One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The Party of White People!
Page <<first <prev 11 of 13 next> last>>
Mar 24, 2016 21:45:54   #
fullspinzoo
 
A Democrat In 2016 wrote:
After the uproar over the remarks, Hillary Clinton’s campaign put out a statement clarifying what President Clinton had said:


“When Republicans controlled the White House, their trickle-down approach drove our economy to the brink of a collapse. After President Obama was elected, Republicans made it their number one goal to block him at every turn,” spokesman Angel Urena said in a statement. “That unprecedented obstruction these last eight years is their legacy, and the American people should reject it by electing Hillary Clinton to build on President Obama’s success so we can all grow and succeed together.”
After the uproar over the remarks, Hillary Clinton... (show quote)

Nice walk back or spin.

Reply
Mar 24, 2016 21:50:26   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
A Democrat In 2016 wrote:
Blah Blah Blah, Hillary will be your next POTUS. get over it. Obama did a wonderful job, especially saying f-k you to the GOP. That is what they get for trying to bully and threaten from Day 1. Got their hats handed to them. hilarious


Hillary is already the POS, that is as far as it will go..until Prison.

Reply
Mar 24, 2016 21:52:56   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
Nice walk back or spin.


Hillary success? Like what getting people killed? Spending her "charity funds" on an enormous salary? Committing more crimes? Chasing down women that her Husband sleeps with and paying them off of threatening them? Yeah...Hillary the great success story...hahahah HOHOH wowowowowooWOOOOOOOO Hahahah HOH HARHAR heheheh lolllalala!

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 00:06:42   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
A Democrat In 2016 wrote:
you're or you are


You are that stupid that you can't get my drift!

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 00:50:51   #
signoftheages
 
Cool Breeze wrote:
Conservative columnist George Will predicted over the weekend that Donald Trump would destroy the Republican Party as it exists today because his campaign strategy was to only attract white voters.

According to Will, Trump is a politician in the tradition of segregationist George Wallace because he believes that more "meanness" was needed in public discourse.

"The problem is this," Will told Fox News host Chris Wallace on Sunday. "Not only are his negatives at 61 percent -- almost double his positives, they are at 32 percent -- but he's appealing entirely to white people."

"[Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney] got 17 percent -- that's all -- of the non-white vote," he continued. "Trump, by every measure, would do worse than that. Which means he would not have to get just the 65 percent of the white vote to win that Ronald Reagan got, sweeping 49 states. He would have to get 70 percent of the white vote."

Will concluded: "A, it won't happen and B, it would destroy the Republican Party by making it the party of white people."

George Will"s fears are unfounded. The GOP is already the Party of White People and Toadies! http://crooksandliars.com/2016/03/george-will-donald-trump-had-turned-gop?utm_source=Crooks+and+Liars+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=effd88650e-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d4904be7bc-effd88650e-326960909
Conservative columnist George Will predicted over ... (show quote)
Hello bigot,always about race with you.

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 01:01:07   #
fullspinzoo
 
signoftheages wrote:
Hello bigot,always about race with you.

It's people like George Will, Karl Rove (same alma mater as my kids), Charles the Kraut, Steven Hayes, Nat'l review editor and the rest of the establishment entourage that couldn't get a Republican elected if they pulled all the corrupt bullshit Obama did.

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 01:13:43   #
fullspinzoo
 
A Democrat In 2016 wrote:
You White Boys are funny as hell. I guess you call yourselves tossing some cracker -ss hate my way, going about it like a bunch of Girl Scout Brownies-man stop and take a look at yourselves and the kinds of fools you really are acting like as grown -ss men. Do you really think some schoolgirl taunts are going to alter my emotional state or something? Get real and fade/lose that bullshit.

And you black folk? Full of hatred and bullshit. Obama has managed to bring out the best in you guys...which isn't much. You guys are truly the consummate RACISTS. All together I doubt you have 3 white friends.

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 01:27:36   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
And you black folk? Full of hatred and bullshit. Obama has managed to bring out the best in you guys...which isn't much. You guys are truly the consummate RACISTS. All together I doubt you have 3 white friends.


He doesn't have ANY friends,even his dog hates him.

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 01:31:17   #
Progressive One
 
fullspinzoo wrote:
And you black folk? Full of hatred and bullshit. Obama has managed to bring out the best in you guys...which isn't much. You guys are truly the consummate RACISTS. All together I doubt you have 3 white friends.


I'm talking about in OPP big dummy. If black people were really racist, we'd do the things to you that has been done to us. Black people just want equality, which in this country has to be fought for. you know the story. My white friends would hate you all, and they're white. Call em white toadies, haha. :lol:

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 03:02:13   #
Cool Breeze
 
tonya wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o9bsP2As3uc

If that doesn't play , search bill slams Obama on youtube.


Nice try! First of all it wasn't Bill who condemned Obama's. "Awful Legacy" it was hecklers. Creating your own alternate reality eh?

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 03:49:03   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Cool Breeze wrote:
Nice try! First of all it wasn't Bill who condemned Obama's. "Awful Legacy" it was hecklers. Creating your own alternate reality eh?


Do you worry about the threat from Muslims.

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 04:25:33   #
Cool Breeze
 
Hemiman wrote:
Do you worry about the threat from Muslims.


Nope! I think its time for a History Lesson! During the war in Viet Nam Mohammad Ali demonstrated his character and conviction unparalleled in sport figures today. Air Jordan? Forget it. LeBron? No harm but no cigar!

Ali made this statement concerning the "conflict" which amounted to treason at this time.

If I'm gonna die, I'm gonna die right here fighting you," Muhammad Ali says in archival footage of a college campus speaking tour he took nearly 50 years ago. Banned from boxing in 1967 after his conviction for refusing to serve in Vietnam, Ali had no immediate source of income to support his family. That led to the tour — a footnote in the man's history few documentaries have explored until now.

"You my enemy," he tells the assembled crowd of mostly white students. "My enemy is the white people, not Viet Cong or Chinese or Japanese. You my opposer when I want freedom. You my opposer when I want justice. You my opposer when I want equality. You won't even stand up for me in America for my religious beliefs — and you want me to go somewhere and fight, but you won't even stand up for me here at home?" Can you imagine today's superstar doing something like this? I have nothing against "Muslims". Why do you? http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-08-31/entertainment/ct-ae-0901-fall-movie-profile-20130831_1_muhammad-ali-opposer-chicago-director Think about it!

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 05:06:17   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Cool Breeze wrote:
Nope! I think its time for a History Lesson! During the war in Viet Nam Mohammad Ali demonstrated his character and conviction unparalleled in sport figures today. Air Jordan? Forget it. LeBron? No harm but no cigar!

Ali made this statement concerning the "conflict" which amounted to treason at this time.

If I'm gonna die, I'm gonna die right here fighting you," Muhammad Ali says in archival footage of a college campus speaking tour he took nearly 50 years ago. Banned from boxing in 1967 after his conviction for refusing to serve in Vietnam, Ali had no immediate source of income to support his family. That led to the tour — a footnote in the man's history few documentaries have explored until now.

"You my enemy," he tells the assembled crowd of mostly white students. "My enemy is the white people, not Viet Cong or Chinese or Japanese. You my opposer when I want freedom. You my opposer when I want justice. You my opposer when I want equality. You won't even stand up for me in America for my religious beliefs — and you want me to go somewhere and fight, but you won't even stand up for me here at home?" Can you imagine today's superstar doing something like this? I have nothing against "Muslims". Why do you? http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-08-31/entertainment/ct-ae-0901-fall-movie-profile-20130831_1_muhammad-ali-opposer-chicago-director Think about it!
Nope! I think its time for a History Lesson! Dur... (show quote)


Due to their stated intentions towards the west and actions in Europe as well as here.Do you think Ali will come to your defense or did that reference mean whites were your enemy and the Muslim threat is just for whites.Blacks and Muslims have a common enemy?if that's the case someone from the black community better tell them if they haven't already.You really do believe that some people hate Obama because he is black not because of his actions and associations.I guess what you are saying is you are a Muslim and part of this war on the world.

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 05:36:58   #
PeterS
 
Hemiman wrote:
Due to their stated intentions towards the west and actions in Europe as well as here.Do you think Ali will come to your defense or did that reference mean whites were your enemy and the Muslim threat is just for whites.Blacks and Muslims have a common enemy?if that's the case someone from the black community better tell them if they haven't already.You really do believe that some people hate Obama because he is black not because of his actions and associations.I guess what you are saying is you are a Muslim and part of this war on the world.
Due to their stated intentions towards the west an... (show quote)

Oh come now Hemi. You and I both know there is nothing Obama could have done that would have won conservatives approval. Hell the honeymoon was over just two weeks into his first term. If it wasn't because he was black than why was it? When you look at Trumps policy to deal with ISIS it's no different than Obamas--bomb the shit out of them and hope our 'friends' send in some troops to mop them up. What good is waterboarding going to do if all you are doing is dropping bombs from 50,000 feet? Yet you guys love Trump and think hes the toughest sob since Reagan in "Bedtime for Bonzo." So yeah, this has nothing to do with race and everything to do with policy-riiiiight...

That's okay Hemi because the days of "whites only" won't win you elections anymore and the fact that only 21% of women nationwide like Trump spells an even bigger problem for republicans. He's isolated minorities and women so who does that leave to get him into office a few old white farts?

Reply
Mar 25, 2016 06:00:17   #
Cool Breeze
 
Hemiman wrote:
Due to their stated intentions towards the west and actions in Europe as well as here.Do you think Ali will come to your defense or did that reference mean whites were your enemy and the Muslim threat is just for whites.Blacks and Muslims have a common enemy?if that's the case someone from the black community better tell them if they haven't already.You really do believe that some people hate Obama because he is black not because of his actions and associations.I guess what you are saying is you are a Muslim and part of this war on the world.
Due to their stated intentions towards the west an... (show quote)


So you want to play eh? Lets Rock! You asked me do I worry about Muslims. I said no. You then bloviated about Muslims actions in Europe and their attitudes about the west. How about Muslims actions in Africa? (can you hear the crickets?) Here is an interesting link! http://m.euronews.com/en/295402/ What say ye?

When did being a Muslim become a crime? Your hypocritical rant about Whites being the enemy has been dismissed as disingenuous tripe although there are some factions that have proven time again that they are not friends..

News about the latest bloodletting in Africa should come as no surprise to anyone who takes just the briefest interest in global affairs - as a matter of fact the only surprise is that it's made the news at all, especially when the country involved is the obscure Central African Republic(CAR).

Bloodletting has been going on unreported for decades, and indeed is still going on, in places such as South Africa and Zimbabwe in the south, to Chad, Mali and Mauritania in the north.

Central African countries have their own place in the historical bloodletting Hall of Fame due to its unbridled savagery, with Rwanda and Burundi taking top place with over eight hundred thousand people butchered, mainly by means of the panga. (a foot long type of machete)

The killings in the central region of Africa have been ongoing since decolonization and is mainly between rival tribes and warlords fighting it out for political control, and in particular, for control of the areas rich natural resources.

In recent years the bloodletting has been exacerbated by the rise and spread of militant Islam and its desire to erase all other religions and subject everyone to its control.

For decades in places such as Egypt, Nigeria, Sudan, Chad, Pakistan and Iran, Christians have been systematically slaughtered in huge numbers, sometimes in the most horrific fashion, without so much as a squeak of protest from the international handwringing community, including the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Pope.

The list of attacks by Muslims on Christians is truly staggering but hardly raises a ripple among the professional bureaucrats from the UN, the EU, the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the bleeding heart 'progressive' political class that infest the legislatures and institutions of western countries.

It is universally accepted nowadays that these supranational institutions and their compliant national governments have embarked on a global transformational agenda which requires equality of nations regardless of their individual states of development. Disparity between nations is eliminated by downgrading the developed world until they are more or less in line with the undeveloped world.

(For proof of this one only has to look at the sorry state of individual European countries compared to a decade ago and the rapid descent of America under the ultra progressive supranationalist Obama).

The eradication of Christians and Christianity, together with those nations whose culture and moral code is derived from Christianity, is therefore tolerated by the global 'progressive' elite and this can be verified by their reaction to events in the Central African Republic.

Briefly, the population of the Central African Republic is 80.3% Christian, 10.1% Muslim and 9.6% Indigenous beliefs. The Muslims, situated mainly in the north and backed by co-religionists from Sudan and Chad, overthrew the government and started to do what Muslims do best - use murder, violence and brutality to impose their religion on others.

The UN, the EU and the rest of the international handwringing community were relatively silent at this point only to wake up when the Christian community were forced to resist and fight back.

Unlike the inertia displayed when Christian communities were being slaughtered in Nigeria, Egypt, Sudan, Pakistan etc. the UN and France sent a force of peacekeepers to protect the Muslims from the people they had previously been violently subjugating.

The embattled Christian community were having none of the UN and France peacekeeping nonsense and continued to send the Muslim population packing declaring that they want every Muslim gone from their country.

This act of defiance and subsequent fight back set the alarm bells ringing among the supranational elite for obvious reasons: if this act of resistance by a Christian community was allowed to continue, other embattled populations might be emboldened and do the same, which could stall their transformational agenda and even put it into reverse.

The UN is authorizing the EU to send in troops and negotiators in attempt to broker a peace deal but the Christian resistance appears to be adamant; they have declared that there will be no reconciliation. It would appear that enough is enough and there is no going back.

In addition to this the usual suspects from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are monitoring the violence and sending their reports which are designed to garner sympathy but which only seem to have the opposite effect. The prevailing attitude seems to be that the Muslim community got what it deserved or is only getting a taste of their own medicine.

This is unfortunate because, as always, innocent people from all sides pay the biggest price in a civil war.

Again, unlike the mayhem and murder visited upon Christian communities in the aforementioned Muslim countries, the Chief Prosecutor of the ICC, a Ms. Fatou Bensouda, is instituting an investigation into possible war crimes.

At time of writing Ms. Bensouda doesn't appear to have instituted any such investigations in Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran etc. even though the number of murdered Christians is astronomically higher and the methods of dispatch are more horrific and heinous. See the list again here.

The thoroughly discredited and increasingly useless UNHCR can't resist getting in on the act and is attempting to justify its existence by hand wringing about one hundred thousand refugees and possible war crimes committed during the Christian community resistance and fight back.

They weren't nearly so vociferous during the original overthrow nor during the decades of slaughter of Christians around the world.

Looking to raise his profile and that of his organization, one leader of the UNHCR, a Mr. Luis Moreno Ocampo, talked about issuing an arrest warrant for Colonel Gaddafi of Libya some forty one years after he came to power and tens of thousands of deaths later.

In an exhibition of total incompetence, some bureaucrat from the same organisation wanted the killing of Gaddafi investigated because the manner of his dispatch might have constituted a war crime.

In conclusion I will add that these supranational institutions are loaded to the rafters with taxpayer funded, agenda driven placemen and lifelong professional bureaucrats. They are so remote from real people who live in the real world that they might as well be from another planet. They are religiously committed to their transformational agenda; it is their only reason for living.

What we, the real people can do, is give whatever support we can to the Christian community in the Central African Republic and to people everywhere, regardless of their beliefs, who are resisting and fighting back against the deliberate downgrading and Islamification of their communities and countries.
http://cambriandissenters.blogspot.com/2014/02/christians-killing-muslims-in-central.html?m=1 GOT IT!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: Abbe Lowell's Work Ethic
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.