One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
For The 9/11 Conspiracy Wackos
This topic is locked to prevent further replies.
Page <<first <prev 15 of 99 next> last>>
Dec 19, 2015 11:44:07   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
payne1000 wrote:
Typical for you would be your sniper or exploding watermelon avatar.


You mean like this?

Splat
Splat...

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 11:49:13   #
trucksterbud
 
Just to point out here Mr. Pee, for you to state that Mr. Silverstein paid out the amount to reconstruct the towers, is akin to saying that after an accident in your car, you are required to pay out the amount to fix / replace the car. How much sense does that make..?? Do you realize the statement you made invalidates itself..?? Like I said, Aetna Financial and AIG carried the insurance. So, putting 2+2 together, in your own words - however misinformed now they may be - who really paid the INSURANCE costs to rebuild the towers.

And for any interested there was a METAL ENGINEER and a STRUCTURAL ENGINEER who validate the theory that the charges of THERMITE were placed at exactly the proper places to perform a structural demolition - from the top down. Its all on the CAFR1 site

Again: http://www.CAFR1.com/911engineersspeakout

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 12:00:00   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
payne1000 wrote:
Typical for you would be your sniper or exploding watermelon avatar.


Actually' this is more relative to your personally.



Reply
 
 
Dec 19, 2015 12:03:07   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
trucksterbud wrote:
Just to point out here Mr. Pee, for you to state that Mr. Silverstein paid out the amount to reconstruct the towers, is akin to saying that after an accident in your car, you are required to pay out the amount to fix / replace the car. How much sense does that make..?? Do you realize the statement you made invalidates itself..?? Like I said, Aetna Financial and AIG carried the insurance. So, putting 2+2 together, in your own words - however misinformed now they may be - who really paid the INSURANCE costs to rebuild the towers.

And for any interested there was a METAL ENGINEER and a STRUCTURAL ENGINEER who validate the theory that the charges of THERMITE were placed at exactly the proper places to perform a structural demolition - from the top down. Its all on the CAFR1 site

Again: http://www.CAFR1.com/911engineersspeakout
Just to point out here Mr. Pee, for you to state t... (show quote)


Different policies, different requirements. Oh, and your link has been removed. Oops.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 12:29:42   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
payne1000 wrote:
Amadjuster--a troll from my past from another forum.
PrairieSeasons and Wilpharm preceded you in coming to this forum. Your fellow trolls on this forum are almost as nasty and obnoxious as yourself. Wasn't your real identity exposed on the "Attic" forum? I think there's even a photo of you available.
Maybe I'll post it since you once posted my photo.


Is this you?



Reply
Dec 19, 2015 13:01:27   #
payne1000
 
VladimirPee wrote:
I see a building in collapse. From everything I have read about controlled demo the interior is stripped down so they can access the girders and supports. In smaller buildings 100s of well placed charges must be placed so I assume in the WTC 1000s needed to be placed. There is no evidence of any stripping on the interior. No tenants reporting workers tearing out sheetrock or floors. Do you realize this could not have been done without being obvious to tenants? 20,000 people worked in the WTC
I see a building in collapse. From everything I h... (show quote)


If the towers collapsed, where were the 110 floors of concrete in the debris on the ground? 110 floors of 4" thick concrete would have covered all the other debris. How do you explain the concrete floors being pulverized to dust? Where are all the trusses which held up the concrete?







Reply
Dec 19, 2015 13:03:55   #
payne1000
 
amadjuster wrote:
Is this you?


Can you just once comment on the topic? Did you only sign up to this forum in order to insult me?

Reply
 
 
Dec 19, 2015 13:05:39   #
payne1000
 
amadjuster wrote:
Actually' this is more relative to your personally.


You're having a problem with English. Is English your second language?



Reply
Dec 19, 2015 13:07:59   #
payne1000
 
amadjuster wrote:
You mean like this?


Now readers need to see you as a sniper hiding in the weeds.
That image better expresses your mindset.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 13:26:14   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
payne1000 wrote:
Now readers need to see you as a sniper hiding in the weeds.
That image better expresses your mindset.


Sorry to inform you of this unfortunate observation but you consistently run around in circles with a bulls eye painted front and back screaming, "shoot me, shoot me, shoot me." No sniper skills required for this turkey shoot.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 13:54:22   #
VladimirPee
 
Do you realize the World Trade Center is owned by the Port Authority of NYNJ and that Mr. Silverstein had to use the insure proceeds to rebuild it for them. He didn't get to keep the money. My statement makes perfect sense. Your 7 billion profit does not.

trucksterbud wrote:
Just to point out here Mr. Pee, for you to state that Mr. Silverstein paid out the amount to reconstruct the towers, is akin to saying that after an accident in your car, you are required to pay out the amount to fix / replace the car. How much sense does that make..?? Do you realize the statement you made invalidates itself..?? Like I said, Aetna Financial and AIG carried the insurance. So, putting 2+2 together, in your own words - however misinformed now they may be - who really paid the INSURANCE costs to rebuild the towers.

And for any interested there was a METAL ENGINEER and a STRUCTURAL ENGINEER who validate the theory that the charges of THERMITE were placed at exactly the proper places to perform a structural demolition - from the top down. Its all on the CAFR1 site

Again: http://www.CAFR1.com/911engineersspeakout
Just to point out here Mr. Pee, for you to state t... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Dec 19, 2015 13:57:50   #
payne1000
 
padremike wrote:
Sorry to inform you of this unfortunate observation but you consistently run around in circles with a bulls eye painted front and back screaming, "shoot me, shoot me, shoot me." No sniper skills required for this turkey shoot.


Obviously false statements refute themselves.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 14:10:55   #
VladimirPee
 
You posed this question once before a few weeks ago. Not only did I post photo's of partial slabs I also explains how concrete turns to dust when dropped and crushed. You don't care about truth you are just a troll


payne1000 wrote:
If the towers collapsed, where were the 110 floors of concrete in the debris on the ground? 110 floors of 4" thick concrete would have covered all the other debris. How do you explain the concrete floors being pulverized to dust? Where are all the trusses which held up the concrete?

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 14:13:44   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
payne1000 wrote:
Obviously false statements refute themselves.


You do realize that you have accurately described yourself? Of course you don't! Payne, you need a hobby to keep your hateful mind otherwise occupied. At least go fishing. Remember, life is too short to fish with a dead cricket.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 14:31:01   #
payne1000
 
VladimirPee wrote:
You posed this question once before a few weeks ago. Not only did I post photo's of partial slabs I also explains how concrete turns to dust when dropped and crushed. You don't care about truth you are just a troll


Were the photos you claimed to have posted showing WTC concrete as valid as the photo of the burning 9-story building you attempted to pass off as the North Tower?
Yes, I'm a troll. I'm a pro bono troll for truth.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 15 of 99 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.