look at the treason Hitlery has done with Emails. That's TREASON.
Yet no penalty's for Hitlery. BS!!!