One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Twitter enlists 'gay' thought police
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 14, 2016 05:56:31   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
PULLING NO PUNCHES
Twitter enlists 'gay' thought police
Exclusive: Matt Barber notes anti-Christian GLAAD now helping to censor site
Published: 1 day ago

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/05/Matt-Barber_avatar.jpg
author-image Matt Barber About | Email | Archive
Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber).


This cannot be good for free speech and the open exchange of ideas. Not for Christians and conservatives anyway.

Twitter announced on Wednesday that it has assembled a new “Twitter Trust & Safety Council” to “ensure that people feel safe expressing themselves on Twitter.”

Who’s for safety?

Yay safety!

Still, we need only look to the so-called “safe space” craze on America’s college campuses to gain a glimpse into what Twitter undoubtedly means here. Understand that, for the left, the word “safe” has nothing to do with, well, safety, and everything to do with censorship.

Let’s define the terms. Safe Space: noun, 1. progressive circle of self-entitled, everyone-gets-a-trophy basement-dwellers sheltered from critical thinking, differing opinions, reality and oxygen.

With its new initiative, Twitter says it seeks to “strike the right balance between fighting abuse and speaking truth to power.”

What, exactly, constitutes “abuse,” “truth” and “power” remains to be seen, but, based on Twitter’s long history of blacklisting and “unverifying” conservatives from its rolls, I think we all know who gets shafted on this.

“To ensure people can continue to express themselves freely and safely on Twitter, we must provide more tools and policies,” the company claims. “Twitter does not tolerate behavior intended to harass, intimidate, or use fear to silence another user’s voice.”

Color me über-skeptical, but as Daniel Payne observes over at The Federalist, “Twitter already allows its users to either mute or block anyone who is being bothersome or threatening. There is no practical necessity for a ‘council’ to make people feel ‘safe’ on Twitter. Blocking is an effective tool for anyone who needs it. You can always report to the Twitter staff the rare troll who just won’t give up.

“The seemingly superfluous formation of a ‘Trust and Safety Council,’ then, suggests a kind of procedural overhaul of Twitter’s internal speech policy,” concludes Payne.

I agree.

Indeed, to the fragile liberal mind, any disagreement with its rigid, and decidedly one-sided, brand of “tolerance” and “diversity” constitutes “behavior intended to harass” or “intimidate.” To those who cannot win an argument on the merits, the path of least resistance is to silence all dissent.

Yet, if there was any question as to whether Twitter will be adopting the above-referenced definition of “safe space” in its effort to make tweeters “feel safe,” that question is immediately resolved by virtue of whom it has deputized. While there are a handful of legitimate, left-of-center anti-bullying organizations on the “council,” the list is likewise comprised up a rag-tag gaggle of fringe “progressive” groups like Feminist Frequency and GLAAD (formerly the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation).

Conspicuously absent is even one conservative or Christian organization.

So, what will GLAAD and the rest of the “Tweet Police” be doing? It’s hard to say for sure since Twitter won’t, but, considering what GLAAD already does, we can venture a fair guess.

GLAAD is an extremist homosexual censorship group that, for its defamatory antics, was certified last year by the well-respected American Family Association as an “openly bigoted anti-Christian organization.” GLAAD’s primary purpose is to strong-arm the entertainment industry and news media into presenting unrealistically favorable portrayals of the homosexual and gender-confused lifestyles, while at once censoring positive portrayals of natural marriage and the natural family, and silencing those who hold biblical values relative to marriage and human sexuality.

One of GLAAD’s most troubling censorship efforts was its Orwellian “Commentator Accountability Project.” This was a desperate effort to “suppress the biblical worldview from media.” Various homosexual activists were conscripted to contact, badger and otherwise intimidate media outlets, such as CNN, Fox News, the New York Times, et al., into blacklisting leading Christian cultural analysts (yours truly included) from providing commentary and political analysis over the airwaves and in print.

While the smear campaign ultimately failed, it did betray, for all the world to see, GLAAD’s overt designs on anti-conservative, anti-Christian censorship. And now it has its grubby little rainbow-hued fingerprints all over one of the world’s largest and most popular social networking sites.

Enjoy your Twitter free speech while you can, conservative Christians. Your tweets are birds on a wire, and GLAAD’s got the pellet gun.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/twitter-enlists-gay-thought-police/#s7miWMYOWestAYhq.99

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 06:18:39   #
Kevyn
 
no propaganda please wrote:
PULLING NO PUNCHES
Twitter enlists 'gay' thought police
Exclusive: Matt Barber notes anti-Christian GLAAD now helping to censor site
Published: 1 day ago

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/05/Matt-Barber_avatar.jpg
author-image Matt Barber About | Email | Archive
Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber).


This cannot be good for free speech and the open exchange of ideas. Not for Christians and conservatives anyway.

Twitter announced on Wednesday that it has assembled a new “Twitter Trust & Safety Council” to “ensure that people feel safe expressing themselves on Twitter.”

Who’s for safety?

Yay safety!

Still, we need only look to the so-called “safe space” craze on America’s college campuses to gain a glimpse into what Twitter undoubtedly means here. Understand that, for the left, the word “safe” has nothing to do with, well, safety, and everything to do with censorship.

Let’s define the terms. Safe Space: noun, 1. progressive circle of self-entitled, everyone-gets-a-trophy basement-dwellers sheltered from critical thinking, differing opinions, reality and oxygen.

With its new initiative, Twitter says it seeks to “strike the right balance between fighting abuse and speaking truth to power.”

What, exactly, constitutes “abuse,” “truth” and “power” remains to be seen, but, based on Twitter’s long history of blacklisting and “unverifying” conservatives from its rolls, I think we all know who gets shafted on this.

“To ensure people can continue to express themselves freely and safely on Twitter, we must provide more tools and policies,” the company claims. “Twitter does not tolerate behavior intended to harass, intimidate, or use fear to silence another user’s voice.”

Color me über-skeptical, but as Daniel Payne observes over at The Federalist, “Twitter already allows its users to either mute or block anyone who is being bothersome or threatening. There is no practical necessity for a ‘council’ to make people feel ‘safe’ on Twitter. Blocking is an effective tool for anyone who needs it. You can always report to the Twitter staff the rare troll who just won’t give up.

“The seemingly superfluous formation of a ‘Trust and Safety Council,’ then, suggests a kind of procedural overhaul of Twitter’s internal speech policy,” concludes Payne.

I agree.

Indeed, to the fragile liberal mind, any disagreement with its rigid, and decidedly one-sided, brand of “tolerance” and “diversity” constitutes “behavior intended to harass” or “intimidate.” To those who cannot win an argument on the merits, the path of least resistance is to silence all dissent.

Yet, if there was any question as to whether Twitter will be adopting the above-referenced definition of “safe space” in its effort to make tweeters “feel safe,” that question is immediately resolved by virtue of whom it has deputized. While there are a handful of legitimate, left-of-center anti-bullying organizations on the “council,” the list is likewise comprised up a rag-tag gaggle of fringe “progressive” groups like Feminist Frequency and GLAAD (formerly the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation).

Conspicuously absent is even one conservative or Christian organization.

So, what will GLAAD and the rest of the “Tweet Police” be doing? It’s hard to say for sure since Twitter won’t, but, considering what GLAAD already does, we can venture a fair guess.

GLAAD is an extremist homosexual censorship group that, for its defamatory antics, was certified last year by the well-respected American Family Association as an “openly bigoted anti-Christian organization.” GLAAD’s primary purpose is to strong-arm the entertainment industry and news media into presenting unrealistically favorable portrayals of the homosexual and gender-confused lifestyles, while at once censoring positive portrayals of natural marriage and the natural family, and silencing those who hold biblical values relative to marriage and human sexuality.

One of GLAAD’s most troubling censorship efforts was its Orwellian “Commentator Accountability Project.” This was a desperate effort to “suppress the biblical worldview from media.” Various homosexual activists were conscripted to contact, badger and otherwise intimidate media outlets, such as CNN, Fox News, the New York Times, et al., into blacklisting leading Christian cultural analysts (yours truly included) from providing commentary and political analysis over the airwaves and in print.

While the smear campaign ultimately failed, it did betray, for all the world to see, GLAAD’s overt designs on anti-conservative, anti-Christian censorship. And now it has its grubby little rainbow-hued fingerprints all over one of the world’s largest and most popular social networking sites.

Enjoy your Twitter free speech while you can, conservative Christians. Your tweets are birds on a wire, and GLAAD’s got the pellet gun.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/twitter-enlists-gay-thought-police/#s7miWMYOWestAYhq.99
PULLING NO PUNCHES br Twitter enlists 'gay' though... (show quote)
Twitter is a private company, they can do as they damn well please. What are you some sort of commie suggesting differently?

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 06:23:31   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Kevyn wrote:
Twitter is a private company, they can do as they damn well please. What are you some sort of commie suggesting differently?


But a Christian owned company that make cake IS NOT allowed to refuse making a "wedding" cake to celebrate homosexual behavior which, according to their religion, is a major sin.

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2016 06:53:05   #
Kevyn
 
no propaganda please wrote:
But a Christian owned company that make cake IS NOT allowed to refuse making a "wedding" cake to celebrate homosexual behavior which, according to their religion, is a major sin.

One company discriminates against people the other won't allow discrimination, how can you not see the difference?

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 07:22:10   #
Olivia Rose
 
They need new people. This is called shock value.
Who gives a sh*t what your sexual preference is, just keep it personal.

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 08:00:17   #
rebob14
 
no propaganda please wrote:
PULLING NO PUNCHES
Twitter enlists 'gay' thought police
Exclusive: Matt Barber notes anti-Christian GLAAD now helping to censor site
Published: 1 day ago

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/05/Matt-Barber_avatar.jpg
author-image Matt Barber About | Email | Archive
Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber).


This cannot be good for free speech and the open exchange of ideas. Not for Christians and conservatives anyway.

Twitter announced on Wednesday that it has assembled a new “Twitter Trust & Safety Council” to “ensure that people feel safe expressing themselves on Twitter.”

Who’s for safety?

Yay safety!

Still, we need only look to the so-called “safe space” craze on America’s college campuses to gain a glimpse into what Twitter undoubtedly means here. Understand that, for the left, the word “safe” has nothing to do with, well, safety, and everything to do with censorship.

Let’s define the terms. Safe Space: noun, 1. progressive circle of self-entitled, everyone-gets-a-trophy basement-dwellers sheltered from critical thinking, differing opinions, reality and oxygen.

With its new initiative, Twitter says it seeks to “strike the right balance between fighting abuse and speaking truth to power.”

What, exactly, constitutes “abuse,” “truth” and “power” remains to be seen, but, based on Twitter’s long history of blacklisting and “unverifying” conservatives from its rolls, I think we all know who gets shafted on this.

“To ensure people can continue to express themselves freely and safely on Twitter, we must provide more tools and policies,” the company claims. “Twitter does not tolerate behavior intended to harass, intimidate, or use fear to silence another user’s voice.”

Color me über-skeptical, but as Daniel Payne observes over at The Federalist, “Twitter already allows its users to either mute or block anyone who is being bothersome or threatening. There is no practical necessity for a ‘council’ to make people feel ‘safe’ on Twitter. Blocking is an effective tool for anyone who needs it. You can always report to the Twitter staff the rare troll who just won’t give up.

“The seemingly superfluous formation of a ‘Trust and Safety Council,’ then, suggests a kind of procedural overhaul of Twitter’s internal speech policy,” concludes Payne.

I agree.

Indeed, to the fragile liberal mind, any disagreement with its rigid, and decidedly one-sided, brand of “tolerance” and “diversity” constitutes “behavior intended to harass” or “intimidate.” To those who cannot win an argument on the merits, the path of least resistance is to silence all dissent.

Yet, if there was any question as to whether Twitter will be adopting the above-referenced definition of “safe space” in its effort to make tweeters “feel safe,” that question is immediately resolved by virtue of whom it has deputized. While there are a handful of legitimate, left-of-center anti-bullying organizations on the “council,” the list is likewise comprised up a rag-tag gaggle of fringe “progressive” groups like Feminist Frequency and GLAAD (formerly the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation).

Conspicuously absent is even one conservative or Christian organization.

So, what will GLAAD and the rest of the “Tweet Police” be doing? It’s hard to say for sure since Twitter won’t, but, considering what GLAAD already does, we can venture a fair guess.

GLAAD is an extremist homosexual censorship group that, for its defamatory antics, was certified last year by the well-respected American Family Association as an “openly bigoted anti-Christian organization.” GLAAD’s primary purpose is to strong-arm the entertainment industry and news media into presenting unrealistically favorable portrayals of the homosexual and gender-confused lifestyles, while at once censoring positive portrayals of natural marriage and the natural family, and silencing those who hold biblical values relative to marriage and human sexuality.

One of GLAAD’s most troubling censorship efforts was its Orwellian “Commentator Accountability Project.” This was a desperate effort to “suppress the biblical worldview from media.” Various homosexual activists were conscripted to contact, badger and otherwise intimidate media outlets, such as CNN, Fox News, the New York Times, et al., into blacklisting leading Christian cultural analysts (yours truly included) from providing commentary and political analysis over the airwaves and in print.

While the smear campaign ultimately failed, it did betray, for all the world to see, GLAAD’s overt designs on anti-conservative, anti-Christian censorship. And now it has its grubby little rainbow-hued fingerprints all over one of the world’s largest and most popular social networking sites.

Enjoy your Twitter free speech while you can, conservative Christians. Your tweets are birds on a wire, and GLAAD’s got the pellet gun.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/twitter-enlists-gay-thought-police/#s7miWMYOWestAYhq.99
PULLING NO PUNCHES br Twitter enlists 'gay' though... (show quote)


Fifty plus years ago, the word "twit" had a meaning and expressed a sentiment 180 degrees out from todays'. Only an organization with that name could have come up with this insanity. Two hundred years from now, when historians teach about the fall of great civilizations they will be astonished at the totality and speed of the collapse of western societies. Rome resisted for centuries under pressures much greater than we have faced - we have raced to the edge and jumped off with hardly thinking about what was happening. But.......what am I thinking? The true account of these times will have been scrubbed and nobody will be teaching much of anything.

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 08:11:18   #
Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich
 
no propaganda please wrote:
PULLING NO PUNCHES
Twitter enlists 'gay' thought police
Exclusive: Matt Barber notes anti-Christian GLAAD now helping to censor site
Published: 1 day ago

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/05/Matt-Barber_avatar.jpg
author-image Matt Barber About | Email | Archive
Matt Barber is founder and editor-in chief of BarbWire.com. He is an author, columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war. (Follow Matt on Twitter: @jmattbarber).


This cannot be good for free speech and the open exchange of ideas. Not for Christians and conservatives anyway.

Twitter announced on Wednesday that it has assembled a new “Twitter Trust & Safety Council” to “ensure that people feel safe expressing themselves on Twitter.”

Who’s for safety?

Yay safety!

Still, we need only look to the so-called “safe space” craze on America’s college campuses to gain a glimpse into what Twitter undoubtedly means here. Understand that, for the left, the word “safe” has nothing to do with, well, safety, and everything to do with censorship.

Let’s define the terms. Safe Space: noun, 1. progressive circle of self-entitled, everyone-gets-a-trophy basement-dwellers sheltered from critical thinking, differing opinions, reality and oxygen.

With its new initiative, Twitter says it seeks to “strike the right balance between fighting abuse and speaking truth to power.”

What, exactly, constitutes “abuse,” “truth” and “power” remains to be seen, but, based on Twitter’s long history of blacklisting and “unverifying” conservatives from its rolls, I think we all know who gets shafted on this.

“To ensure people can continue to express themselves freely and safely on Twitter, we must provide more tools and policies,” the company claims. “Twitter does not tolerate behavior intended to harass, intimidate, or use fear to silence another user’s voice.”

Color me über-skeptical, but as Daniel Payne observes over at The Federalist, “Twitter already allows its users to either mute or block anyone who is being bothersome or threatening. There is no practical necessity for a ‘council’ to make people feel ‘safe’ on Twitter. Blocking is an effective tool for anyone who needs it. You can always report to the Twitter staff the rare troll who just won’t give up.

“The seemingly superfluous formation of a ‘Trust and Safety Council,’ then, suggests a kind of procedural overhaul of Twitter’s internal speech policy,” concludes Payne.

I agree.

Indeed, to the fragile liberal mind, any disagreement with its rigid, and decidedly one-sided, brand of “tolerance” and “diversity” constitutes “behavior intended to harass” or “intimidate.” To those who cannot win an argument on the merits, the path of least resistance is to silence all dissent.

Yet, if there was any question as to whether Twitter will be adopting the above-referenced definition of “safe space” in its effort to make tweeters “feel safe,” that question is immediately resolved by virtue of whom it has deputized. While there are a handful of legitimate, left-of-center anti-bullying organizations on the “council,” the list is likewise comprised up a rag-tag gaggle of fringe “progressive” groups like Feminist Frequency and GLAAD (formerly the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation).

Conspicuously absent is even one conservative or Christian organization.

So, what will GLAAD and the rest of the “Tweet Police” be doing? It’s hard to say for sure since Twitter won’t, but, considering what GLAAD already does, we can venture a fair guess.

GLAAD is an extremist homosexual censorship group that, for its defamatory antics, was certified last year by the well-respected American Family Association as an “openly bigoted anti-Christian organization.” GLAAD’s primary purpose is to strong-arm the entertainment industry and news media into presenting unrealistically favorable portrayals of the homosexual and gender-confused lifestyles, while at once censoring positive portrayals of natural marriage and the natural family, and silencing those who hold biblical values relative to marriage and human sexuality.

One of GLAAD’s most troubling censorship efforts was its Orwellian “Commentator Accountability Project.” This was a desperate effort to “suppress the biblical worldview from media.” Various homosexual activists were conscripted to contact, badger and otherwise intimidate media outlets, such as CNN, Fox News, the New York Times, et al., into blacklisting leading Christian cultural analysts (yours truly included) from providing commentary and political analysis over the airwaves and in print.

While the smear campaign ultimately failed, it did betray, for all the world to see, GLAAD’s overt designs on anti-conservative, anti-Christian censorship. And now it has its grubby little rainbow-hued fingerprints all over one of the world’s largest and most popular social networking sites.

Enjoy your Twitter free speech while you can, conservative Christians. Your tweets are birds on a wire, and GLAAD’s got the pellet gun.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/twitter-enlists-gay-thought-police/#s7miWMYOWestAYhq.99
PULLING NO PUNCHES br Twitter enlists 'gay' though... (show quote)


In an attempt to cut to the chase, & eliminate all the "flora, & fauna" of educated English legalese:

MAYBE "CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS, CAN "SHIT IN THE EYE OF TWITTER IDIOTS", BEFORE THEY CAN "PULL THE TRIGGER"? :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2016 08:15:37   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Kevyn wrote:
One company discriminates against people the other won't allow discrimination, how can you not see the difference?


Of course you mean the Christians and conservatives are being discriminated against by being denied representation and the bakery being forced too violate their religion are also victims of discrimination.You almost had it right.

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 08:23:46   #
Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich
 
Hemiman wrote:
Of course you mean the Christians and conservatives are being discriminated against by being denied representation and the bakery being forced too violate their religion are also victims of discrimination.You almost had it right.


{ story of "kevyn's sad life......."never could get it right"!............ :oops: :oops: :cry: :cry: :thumbdown: }

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 11:43:47   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Hemiman wrote:
Of course you mean the Christians and conservatives are being discriminated against by being denied representation and the bakery being forced too violate their religion are also victims of discrimination.You almost had it right.


It is my observation that Kevyn believes that only Islam cannot be discriminated against and that is probably because their punishment for insulting Mohammed is to be beheaded. Christians, on the other hand , will show you God's love and help you control your desire so you can become a better person. Kevyn has no intention, apparently, of controlling any of his impulses.

Reply
Feb 14, 2016 11:56:15   #
73STNGLKABEE
 
There is no difference ding dong, like you said, they are a privately owned company, they can do as they please, thank you hypocrite.

Kevyn wrote:
One company discriminates against people the other won't allow discrimination, how can you not see the difference?

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2016 11:52:48   #
Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich
 
73STNGLKABEE wrote:
There is no difference ding dong, like you said, they are a privately owned company, they can do as they please, thank you hypocrite.


SIMPLY "IGNORE", EVERYPOST "KEVYN" PLACES HERE.......HE IS A HOPELESS IDIOT, NO MORALS, & NO COMMON SENSE!

Reply
Feb 15, 2016 17:44:35   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Kevyn wrote:
One company discriminates against people the other won't allow discrimination, how can you not see the difference?


From what I read there was no talk of discrimination in the article. It stated that they wanted people to be able to express themselves freely and safely. There was no mention of discrimination.

Reply
Feb 15, 2016 17:46:19   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
rebob14 wrote:
Fifty plus years ago, the word "twit" had a meaning and expressed a sentiment 180 degrees out from todays'. Only an organization with that name could have come up with this insanity. Two hundred years from now, when historians teach about the fall of great civilizations they will be astonished at the totality and speed of the collapse of western societies. Rome resisted for centuries under pressures much greater than we have faced - we have raced to the edge and jumped off with hardly thinking about what was happening. But.......what am I thinking? The true account of these times will have been scrubbed and nobody will be teaching much of anything.
Fifty plus years ago, the word "twit" ha... (show quote)


If the liberals have their way!!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 15, 2016 17:47:05   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Hemiman wrote:
Of course you mean the Christians and conservatives are being discriminated against by being denied representation and the bakery being forced too violate their religion are also victims of discrimination.You almost had it right.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.