Sandy Hook Massacre Families Given Permission to Sue Gun Makers in Landmark Decision!
Apr 14, 2016 16:03:15 #
Remington and the AR15 are screwed!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html
Apr 14, 2016 16:08:09 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
If it can be proven the manufacturers broke some laws that contributed to the shooting then fine, if not there should be no liability.
Apr 14, 2016 16:11:27 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
They can sue, but they haven't won anything yet, pal. Nor will they.
But, then with you libtards it is always the intention that counts, not necessarily the results. :wink:
Check out topic: The Democrat playbook is outdated: Terrell
Apr 14, 2016 16:15:56 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Why not sue the liberal moron and his moonbat mother? Bushmaster didn't kill the children.....a liberal did.
Apr 14, 2016 16:33:34 #
Nutter
Loc: Fly Over Zone
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
So if a drunk driver kills me or my wife we can sue Ford or whatever car brand was used?
Apr 14, 2016 16:40:22 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
If it can be proven the manufacturers broke some laws that contributed to the shooting then fine, if not there should be no liability.
Another waste of taxpayer money and court time.
Apr 14, 2016 16:49:10 #
The lawsuit is saying that Remington and the other defendants "unethically, oppressively, immorally and unscrupulously promoted the assaultive qualities and military uses of AR-15's to civilian purchasers"!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html!
JMHO wrote:
They can sue, but they haven't won anything yet, pal. Nor will they.
But, then with you libtards it is always the intention that counts, not necessarily the results. :wink:
But, then with you libtards it is always the intention that counts, not necessarily the results. :wink:
Check out topic: Trump Agrees to 4th Presidential Debate, Biden Refuses
Apr 14, 2016 17:09:54 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
The lawsuit is saying that Remington and the other defendants "unethically, oppressively, immorally and unscrupulously promoted the assaultive qualities and military uses of AR-15's to civilian purchasers"!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html!
Well, using libtard language like that, they have already lost!
Apr 14, 2016 17:17:09 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
I see. I had no idea that these companies talked that fool into killing his Mother and stealing HER weapon and killing those kids. I also didn't know that they blocked legislation that would have barred weapons in the home of a mentally deranged person. Wait a minute - the NRA did that!
Huh, I wonder why they aren't suing the NRA? I wonder why NO ONE sues the NRA? Oh, that's right, the gun manufacturers have more money than the NRA.
I guess these grieving families are going to build robot replacements for their dead children and that takes lots of dough. Now, if they were just trying to make a statement - they'd sue the NRA.
Apr 14, 2016 17:25:45 #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
The lawsuit is saying that Remington and the other defendants "unethically, oppressively, immorally and unscrupulously promoted the assaultive qualities and military uses of AR-15's to civilian purchasers"!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html!
Where in your anti-gun moonbat drivel was the word ILLEGAL. Because nothing Remington did was illegal. Why don't they sue the school for not protecting their children? Blood sucking lawyers--follow the money. When they lose they should be ordered to pay Remington's legal expenses in this ridiculous, frivolous lawsuit.
Apr 14, 2016 17:27:07 #
[quote=Raylan Wolfe]The lawsuit is saying that Remington and the other defendants "unethically, oppressively, immorally and unscrupulously promoted the assaultive qualities and military uses of AR-15's to civilian purchasers"!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Your are the first to mention the word 'illegal' on this topic, it is call "liability" retard!
So, which law did they break?
Apr 14, 2016 17:50:45 #
Already posted, little balls!
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
So, which law did they break?
Apr 14, 2016 17:55:11 #
[quote=Liberty Tree][quote=Raylan Wolfe]The lawsuit is saying that Remington and the other defendants "unethically, oppressively, immorally and unscrupulously promoted the assaultive qualities and military uses of AR-15's to civilian purchasers"!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html![/quote
By whose standards? What law was broken?[/quote]
I would normally say the manufacturers are innocent, but in this case there is a gray area. Was this an automatic, was it modified, was it marketed to the public as an automatic?
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/gun-manufacturer-moves-sandy-hook-lawsuit-federal-court
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/sandy-hook-massacre-families-given-permission-to-sue-gun-makers-in-landmark-legal-ruling-a6984826.html![/quote
By whose standards? What law was broken?[/quote]
I would normally say the manufacturers are innocent, but in this case there is a gray area. Was this an automatic, was it modified, was it marketed to the public as an automatic?
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/gun-manufacturer-moves-sandy-hook-lawsuit-federal-court
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: KP.2 COVID-19 Variant Mutating and Spreading in China