One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Donald Trump will not be President of the US
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Jun 12, 2016 05:54:21   #
PeterS
 
bmac32 wrote:
Bush 41, think you need to go back a bit, Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill referred to the New World Order in the 30's. As a conspiracy theory, the term New World Order or NWO refers to the emergence of a totalitarian world government, so who will rule in any of your minds, Russia, China, the US, maybe North Korea or Iran. This is simple a theory, ya could be but it wouldn't happen in your lifetime.


Wilson died in 24. Did he do so from the grave? And I have to ask--the wealthy already control everything so hasn't the NWO already taken place?

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 06:53:33   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
PeterS wrote:
Trump has alienated women and minorities. Hillary doesn't have to pull any shenanigans to get elected. She just has to let Donald keep opening his mouth and his rhetoric will do the rest...


Worked well for Mr.Trump so far and you're butt buddy The criminal Hillary Clinton can't rule from a federal penitentiary.There will be no theft from this federal institution.

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 07:07:16   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Hemiman wrote:
Saying that if trump is elected the only reason he made it is because he is illuminati, is irresponsible,crazy and just plain stupid.You have no knowledge of this and no right to say it.


Maybe Trump will be because Hillarys email scandal, I guess is more than just a scandal~Now lets see what Lynch does, if anything..BO is either fuming or gave the ok~~What's the political motive of all of this now, I wonder????

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-goldberg-clinton-email-20160528-story.html

Ms. Clinton held a press conference at the United Nations intended to put the whole controversy to rest. Nearly every significant statement she made was a lie. And we've known it for a year.


For instance, she said, "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material." We know that's untrue. Of the emails she handed over (remember, she unilaterally deleted some 32,000 on her own), 2,079 of them contained classified material, some given a classification even more sensitive than "top secret," some fairly mundane. Her campaign clings to the fact that they were not "marked" classified.

Nonsense. Classified material is "born" classified, and it was Ms. Clinton's job to understand that. Moreover, how could the classified material she sent be marked "classified" if the whole point of her shadow server was to avoid oversight by the people who do the classifying? It's like selling bootleg gin and then claiming that no one from the government marked it "bootleg."


Another major lie: that she did this out of "convenience" because she didn't want to carry two devices. The whole thing sort of just happened on auto-pilot while she was concentrating on much more important things, Ms. Clinton insisted.

More lies. Not only did she carry several devices, but the IG report makes it clear that this stealth rig took a lot of planning and effort. She told staffers, "I don't want any risk of the personal being accessible."

When two employees in the IT department raised concerns that Ms. Clinton's stealth server would not properly preserve records, a supervisor replied that the matter had been reviewed and approved by lawyers and that the staffers were "never to speak of the secretary's personal email system again."

That's a strange instruction for something lawyers approved, isn't it? The IG couldn't find any evidence of this legal review of Ms. Clinton's system. These mystery lawyers are surely unreachable because they are aiding O.J. Simpson in the search for the real killers.

If such a review existed, you'd think the Clinton campaign would provide it to investigators (and the press). Then again, if Ms. Clinton did nothing wrong, she also would have talked to the inspector general, like every other relevant secretary of state did. And she would have happily told her team to cooperate with the IG to clear the air. They all refused. I wonder why.

Just kidding. Of course I don't wonder why. From the earliest days of this scandal -- and it is a scandal -- Ms. Clinton has lied. Unlike Donald Trump's lies, which he usually vomits up spontaneously like a vesuvian geyser, Ms. Clinton's were carefully prepared, typed up and repeated for all the world to hear over and over again.

I would think this is an important distinction. Neither of the candidates is worthy of the office in my eyes, but voters might discount many of Mr. Trump's deceits as symptoms of his glandular personality. Much like Vice President Joe Biden, who always gets a pass for launching errant fake-fact missiles from the offline silo that is his mouth, Mr. Trump is often seen as entertainingly spontaneous.

Meanwhile, Ms. Clinton -- who lives many time zones away from the word "entertaining" -- is marketing herself as the mature and upstanding grown-up. She does nothing spontaneously. And that means all of her lies are premeditated.

Jonah Goldberg is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior editor of National Review. His email is goldbergcolumn@gmail.com. Twitter: @JonahNRO.

Copyright © 2016, The Baltimore Sun
Hillary Clinton Donald Trump Joe Biden U.S. Department of State Freedom of Information Act

Reply
 
 
Jun 12, 2016 07:25:56   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
lindajoy wrote:
Maybe Trump will be because Hillarys email scandal, I guess is more than just a scandal~Now lets see what Lynch does, if anything..BO is either fuming or gave the ok~~What's the political motive of all of this now, I wonder????

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-goldberg-clinton-email-20160528-story.html

Ms. Clinton held a press conference at the United Nations intended to put the whole controversy to rest. Nearly every significant statement she made was a lie. And we've known it for a year.


For instance, she said, "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material." We know that's untrue. Of the emails she handed over (remember, she unilaterally deleted some 32,000 on her own), 2,079 of them contained classified material, some given a classification even more sensitive than "top secret," some fairly mundane. Her campaign clings to the fact that they were not "marked" classified.

Nonsense. Classified material is "born" classified, and it was Ms. Clinton's job to understand that. Moreover, how could the classified material she sent be marked "classified" if the whole point of her shadow server was to avoid oversight by the people who do the classifying? It's like selling bootleg gin and then claiming that no one from the government marked it "bootleg."


Another major lie: that she did this out of "convenience" because she didn't want to carry two devices. The whole thing sort of just happened on auto-pilot while she was concentrating on much more important things, Ms. Clinton insisted.

More lies. Not only did she carry several devices, but the IG report makes it clear that this stealth rig took a lot of planning and effort. She told staffers, "I don't want any risk of the personal being accessible."

When two employees in the IT department raised concerns that Ms. Clinton's stealth server would not properly preserve records, a supervisor replied that the matter had been reviewed and approved by lawyers and that the staffers were "never to speak of the secretary's personal email system again."

That's a strange instruction for something lawyers approved, isn't it? The IG couldn't find any evidence of this legal review of Ms. Clinton's system. These mystery lawyers are surely unreachable because they are aiding O.J. Simpson in the search for the real killers.

If such a review existed, you'd think the Clinton campaign would provide it to investigators (and the press). Then again, if Ms. Clinton did nothing wrong, she also would have talked to the inspector general, like every other relevant secretary of state did. And she would have happily told her team to cooperate with the IG to clear the air. They all refused. I wonder why.

Just kidding. Of course I don't wonder why. From the earliest days of this scandal -- and it is a scandal -- Ms. Clinton has lied. Unlike Donald Trump's lies, which he usually vomits up spontaneously like a vesuvian geyser, Ms. Clinton's were carefully prepared, typed up and repeated for all the world to hear over and over again.

I would think this is an important distinction. Neither of the candidates is worthy of the office in my eyes, but voters might discount many of Mr. Trump's deceits as symptoms of his glandular personality. Much like Vice President Joe Biden, who always gets a pass for launching errant fake-fact missiles from the offline silo that is his mouth, Mr. Trump is often seen as entertainingly spontaneous.

Meanwhile, Ms. Clinton -- who lives many time zones away from the word "entertaining" -- is marketing herself as the mature and upstanding grown-up. She does nothing spontaneously. And that means all of her lies are premeditated.

Jonah Goldberg is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior editor of National Review. His email is goldbergcolumn@gmail.com. Twitter: @JonahNRO.

Copyright © 2016, The Baltimore Sun
Hillary Clinton Donald Trump Joe Biden U.S. Department of State Freedom of Information Act
Maybe Trump will be because Hillarys email scandal... (show quote)


Did you ever think you would live in a world where someone so obvious a criminal of the worst kind, can walk free and flaunt her crimes like it's all a big joke.

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 07:28:35   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
eden wrote:
Thank you for this evenings episode of the "Twilight Zone"...

Must agree Eden ,,
Do not attempt adjust your dail . you entering the Steve 700 Zone ... sorry steve , but Eden does have a very real world point

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 07:36:31   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
PeterS wrote:
Trump has alienated women and minorities. Hillary doesn't have to pull any shenanigans to get elected. She just has to let Donald keep opening his mouth and his rhetoric will do the rest...


Its full speed ahead on your guilt trip , bad white man in past , today's white man must pay !! Really !! Have a rotten trip and do not forget your lubricant !!

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 07:37:29   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
reconreb wrote:
Must agree Eden ,,
Do not attempt adjust your dail . you entering the Steve 700 Zone ... sorry steve , but Eden does have a very real world point


I understand why Eden would disagree,but what do you find so outrageous about what he wrote.It seems plausible too me.

Reply
 
 
Jun 12, 2016 07:42:10   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Hemiman wrote:
Did you ever think you would live in a world where someone so obvious a criminal of the worst kind, can walk free and flaunt her crimes like it's all a big joke.


No, I did not, Hemi~~It's a slap in the face of the Judicial process itself and shows its bias...The more money and the higher your Power, the less likely you will ever see charges..She, a prefect example of it!!

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 07:49:28   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
lindajoy wrote:
No, I did not, Hemi~~It's a slap in the face of the Judicial process itself and shows its bias...The more money and the higher your Power, the less likely you will ever see charges..She, a prefect example of it!!



Reply
Jun 12, 2016 10:09:20   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Hemiman wrote:


Thank You, my friend~~

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 10:10:46   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
As much as Obama want's to be king the process is already in swing to replace him, ever Harry Reid would have troubles with this.



Steve700 wrote:
Why do you all presume there will be an election. Do you really think that Obama with the illuminati behind him is going to allow trump to become president and undo everything Obama has done to bring us down and get us ready to be acclimated into the coming one world government. I'll be surprised if elections actually happen and even more surprised if Trump wins and if that does happen probably it will be because he's going to turn out to be an illuminati plant just like Obama was.

Reply
 
 
Jun 12, 2016 10:19:52   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
The phrase "new world order" was explicitly used in connection with Woodrow Wilson's global zeitgeist during the period just after World War I, during the formation of the League of Nations. "The war to end all wars" had been a powerful catalyst in international politics, and many felt the world could simply no longer operate as it once had. The First World War had been justified not only in terms of U.S. national interest but in moral terms—to "make the world safe for democracy." After the war, Wilson argued for a new world order which transcended traditional great power politics, instead emphasizing collective security, democracy, and self-determination. However, the United States Senate rejected membership of the League of Nations, which Wilson believed to be the key to a new world order. Senator Henry Cabot Lodge argued that American policy should be based on human nature "as it is, not as it ought to be."[5]




PeterS wrote:
Wilson died in 24. Did he do so from the grave? And I have to ask--the wealthy already control everything so hasn't the NWO already taken place?

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 10:27:26   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Speaking of Joe Biden has anyone noticed that Hillary's handling of emails has been off limits to Joe? Now why could this be?



lindajoy wrote:
Maybe Trump will be because Hillarys email scandal, I guess is more than just a scandal~Now lets see what Lynch does, if anything..BO is either fuming or gave the ok~~What's the political motive of all of this now, I wonder????

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-goldberg-clinton-email-20160528-story.html

Ms. Clinton held a press conference at the United Nations intended to put the whole controversy to rest. Nearly every significant statement she made was a lie. And we've known it for a year.


For instance, she said, "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material." We know that's untrue. Of the emails she handed over (remember, she unilaterally deleted some 32,000 on her own), 2,079 of them contained classified material, some given a classification even more sensitive than "top secret," some fairly mundane. Her campaign clings to the fact that they were not "marked" classified.

Nonsense. Classified material is "born" classified, and it was Ms. Clinton's job to understand that. Moreover, how could the classified material she sent be marked "classified" if the whole point of her shadow server was to avoid oversight by the people who do the classifying? It's like selling bootleg gin and then claiming that no one from the government marked it "bootleg."


Another major lie: that she did this out of "convenience" because she didn't want to carry two devices. The whole thing sort of just happened on auto-pilot while she was concentrating on much more important things, Ms. Clinton insisted.

More lies. Not only did she carry several devices, but the IG report makes it clear that this stealth rig took a lot of planning and effort. She told staffers, "I don't want any risk of the personal being accessible."

When two employees in the IT department raised concerns that Ms. Clinton's stealth server would not properly preserve records, a supervisor replied that the matter had been reviewed and approved by lawyers and that the staffers were "never to speak of the secretary's personal email system again."

That's a strange instruction for something lawyers approved, isn't it? The IG couldn't find any evidence of this legal review of Ms. Clinton's system. These mystery lawyers are surely unreachable because they are aiding O.J. Simpson in the search for the real killers.

If such a review existed, you'd think the Clinton campaign would provide it to investigators (and the press). Then again, if Ms. Clinton did nothing wrong, she also would have talked to the inspector general, like every other relevant secretary of state did. And she would have happily told her team to cooperate with the IG to clear the air. They all refused. I wonder why.

Just kidding. Of course I don't wonder why. From the earliest days of this scandal -- and it is a scandal -- Ms. Clinton has lied. Unlike Donald Trump's lies, which he usually vomits up spontaneously like a vesuvian geyser, Ms. Clinton's were carefully prepared, typed up and repeated for all the world to hear over and over again.

I would think this is an important distinction. Neither of the candidates is worthy of the office in my eyes, but voters might discount many of Mr. Trump's deceits as symptoms of his glandular personality. Much like Vice President Joe Biden, who always gets a pass for launching errant fake-fact missiles from the offline silo that is his mouth, Mr. Trump is often seen as entertainingly spontaneous.

Meanwhile, Ms. Clinton -- who lives many time zones away from the word "entertaining" -- is marketing herself as the mature and upstanding grown-up. She does nothing spontaneously. And that means all of her lies are premeditated.

Jonah Goldberg is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a senior editor of National Review. His email is goldbergcolumn@gmail.com. Twitter: @JonahNRO.

Copyright © 2016, The Baltimore Sun
Hillary Clinton Donald Trump Joe Biden U.S. Department of State Freedom of Information Act
Maybe Trump will be because Hillarys email scandal... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 12:05:30   #
Carol Kelly
 
Steve700 wrote:
Why do you all presume there will be an election. Do you really think that Obama with the illuminati behind him is going to allow trump to become president and undo everything Obama has done to bring us down and get us ready to be acclimated into the coming one world government. I'll be surprised if elections actually happen and even more surprised if Trump wins and if that does happen probably it will be because he's going to turn out to be an illuminati plant just like Obama was.


I agree about elections and Obama and the Illuminati, but not about Trump being an implant. Hillary has been invited to their annual meeting, not Trump. She's more malleable. And greedy and murderous and TREACHEROUS!

Reply
Jun 12, 2016 16:09:02   #
bev45ham
 
So sorry just became a member. Who is the nasty one?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.