Hillary lost it to the (Page 2): ...so, six hearings have been conducted and that's your best answer, wow.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Liberty Tree wrote:

Of course not since the Dems control the Justice Department and Obama has to protect her to protect himself.

...so, six hearings have been conducted and that's your best answer, wow.

Tradition Loc: Staten Island, N.Y.

Dummy Boy wrote:

...so, six hearings have been conducted and that's your best answer, wow.

Hillary CANNOT DENY those apathetic words she uttered with regard to the Benghazi debacle - where military support could have been provided, BUT WAS NOT, to four courageous Americans who were brutally murdered. "What difference at this point does it make?" WHAT DIFFERENCE?? Ask the families of the four victims. I'm sure they'd give you an answer!!

Hillary, and her cohort, Obama, certainly did not lack for words to defend the "sensitivities" of the Muslim perpetrators. There was a video and a "spontaneous" protest that were declared as catalysts for the TERRORISM - but it was PROVEN, in lieu of the sophisticated weapons used, that this was no spontaneous protest. COULDN'T DENY THAT!!! In 2011 Clinton received about 795 emails, including daily, sometimes even hourly, updates from her staff about Benghazi and Ambassador Chris Stevens. There were only 67 emails that Clinton sent or received about Libya from early 2012 until the deadly September attack. During that time the Ambassador had PLEADED with Clinton's State Department for increased security out of fear of an attack, but Stevens' request was IGNORED and the State Department ACTUALLY REDUCED SECURITY. Imagine!!! She ignores a "close friend" and actually places him in MORE danger. What a pal!!!

BTW - subsequent to the attack, how many words of condemnation for the barbarism did we hear? (CRICKETS?) - Here's what we HEARD: "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation."

What about using ONE PERSONAL SERVER, located in her home, which received not only NATIONAL SECURITY, but TOP SECRET, emails vulnerable to hacking and our brave men and women in combat vulnerable to even more danger than they must. SHE CANNOT DENY THIS because she admitted to it. After all, we can't expect Hillary to carry six pounds worth of two phones. It would be oh so inconvenient! Poor Baby!! Of course, our soldiers carry anywhere from 60 lbs to 100 lbs. on their backs - but what difference does it make!! Right?

Yet, you seem to congratulate yourself on Hillary's escape from consequence. Great judgment, Dummy Boy!! She is absolutely no example of what a proud American, let alone a decent person, should be. She is, instead, the embodiment of hypocrisy, deceit, narcissism, arrogance and selfishness. There is no way that she could possibly be is the best, most ethical president available to the American people - whatever political party she claims. She's had to RE-INVENT herself several times during her campaign - but that false smile and cackle (which is supposed to be a laugh,) just won't let her.

samtheyank

reconreb wrote:

And its a long way to the general election . The lies and crimminal acts will catch the bitch eventualy..

AMEN! I hope you are right! I can not wait until they put her behind bars and make her wear an orange pants suit!

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Tradition wrote:

Hillary CANNOT DENY those apathetic words she uttered with regard to the Benghazi debacle - where military support could have been provided, BUT WAS NOT, to four courageous Americans who were brutally murdered. "What difference at this point does it make?" WHAT DIFFERENCE?? Ask the families of the four victims. I'm sure they'd give you an answer!!

Hillary, and her cohort, Obama, certainly did not lack for words to defend the "sensitivities" of the Muslim perpetrators. There was a video and a "spontaneous" protest that were declared as catalysts for the TERRORISM - but it was PROVEN, in lieu of the sophisticated weapons used, that this was no spontaneous protest. COULDN'T DENY THAT!!! In 2011 Clinton received about 795 emails, including daily, sometimes even hourly, updates from her staff about Benghazi and Ambassador Chris Stevens. There were only 67 emails that Clinton sent or received about Libya from early 2012 until the deadly September attack. During that time the Ambassador had PLEADED with Clinton's State Department for increased security out of fear of an attack, but Stevens' request was IGNORED and the State Department ACTUALLY REDUCED SECURITY. Imagine!!! She ignores a "close friend" and actually places him in MORE danger. What a pal!!!

BTW - subsequent to the attack, how many words of condemnation for the barbarism did we hear? (CRICKETS?) - Here's what we HEARD: "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation."

What about using ONE PERSONAL SERVER, located in her home, which received not only NATIONAL SECURITY, but TOP SECRET, emails vulnerable to hacking and our brave men and women in combat vulnerable to even more danger than they must. SHE CANNOT DENY THIS because she admitted to it. After all, we can't expect Hillary to carry six pounds worth of two phones. It would be oh so inconvenient! Poor Baby!! Of course, our soldiers carry anywhere from 60 lbs to 100 lbs. on their backs - but what difference does it make!! Right?

Yet, you seem to congratulate yourself on Hillary's escape from consequence. Great judgment, Dummy Boy!! She is absolutely no example of what a proud American, let alone a decent person, should be. She is, instead, the embodiment of hypocrisy, deceit, narcissism, arrogance and selfishness. There is no way that she could possibly be is the best, most ethical president available to the American people - whatever political party she claims. She's had to RE-INVENT herself several times during her campaign - but that false smile and cackle (which is supposed to be a laugh,) just won't let her.

Hillary CANNOT DENY those apathetic words she utte... (show quote)

I don't like her either...

...the problem is, you fail to understand that our clowns (i.e. our representatives) an issue to a hearing and accomplishes one thing, the GOP is full idiots.

Sh_t, she reinvents herself for every audience, if you're a liar and you tell people what they wanna hear you're golden. It's all politics.

I'm tired of hearing about this..you're not going to convince any Democrats to sway the other way, if she keeps walking away because she pleads; national security or "the fifth". This is done, move on. Look intelligent for once in your life. Instead of pissing up a rope.

Mission Accomplished...they should'a locked him up to....bunch'a f__king liars

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

samtheyank wrote:

AMEN! I hope you are right! I can not wait until they put her behind bars and make her wear an orange pants suit!

Hahahahahahaha.....hahahahahaha,.....hahaha

RETW Loc: Washington

Tradition wrote:

Hillary CANNOT DENY those apathetic words she uttered with regard to the Benghazi debacle - where military support could have been provided, BUT WAS NOT, to four courageous Americans who were brutally murdered. "What difference at this point does it make?" WHAT DIFFERENCE?? Ask the families of the four victims. I'm sure they'd give you an answer!!

Hillary, and her cohort, Obama, certainly did not lack for words to defend the "sensitivities" of the Muslim perpetrators. There was a video and a "spontaneous" protest that were declared as catalysts for the TERRORISM - but it was PROVEN, in lieu of the sophisticated weapons used, that this was no spontaneous protest. COULDN'T DENY THAT!!! In 2011 Clinton received about 795 emails, including daily, sometimes even hourly, updates from her staff about Benghazi and Ambassador Chris Stevens. There were only 67 emails that Clinton sent or received about Libya from early 2012 until the deadly September attack. During that time the Ambassador had PLEADED with Clinton's State Department for increased security out of fear of an attack, but Stevens' request was IGNORED and the State Department ACTUALLY REDUCED SECURITY. Imagine!!! She ignores a "close friend" and actually places him in MORE danger. What a pal!!!

BTW - subsequent to the attack, how many words of condemnation for the barbarism did we hear? (CRICKETS?) - Here's what we HEARD: "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation."

What about using ONE PERSONAL SERVER, located in her home, which received not only NATIONAL SECURITY, but TOP SECRET, emails vulnerable to hacking and our brave men and women in combat vulnerable to even more danger than they must. SHE CANNOT DENY THIS because she admitted to it. After all, we can't expect Hillary to carry six pounds worth of two phones. It would be oh so inconvenient! Poor Baby!! Of course, our soldiers carry anywhere from 60 lbs to 100 lbs. on their backs - but what difference does it make!! Right?

Yet, you seem to congratulate yourself on Hillary's escape from consequence. Great judgment, Dummy Boy!! She is absolutely no example of what a proud American, let alone a decent person, should be. She is, instead, the embodiment of hypocrisy, deceit, narcissism, arrogance and selfishness. There is no way that she could possibly be is the best, most ethical president available to the American people - whatever political party she claims. She's had to RE-INVENT herself several times during her campaign - but that false smile and cackle (which is supposed to be a laugh,) just won't let her.

Hillary CANNOT DENY those apathetic words she utte... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Tradition Loc: Staten Island, N.Y.

Dummy Boy wrote:

I don't like her either... br br ...the problem i... (show quote)

Oh Dummy - I don't expect to sway Democrats. They voted twice for the guy in the White House - how bright could they be? I brought up those reminders of Hillary's disreputable and dishonorable actions so noone forgets what an unconscionable, perverted piece of work she really is and how her deceit and callousness is validation that she cares nothing for our country or the men and women who lost life and limb to defend it.

People who believe that it is "golden" to lie to American citizens are those who are deluded and duped. They look for their free phones and wind up losing their jobs. They look for a peaceful homeland and wind up in fear of terrorism. They look for a globally respected country and observe foreign leaders who mock us. They look for the strongest, most awesome Dept. of Defense in the world to find an Administration more concerned with the weather than weapons.

For crying out loud, one of the San Bernardino terrorists, Tashfeen Malik, here in the U.S. on a fiancée visa, was found to have passed not just one, BUT THREE, background checks before being admitted. And none of these checks uncovered posts Malik made publicly, on FACEBOOK, proclaiming her support for ISIS and other forms of violent jihad.

But as frightening as that is, what may be worse is the reason for the Obama administrations Department of Homeland Securitys policy PROHIBITING checking social media accounts as part of vetting for foreigners applying for U.S. visas. According to a new report by ABC News, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson chose not to end this SECRET U.S. policy prohibiting review of foreigners' social media accounts, because he feared wait for it a CIVIL LIBERTIES BACKLASH AND BAD PUBLIC RELATIONS.

John Cohen, a former acting undersecretary at the Department of Homeland Security for intelligence and analysis, told ABC News: "The primary concern was that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly and there were concerns that it would be embarrassing. - Anyone want to guess whom they were concerned about offending?

For crying out loud, Americans get vetted via Facebook for minimum wage jobs, but we don't vet for foreigners from the mid-east? And you call the GOP idiots? Sure, its fine for the NSA to be monitoring Americans, but we gotta be extra careful not to violate the privacy,civil rights, and sensitivities of the terrorists. Obama/Clintons America, folks!

Damn It! WHOSE COUNTRY IS THIS?!!! Guess it goes with the territory. That social media policy makes as much sense as peeing up a rope - but then, you would know a lot more about that than I ever could.

Tradition Loc: Staten Island, N.Y.

Tradition wrote:

Oh Dummy - I don't expect to sway Democrats. They voted twice for the guy in the White House - how bright could they be? I brought up those reminders of Hillary's disreputable and dishonorable actions so noone forgets what an unconscionable, perverted piece of work she really is and how her deceit and callousness is validation that she cares nothing for our country or the men and women who lost life and limb to defend it.

People who believe that it is "golden" to lie to American citizens are those who are deluded and duped. They look for their free phones and wind up losing their jobs. They look for a peaceful homeland and wind up in fear of terrorism. They look for a globally respected country and observe foreign leaders who mock us. They look for the strongest, most awesome Dept. of Defense in the world to find an Administration more concerned with the weather than weapons.

For crying out loud, one of the San Bernardino terrorists, Tashfeen Malik, here in the U.S. on a fiancée visa, was found to have passed not just one, BUT THREE, background checks before being admitted. And none of these checks uncovered posts Malik made publicly, on FACEBOOK, proclaiming her support for ISIS and other forms of violent jihad.

But as frightening as that is, what may be worse is the reason for the Obama administrations Department of Homeland Securitys policy PROHIBITING checking social media accounts as part of vetting for foreigners applying for U.S. visas. According to a new report by ABC News, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson chose not to end this SECRET U.S. policy prohibiting review of foreigners' social media accounts, because he feared wait for it a CIVIL LIBERTIES BACKLASH AND BAD PUBLIC RELATIONS.

John Cohen, a former acting undersecretary at the Department of Homeland Security for intelligence and analysis, told ABC News: "The primary concern was that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly and there were concerns that it would be embarrassing. - Anyone want to guess whom they were concerned about offending?

For crying out loud, Americans get vetted via Facebook for minimum wage jobs, but we don't vet for foreigners from the mid-east? And you call the GOP idiots? Sure, its fine for the NSA to be monitoring Americans, but we gotta be extra careful not to violate the privacy,civil rights, and sensitivities of the terrorists. Obama/Clintons America, folks!

Damn It! WHOSE COUNTRY IS THIS?!!! Guess it goes with the territory. That social media policy makes as much sense as peeing up a rope - but then, you would know a lot more about that than I ever could, Dummy.

Oh Dummy - I don't expect to sway Democrats. They... (show quote)

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Tradition wrote:

Oh Dummy - I don't expect to sway Democrats. They voted twice for the guy in the White House - how bright could they be? I brought up those reminders of Hillary's disreputable and dishonorable actions so noone forgets what an unconscionable, perverted piece of work she really is and how her deceit and callousness is validation that she cares nothing for our country or the men and women who lost life and limb to defend it.

People who believe that it is "golden" to lie to American citizens are those who are deluded and duped. They look for their free phones and wind up losing their jobs. They look for a peaceful homeland and wind up in fear of terrorism. They look for a globally respected country and observe foreign leaders who mock us. They look for the strongest, most awesome Dept. of Defense in the world to find an Administration more concerned with the weather than weapons.

For crying out loud, one of the San Bernardino terrorists, Tashfeen Malik, here in the U.S. on a fiancée visa, was found to have passed not just one, BUT THREE, background checks before being admitted. And none of these checks uncovered posts Malik made publicly, on FACEBOOK, proclaiming her support for ISIS and other forms of violent jihad.

But as frightening as that is, what may be worse is the reason for the Obama administrations Department of Homeland Securitys policy PROHIBITING checking social media accounts as part of vetting for foreigners applying for U.S. visas. According to a new report by ABC News, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson chose not to end this SECRET U.S. policy prohibiting review of foreigners' social media accounts, because he feared wait for it a CIVIL LIBERTIES BACKLASH AND BAD PUBLIC RELATIONS.

John Cohen, a former acting undersecretary at the Department of Homeland Security for intelligence and analysis, told ABC News: "The primary concern was that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly and there were concerns that it would be embarrassing. - Anyone want to guess whom they were concerned about offending?

For crying out loud, Americans get vetted via Facebook for minimum wage jobs, but we don't vet for foreigners from the mid-east? And you call the GOP idiots? Sure, its fine for the NSA to be monitoring Americans, but we gotta be extra careful not to violate the privacy,civil rights, and sensitivities of the terrorists. Obama/Clintons America, folks!

Damn It! WHOSE COUNTRY IS THIS?!!! Guess it goes with the territory. That social media policy makes as much sense as peeing up a rope - but then, you would know a lot more about that than I ever could.

Oh Dummy - I don't expect to sway Democrats. They... (show quote)

...so you're reminding people that haven't forgotten because...why...I know she's liar, you know she's a liar...to put it her way, unless someone has documentation that explains what she did wrong, such as: she deliberately put people in danger, they got nothing, move on to something else. Her minions don't care what you think. She would love to see Trump win the nomination...because anyone that's an on the fence independent would fall for her....she's Satan incarnate....a lot of energy is being wasted to accomplish nothing. They should have waited until she wins the nomination. At least it would have sullied her name when it makes snese.

RETW Loc: Washington

Tradition wrote:

Oh Dummy - I don't expect to sway Democrats. They voted twice for the guy in the White House - how bright could they be? I brought up those reminders of Hillary's disreputable and dishonorable actions so noone forgets what an unconscionable, perverted piece of work she really is and how her deceit and callousness is validation that she cares nothing for our country or the men and women who lost life and limb to defend it.

People who believe that it is "golden" to lie to American citizens are those who are deluded and duped. They look for their free phones and wind up losing their jobs. They look for a peaceful homeland and wind up in fear of terrorism. They look for a globally respected country and observe foreign leaders who mock us. They look for the strongest, most awesome Dept. of Defense in the world to find an Administration more concerned with the weather than weapons.

For crying out loud, one of the San Bernardino terrorists, Tashfeen Malik, here in the U.S. on a fiancée visa, was found to have passed not just one, BUT THREE, background checks before being admitted. And none of these checks uncovered posts Malik made publicly, on FACEBOOK, proclaiming her support for ISIS and other forms of violent jihad.

But as frightening as that is, what may be worse is the reason for the Obama administrations Department of Homeland Securitys policy PROHIBITING checking social media accounts as part of vetting for foreigners applying for U.S. visas. According to a new report by ABC News, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson chose not to end this SECRET U.S. policy prohibiting review of foreigners' social media accounts, because he feared wait for it a CIVIL LIBERTIES BACKLASH AND BAD PUBLIC RELATIONS.

John Cohen, a former acting undersecretary at the Department of Homeland Security for intelligence and analysis, told ABC News: "The primary concern was that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly and there were concerns that it would be embarrassing. - Anyone want to guess whom they were concerned about offending?

For crying out loud, Americans get vetted via Facebook for minimum wage jobs, but we don't vet for foreigners from the mid-east? And you call the GOP idiots? Sure, its fine for the NSA to be monitoring Americans, but we gotta be extra careful not to violate the privacy,civil rights, and sensitivities of the terrorists. Obama/Clintons America, folks!

Damn It! WHOSE COUNTRY IS THIS?!!! Guess it goes with the territory. That social media policy makes as much sense as peeing up a rope - but then, you would know a lot more about that than I ever could.

Oh Dummy - I don't expect to sway Democrats. They... (show quote)

Say Tradition:

I call that pissing up a tree, and sliding down the wet side..

Your right on the money.

RETW

8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

Tradition Loc: Staten Island, N.Y.

RETW wrote:

Say Tradition:

I call that pissing up a tree, and sliding down the wet side..

Your right on the money.

RETW

8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

Thanks so much for the support RETW. You're very kind.

samtheyank

Dummy Boy wrote:

I don't like her either... br br ...the problem i... (show quote)

The disease of lying is in both Parties. It is contagious.

RETW Loc: Washington

samtheyank wrote:

The disease of lying is in both Parties. It is contagious.

Ant that the truth

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

RETW Loc: Washington

Tradition wrote:

Thanks so much for the support RETW. You're very kind.

Being kind has nothing to do with it. As I said you are spot on. Good judgment.

RETW 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-)

mark13 Loc: usa

Stopping government by whim, means compelling the prosecution of all of the principle government employees present and past immediate arrest and civil forfeiture - no bail - no mercy - no time served - 1, court appointed, overworked public defender - in summery process applying a directed prosecution, a directed defense, a chain jury delivering a directed verdict, EXACTLY like they do to us using their phony show charges, forfeitures, claims, trials, processes.

The existence of the American Constitution as the law of the land specifically secures private prosecutions of criminal and civil charges [subject only to Constitutionally mandated due process provisions : Federal and State, County/local] which is distinct from there being no provision for any government employee resembling : being a so-called attorney general : federal prosecutor.

What this means is that every government employee is subject to civil suite and criminal prosecution as soon as legal processes are engaged... because of the constitutional stipulations about who is free from process : arrest AND Precisely When, the remainder = virtually every government employee, is immediately subject.

If it were me, I would Round up like-minded buds, lay the criminal and civil prosecution plans out, make a presentment for crowd funding, ask for commercial attorneys who are interested, and go for it the list of criminal activities by the current and past elective, appointive, and administrator government employees are Legion; so, front load and reserve the option to add emerging charges - defendants - processes as time passes in running prosecutions rather than multiple consecutive or concurrent processes as everything unfolds there used to be a clause in the RICO statutes that provided for representing attorneys to be rolled in on such crime family activities check it out and use it.

These C/Prosecutorial elements apply to every/all elected appointed Executive, Legislative, Judicial, Administrator appointed or administrator employees.