To be clear, Cruz would easily be my choice if he could clear up the cloud of eligibility.

You are wrong, Trump's mother was a naturalized U. S. citizen at the time of his birth.

Our guy Cruz needs to aggressively move to clear up the eligibility question as soon as possible. I think he is trying to evade the issue because he knows he can't meet the requirements of Natural Born Citizen and he is hoping to slide by by avoiding the problem. Big mistake. A lot of potential Cruz voters will not vote for him just because of the constitutional eligibility question hanging over his head. They are the people who firmly and quietly believe that Obama is also ineligible and oppose O on principle. It the principle applies to O, it applies to Cruz.

He can't afford to lose these votes, but he will lose them unless something is done to remove the question soon.

I want to vote for him, but I can't as things stand right now.

To be clear, Cruz would easily be my choice if he could clear up the cloud of eligibility.

You are wrong, Trump's mother was a naturalized U. S. citizen at the time of his birth.

Our guy Cruz needs to aggressively move to clear up the eligibility question as soon as possible. I think he is trying to evade the issue because he knows he can't meet the requirements of Natural Born Citizen and he is hoping to slide by by avoiding the problem. Big mistake. A lot of potential Cruz voters will not vote for him just because of the constitutional eligibility question hanging over his head. They are the people who firmly and quietly believe that Obama is also ineligible and oppose O on principle. It the principle applies to O, it applies to Cruz.

He can't afford to lose these votes, but he will lose them unless something is done to remove the question soon.

I want to vote for him, but I can't as things stand right now.

So says you LAP;
Some people actually make an effort to get the facts, digest them, and then come to their own conclusions.
A whole lot there to reflect on.
Who here really wants a true conservative in the White House.
I sure do. But not another fraud.
America can't afford another fraud.

MEET HEIDI CRUZ - TED'S NEW WORLD ORDER WIFE
http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001Jc66dPwglSDNSulG4W4j_BuUQs73EWYz08GM6UibVUuYBzP1xndyC6aL3yHVGxKdp22ZooU8R5XLHGgJhLvzkU78zwsIlOdurhfOIoOZRltB6zSrADGs_cdyuknxsEN3nrvN5GG5_B8XgWQ9Wtrzil-GmuJ7znV8W5Z-W9Xi27IZNj-xSzEup7mdF0IP-LVH&c=nKaX-8CAkJ5z_evlE--GifvkaIquh4eMuDLDBfScpdMgWgsGw6_cJg==&ch=F8pvxmMLq0hcKakK94CBIC4uZoGvO8TxT5TrVtib8Q5ghaRy5MHe-Q==

Please tell me what is not true in this article.

Thanks for mentioning that sisu>

From a Texan:

I would never ever vote for Cruz. I explained it before, but when Cruz was Solicitor General for George W. Bush back in the days as part of Bush's legal team when he was Governor of Texas, Cruz went right along with the stance and decision of Bush and his then Attorney General, Dan Morales, that Republic of Texas members had no constitutional rights and were to be persecuted and penalized out of existence and the entire hundreds of thousands of us to be found and sought out and rounded up into jail at a fine of over $10,000 a day and for "contempt" of court when we wouldn't of couldn't pay it. Bush and Morales, and Cruz was right there and mentioned as being involved, released a press release about this from the Governor's and the Attorney General's offices when questioned by reporters and each said and indicated that the First Amendment Right of Freedom of Association didn't apply to Republic of Texas members when they sought the private membership lists of all Republic of Texas/Texas Citizens from the Republic of Texas leadership in the Texas Supreme Court. And they stated their intent was to seek out and find and jail all Republic of Texas members/citizens and basically hound and persecute all of us into jail just for exercising our basic rights of freedom of association and freedom of political beliefs or affiliation to politically separate ourselves from the U.S and become the independent Republic of Texas again, merely because our leaders in the RT filed a multi-trillion dollar lien against state of Texas officials and the U.S. government for numerous fraudulent acts against Texas and its people going back 175 years over the issue. This was their response to try to crush us, and it didn't work, even the Texas State Supreme Court ruled against them. And Ted Cruz was the POS piece of shit taco greaser opportunist scum right there in the press as Solicitor General, supporting and condoning and making statements in support of both Governor George W. Bush and Attorney General Dan Morales who filed the motion in the Texas Supreme Court. As a so-called "constitutional scholar", he was the One who wrote the brief for Bush and Morales that RT members have no First Amendment rights or protection of freedom of association or political beliefs, and he was proud of it. some so-called "constitutional scholar" he is. They all 3 in the press at the time, Bush, Morales and Cruz, when asked by the reporters, also stated by way of Morales as the spokesperson for this group of 3 miscreants that "the Constitution didn't apply to us (RT Citizens) and was just a worthless scrap of paper that they could ignore at any time, saying that it and the 1st Amendment would only apply "whenever 'we' decided it does or want it to, and in this case 'we' decide it doesn't". Incredible admission, but true. This was in the late 90's around 1996-1997, and I was there in Texas at the time, as a part of the RT, and so I know. Does that sound familiar? Bush said much later in about 2006 or so, that "the Constitution is just a god-damn piece of paper". I tried to warn everybody then that Bush, Morales and Cruz were just worthless pieces of scum and tyrants that nobody should vote for and get them out of office now, and prosecute them all for fraud and corruption and other crimes against the people of Texas, but every then was just too dimwitted and asleep and didn't give a damn, they just wanted to hear what they wanted to hear and accept only what these 3 morons and liars said without fact checking them, and look what we've got now!


Cruz was also involved with Bush and Morales in other corruption cases when he was Solicitor General as Bush's right hand legal man along with Morales, that came to light then when Bush was governor of Texas. In one of them, Dan Morales the AG was found guilty and sent to jail for years, and I don't know if he is still there in state prison or not. They should have got Bush and Cruz also way back then, but didn't, especially over the RT case massive persecution and illegal harassment of Texas citizens.



Cruz is nothing but an opportunist and will even turn on whoever his backers are once he is done with them, as he has actually and apparently already done, even to the Bush family as their prodigy, and Rockefeller, incredibly. Can we trust him to do as he claims he will as promised if elected, and that his knowledge,as pundits and his supporters now claim, of the Constitution is eminent? No! In no way or sense! He's NOT a real conservative, and he's been caught in several lies, deceptions and evasions, including over his Canadian citizenship of his mother and father, and not being a Natural Born citizen of the U.S. who could even qualify as such to run for the office of U.S. President. He's not a constitutional scholar. He is just a political opportunist who has studied the Constitution to gain just enough knowledge of the Constitution to learn how to get around it, just like many judges, prosecutors and attorney and policemen do. We don't need another Obama. A real Constitutional Scholar will be true and honest and a lover and a fierce advocate of the Constitution, like Jefferson was, no matter what, and Cruz fits the bill here on no count.