Canadian gun control: Going the e-mail rounds. Canadian Gun Control Think about this.....it could happen right here......whether you agree or not, it's still in our constitution...

Elwood Loc: Florida

Going the e-mail rounds.

Canadian Gun Control

Think about this.....it could happen right here......whether you agree or not, it's still in our constitution ....arms......pray that we don't ever loose
that right...."when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns"....and when seconds count...the police are only minutes away.....

Revolution may be the answer.

GOD FORBID THIS HAPPENS IN THE UNITED

STATES...Watch this one.

Here is what we, in the USA, have to worry

about in the near future.

Canadian gun control. Worth the watch!

Please keep this one going! We must protect our rights for if this happens

Americans will be targets for any criminal for they will have guns. More fearful is we will not be able to protect ourselves from the tyrannical Government, the reason we have the 2nd Amendment.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/03XEUPfD0qM

Loki Loc: Georgia

Elwood wrote:

Going the e-mail rounds. br br br Canadian Gun ... (show quote)

The Obama Administration's attempts to create a National Registry fly in the face of the 1986 legislation which forbids it. This bastard is attempting to circumvent Federal Law by fiat. Ted Cruz has promised to rescind every one of Obama's illegal or questionable EOs his first day in office. This includes not only the Amnesties, but the gun control EOs. While Trump has maintained his belief in the Second Amendment, two years ago he was in favor of the ban on so-called "Assault Rifles."

Elwood Loc: Florida

Loki wrote:

The Obama Administration's attempts to create a Na... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :-D I am still for Trump. :mrgreen:

Loki Loc: Georgia

Elwood wrote:

:thumbup: :thumbup: :-D I am still for Trump. :mrgreen:

Just remember that Trump's conservative creds are about 2 years old, he was mostly a Democrat supporter until then. Cruz has been a solid conservative all along.

Elwood Loc: Florida

Loki wrote:

Just remember that Trump's conservative creds are about 2 years old, he was mostly a Democrat supporter until then. Cruz has been a solid conservative all along.

So what. Reagan was a democrat before he saw the light. I am looking at someone with solid business experience and showing the middle finger to the establishment and all the assholes that are screwing up this country. The conservatives have been as responsible for screwing up this country as all those damned liberturds. We need a new direction and Cruz is not the man nor are Rubio and Bush. :hunf:

Loki Loc: Georgia

Elwood wrote:

So what. Reagan was a democrat before he saw the light. I am looking at someone with solid business experience and showing the middle finger to the establishment and all the assholes that are screwing up this country. The conservatives have been as responsible for screwing up this country as all those damned liberturds. We need a new direction and Cruz is not the man nor are Rubio and Bush. :hunf:

Reagan did not have an all of a sudden epiphany like Paul on the road to Damascus. He did not go from Liberal to Conservative in the blink of an eye. Maybe Trump will do as he says. If he wins, I hope so.

Elwood Loc: Florida

Loki wrote:

Reagan did not have an all of a sudden epiphany like Paul on the road to Damascus. He did not go from Liberal to Conservative in the blink of an eye. Maybe Trump will do as he says. If he wins, I hope so.

I believe that he will. The stuff he has been saying today differs very little from what he said 25 years ago. I have more faith in him that all the other politicians running. I like Carson but not for president. He would make a fine Secretary of Health. :mrgreen:

Loki Loc: Georgia

Elwood wrote:

I believe that he will. The stuff he has been saying today differs very little from what he said 25 years ago. I have more faith in him that all the other politicians running. I like Carson but not for president. He would make a fine Secretary of Health. :mrgreen:

Two years ago he supported renewing the Clinton Gun Ban. Two years ago he was not nearly so opposed to amnesty. He still supports single payer health care. He is not the one who proposed abolishing Income Tax and replacing it with the Fair Tax, Cruz is.

Elwood Loc: Florida

Loki wrote:

Two years ago he supported renewing the Clinton Gun Ban. Two years ago he was not nearly so opposed to amnesty. He still supports single payer health care. He is not the one who proposed abolishing Income Tax and replacing it with the Fair Tax, Cruz is.

We shall see how it works out.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Elwood wrote:

We shall see how it works out.

Should Trump get the nomination, I truly hope you are right.

robmull Loc: florida

Loki wrote:

Two years ago he supported renewing the Clinton Gun Ban. Two years ago he was not nearly so opposed to amnesty. He still supports single payer health care. He is not the one who proposed abolishing Income Tax and replacing it with the Fair Tax, Cruz is.

I'm a "recovered" liberal [John Kerry - how embarrassing] so I know that if there was EVER a reason to jump-off the (D) plantation, Loki, it's now. I like Cruz more than Trump currently because of Glenn Beck's strong analogy and long-term conservative ["classic liberal"] diligence in all things politics. I rather like someone who doesn't have to change stripes at election time, Cruz; but I also know that the "change" did me good. And actually I rather like ALL the (R) candidates, [but for Bush] and would vote for ANY (R) nominated to stop the "BHB" 3rd term of "fundamental transformation" in America with either the professed socialist/communist, Sanders, or the aged "un-American activities," advocates [communist ideology] "Rose Law Firm" [fully knowledgeable] apprentice, Hillary.

The choice for America in this next election is profound, and the voting "fraud" that has become the "taqiyya" mantle in Muslim and "Banana" Republic communist countries has quietly and deceptively slithered into the secular liberal progressive "Machiavellian" spirit [or lack thereof] in America that allows communist Labor Unions [SEIU] to adjust [tune-up] the voting booths, formerly non-partisan branches of the federal government to deny "tax-exempt" status to the "enemy," ["BHB"] conservatives, while contributing huge sums of money [ONLY] to (D) candidates and Party, and somehow [in 2012] end-up with 125% - yup, you see that right, 125% of the vote going (D) in certain cities; and "0%" going (R). How does THAT happen???

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

Elwood wrote:

Going the e-mail rounds. br br br Canadian Gun ... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

I wouldn't "follow Canada's lead" in anything! Bernie Sanders should be running for office there!

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

Loki wrote:

Just remember that Trump's conservative creds are about 2 years old, he was mostly a Democrat supporter until then. Cruz has been a solid conservative all along.

I've always supported Cruz. I don't trust Trump (as I've said here before). My only worry is the controversy of "eligibility". I would be hard-pressed to come up with a "second good choice".

rebob14

Elwood wrote:

Going the e-mail rounds. br br br Canadian Gun ... (show quote)

Registry is illegal, and, if you got your gun through a FFL license holder, that record, by law, must be destroyed in 30 days.

Loki Loc: Georgia

snowbear37 wrote:

I've always supported Cruz. I don't trust Trump (as I've said here before). My only worry is the controversy of "eligibility". I would be hard-pressed to come up with a "second good choice".

One last time, Cruz is natural born, as per 8 USC section 1401. He meets all the qualifications set forth in US Law. Operative US law in 1970 stated that a person born abroad to one US citizen parent is a citizen at birth, with no need for any sort of naturalization procedure. This is the definition of natural born. He was technically a natural born citizen of 2 countries, since Canadian law provides that anyone born in Canada is a natural born Canadian citizen. Contrary to some of the bullshit being posted here, Canadian law allowed dual US/Canadian Citizenship in 1970, when Cruz was born. The definition of born in the US to 2 citizen parents is the one offered by Emmerich de Vattel, a Swiss philosopher, in his 1758 book The Law of Nations. He was never even a US citizen. The Supreme Court has held that his definition satisfies the conditions for natural born, but that is not the only way. There has never been a Supreme Court decision on this subject, in spite of the fact that James Buchanan in the 1850's, Chester Arthur in the 1880's, and Barack Obama did not meet these purists' imaginary requirements. Nor were the qualifications of George Romney, or Barry Goldwater in the sixties, or John McCain in 2008 ever questioned.