The sad part I think you actually believe your own bullshit,manufacturing jobs(the back bone of our nation) have continued to decline for the 8th year,the supposed job growth is mainly contributed to part time service jobs the admin.has decided to include in their statistics,wages remain stagnant and the middle classes spending power has declined 10,000 dollars in the past 8 years,with United Health care discontinuing their participation in the ACA the doomed from the start program is rapidly failing,the majority of the supposed newly insured are largely a product of medicare expansion and have nothing to do with the privately insured, most have seen their premiums rise at a rate that would not have occurred other wise,many are being forced to decide between the penalties or an insurance plan they cannot afford to use because of the astronomically high deductibles, his foreign policy is a joke ,more soldiers have died under his watch in Afghanistan than that of Bush,3 times as many,his early with- drawal from Iraq directly led to the formation and expansion of ISIS and along with the fiasco in Libya has been directly responsible for hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths ,we have become a joke on the world stage,our allies no longer trust or respect us and our enemies no longer fear us,his numerous scandals including fast and furious and the IRS targeting scandal have lead to his repeated lying to cover his involvement,I could continue for days stating the damage he has done to our nation but feel it would have no affect on you since you are obviously an Obama troll or the village idiot.

I did dispute them factually on page two. But nobody responded, because there is no response to actual facts. You and your Democrat pals (Cool Breeze and KHH1) are so busy slapping each other on the back, you can't see that plenty of facts have been offered. You choose to ignore the real facts when they paint your half-black hero in a bad light.

The problem is, the three of you have become Collectivists, like so many other Democrats. Collectivists are not liberal or conservative, because they don't really have individual thought processes. Collectivists just jump on the wagon of every idea laid out by their puppeteers. Collectivists just copy and paste nonsense from Huff Post, Salon, and other puppeteer media. Collectivists don't really know what the words mean and cannot defend their posts. One of the worst flaws of Collectivism in the Political Correctness that is sweeping the country. It prevents them from seeing where the real problems lie. For example, the female shooter at San Bernardino was identified as a potential terrorist well before the shootout. But political correctness got in the way of sanity, and the Obama Administration ordered the FBI and the CIA to destroy evidence, to avoid the appearance of Islamophobia. I'm sure that the families of the dead people are thrilled with Obama's political correctness on that one.

But given what he inherited, and the opposition he faced, his accomplishments border on the miraculous. We now have the longest streak of job growth in history, adding 14.4 million private sector jobs over 73 straight months, with lower unemployment than under Ronald Reagan, about half of what he inherited from Bush. Obama has reduced the deficit by over $1 trillion. Even if you look at total debt, which obviously goes up because there is an annual deficit, Obama added less debt as a percent change in public debt than either George Bush, or that paragon of fiscal conservativism, Ronald Reagan. With Obamacare he brought the number of uninsured to below 10% for the first time in our history. He saved the auto industry, which sold 17 million cars in 2015, the most in our history. The stock market has soared to record heights during Obama’s tenure, and gas prices are the cheapest in over a decade. Obama saved the housing industry from collapse, prevented the banking industry from imploding, and kept the stock market from sliding into depression-era territory. These are historic accomplishments.

In foreign policy, the Nation rightly concludes that “Barak Obama is a Foreign Policy Grandmaster.” He withdrew troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, decimated al-Qaeda, thwarted Iran’s nuclear program, removed chemical weapons from Syria, toppled Gadhafi, halved the number of Russian and American nuclear missile launchers, redirected relationships with Cuba, improved ties with India, and signed a climate deal in which China for the first time agreed to participate meaningfully. Yes the world remains a dangerous place, ISIS coming to mind, and any foreign policy is open to legitimate criticism. Any decision on the world stage will have undesirable impacts, and these are naturally the focus of critics. But even the conservative Wall Street Journal says of Obama’s foreign policy successes, “Give the president his due here.” They add that “Mr. Obama has largely succeeded in what he set out to do.” That conclusion is from a publication that is no friend to Obama.

What makes these accomplishments all the more remarkable is that Obama was working against an opposition openly committed to his failure, which is more or less unprecedented in its brazenness. Mitch McConnell said on October 23, 2010 that “my number one priority is making sure Obama’s a one-term president.” Not making America great, or preventing terrorist attacks, or helping the middle-class, or bringing home our troops - no, the Republican leader has one top goal - to deny Obama any success, at any cost to America. GOP leaders wish for Obama to fail more than they hope America will succeed. They are not alone, having plenty of rank and file support for this treasonous idea. Rush Limbaugh said simply, “I hope he fails.” Rep. Michelle Bachmann said, “We’re hoping that President Obama’s policies don’t succeed.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-schweitzer/liberals-losing-perspecti_b_9728614.html?

Fiat, why are you reading Huff Post? They are the second biggest trash site, behind Salon. You can't believe anything you read there. I will comment on only a few "facts"; I don't have time to waste debunking all of Huff Post claims.

Employment comparisons for three Presidents:

Reagan -- 96 month gain of 19,267 million -- 19.4%
Unemployment rate down from 9.7% to 5.3%

Clinton -- 108 month gain of 19,173 million -- 16.3%
Unemployment rate down from 9.6% to 4.0%

Obama -- 73 month gain of 8,957 million -- 7.0%
Unemployment rate down from 9.6% to 5.3%

I understand that you quoted job gains, not employment gains, and that is 14,041 million in 73 months for Obama. So why so different than employment gains, you ask? Employment represents a count of people working, no matter how many jobs they have. The jobs count includes all jobs, counting many people double or triple if they have more than one job. What this means is, people are not doing well with income from only one job and are forced to work two or several jobs to make ends meet. This has been a serious problem during the current administration, people cannot get by with one job. They lost good paying jobs and were forced to work two jobs to make the same amount of money.

On foreign policy, Obama gave nuclear weapons to Iran, he toppled several Middle East leaders, allowing ISIS to run amok. He is kicking our long-time ally in the Middle East - Israel. He is stepping on Putin's toes. And he is bringing hundreds of thousands of Muslim terrorists to this country. I am not comfortable with any of that. I'm sure that Pollyanna Fiat is comfortable with it.

Rather than quote statistics on the deficit, I will just post a chart. Enjoy

But given what he inherited, and the opposition he faced, his accomplishments border on the miraculous. We now have the longest streak of job growth in history, adding 14.4 million private sector jobs over 73 straight months, with lower unemployment than under Ronald Reagan, about half of what he inherited from Bush. Obama has reduced the deficit by over $1 trillion. Even if you look at total debt, which obviously goes up because there is an annual deficit, Obama added less debt as a percent change in public debt than either George Bush, or that paragon of fiscal conservativism, Ronald Reagan. With Obamacare he brought the number of uninsured to below 10% for the first time in our history. He saved the auto industry, which sold 17 million cars in 2015, the most in our history. The stock market has soared to record heights during Obama’s tenure, and gas prices are the cheapest in over a decade. Obama saved the housing industry from collapse, prevented the banking industry from imploding, and kept the stock market from sliding into depression-era territory. These are historic accomplishments.

In foreign policy, the Nation rightly concludes that “Barak Obama is a Foreign Policy Grandmaster.” He withdrew troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, decimated al-Qaeda, thwarted Iran’s nuclear program, removed chemical weapons from Syria, toppled Gadhafi, halved the number of Russian and American nuclear missile launchers, redirected relationships with Cuba, improved ties with India, and signed a climate deal in which China for the first time agreed to participate meaningfully. Yes the world remains a dangerous place, ISIS coming to mind, and any foreign policy is open to legitimate criticism. Any decision on the world stage will have undesirable impacts, and these are naturally the focus of critics. But even the conservative Wall Street Journal says of Obama’s foreign policy successes, “Give the president his due here.” They add that “Mr. Obama has largely succeeded in what he set out to do.” That conclusion is from a publication that is no friend to Obama.

What makes these accomplishments all the more remarkable is that Obama was working against an opposition openly committed to his failure, which is more or less unprecedented in its brazenness. Mitch McConnell said on October 23, 2010 that “my number one priority is making sure Obama’s a one-term president.” Not making America great, or preventing terrorist attacks, or helping the middle-class, or bringing home our troops - no, the Republican leader has one top goal - to deny Obama any success, at any cost to America. GOP leaders wish for Obama to fail more than they hope America will succeed. They are not alone, having plenty of rank and file support for this treasonous idea. Rush Limbaugh said simply, “I hope he fails.” Rep. Michelle Bachmann said, “We’re hoping that President Obama’s policies don’t succeed.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-schweitzer/liberals-losing-perspecti_b_9728614.html?