One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy"
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 13, 2015 12:56:38   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy"
Sylvia Thompson

To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.

The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.

I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.

Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.

This is my take.

Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.

Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.

Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.

He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.

Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.

Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.

Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.

It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.

These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."

The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.

Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.

Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.
Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.

Ms. Thompson is a copy editor by trade currently residing in Tennessee. She formerly wrote for the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley California Newsletter and the online conservative blog ChronWatch, also out of California.

She grew up in Southeast Texas during the waning years of Jim Crow-era legalized segregation, and she concludes that race relations in America will never improve, nor will we ever elevate our culture, as long as there are victims to be pandered to and villains to be vilified. America is better served without victims or villains.

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 13:20:59   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
Here is what I think! If Trump wins the election and I believe that Vegas would take odds's he does. Those that choose to use the system on the backs of those who work hard is going to come to an abrupt end. There are those that need help and because of you low life blood sucking leaches don't get it. Your no more than lazy baby's. Whining self indulgent amoeba's. I will attempt to help anyone But you must also help yourself. Because if you don't you can just starve to death and it will not feel any guilt. Sad the children you bare have no choice but to tolerate YOUR UTTER WORTHLESSNESS. They are the helpless victims.
eagleye13 wrote:
Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy"
Sylvia Thompson

To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.

The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.

I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.

Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.

This is my take.

Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.

Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.

Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.

He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.

Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.

Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.

Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.

It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.

These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."

The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.

Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.

Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.
Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.

Ms. Thompson is a copy editor by trade currently residing in Tennessee. She formerly wrote for the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley California Newsletter and the online conservative blog ChronWatch, also out of California.

She grew up in Southeast Texas during the waning years of Jim Crow-era legalized segregation, and she concludes that race relations in America will never improve, nor will we ever elevate our culture, as long as there are victims to be pandered to and villains to be vilified. America is better served without victims or villains.
Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy" br ... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 13:36:09   #
thinksense
 
Of course O. doesn't really do anything except act as the front man, and target for all the critisism and other bad stuff.

I'm amazed at the lack of understanding of the average "Amercun". They actually think they have a say in who is put in place as front man. They talk about who they voted for, and the fact that they have hardly ever met anyone who admits to voting for "O". Don't they know that the pres is not elected by "popular vote", but rather by the electoral college members, who can put anyone up that they are told to?

Now the fools talk of Trumpy baby who is going to "change things". If he really was, do you think the powers that control the media would ever even allow his name to be mentioned?

92.2% of a given population of humans are incapable of thinking an original thought. It is good that their votes really don't matter.

Reply
 
 
Dec 13, 2015 13:38:39   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
No one knows for sure what all will be included in his legacy but I think I've found a picture that would describe whats expected.

eagleye13 wrote:
Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy"
Sylvia Thompson

To the many gullible souls out there who truly think that Barack Obama is "legacy building" in his all-out assault on America, I implore you to bow out of the conversation because you are not seeing clearly.

The term legacy carries positive connotations of something bequeath that is to the receiver's benefit. Everything that Barack Obama does is calculated to destroy America, which he despises. This man no more cares about legacy than he fears being properly prosecuted by the white political leaders whose responsibility it is to remove him from office.

I focus on white leaders, because whites are still in the majority and they fill the majority of political offices. If the majority of political operatives were of some other ethnicity, I would lodge my complaint against that group. Ethnicity is an issue only because Obama is half-black and he uses that fact to intimidate guilt-conflicted white people. Otherwise, he would have been impeached and likely in prison for treason by now.

Barack Obama's sole aim has been, since he first entered politics and continues as he winds down this presidency, the complete destruction of America as it was founded.

It is an insult to the intelligence of all Americans who must listen to elitist pundits on Fox news and elsewhere, and political drones in either party endeavor to make Obama's behavior fit a pattern of normalcy. Attributing his destructive policies to "legacy building" is either self-delusion on the part of the people who make that claim or cowardliness.

This is my take.

Obama's nuclear deal with Iran has nothing to do with legacy but rather to enable a Muslim nation to wage nuclear war with America and Israel – the two nations that he most despises. Does anyone wonder why Russians praise Vladimir Putin despite what the rest of the world might think of him? Putin cares about his country, that's why.

Obama despises the American military because traditionally it has been a mainstay of America's strength, and our strength infuriates him.

Imposition of a polluting homosexual, anti-Christian agenda upon the military ranks destroys unit cohesion and literally terrorizes male members with the prospect of sodomy rape. Such rapes have increased since the forcing of open homosexuality in the ranks, against the will of a majority of members I might add. Couple that with an infiltration of women, for whom all standards of strength must be reduced, and Obama attains his goal of emasculating and demoralizing the forces.

He could not care less about a legacy of making the forces more diverse. Besides, President Truman diversified the military as much as it should be when he integrated it. Obama's objective is its destruction.

Obama reopened relations with Cuba because Cuba is Communist. Legacy is not his concern here either, but rather to scuttle America's attempts to keep Communist influence out of the Americas. That Cuba has major issues with human rights does not matter. Like his Marxist African father before him, he despises the West and all that it represents.

Obama lawlessly declares open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens, because he wants to overrun America with third-world people who bring little more than dependency with them. This tactic not only does not ensure a legacy, but rather it guarantees the eventual conversion of America itself into third-world status, if it is allowed to continue.

Bill Clinton started the travesty of increasing the numbers of third-world immigrants at the expense of culturally more suited immigrants from European and European-influenced nations, but Obama has taken the trend to lawless, destructive extremes. He is fully aware that many of these invaders have no intention of assimilating.

It is only the outcry of a majority of Americans that holds back this hateful invasion scheme, and Donald Trump's entry onto the political scene to oppose that scheme is a saving grace for our nation.

These are but a few instances of behavior that display the loathsome character of Barack Hussein Obama. And he is allowed to roam freely through the American landscape poisoning and polluting as he goes, sure in the realization that no one will stop him because he is "black."

The day that we no longer have to hear the prattle about his "legacy building" will not be soon enough for me.

Many, many Americans are thoroughly fed up with Barack Obama and the spineless crop of political leaders who ignore his criminality. It is yet unknown whether Republicans will ever garner the backbone to become a true opposition party and hold him accountable. Promising signs are the House conservatives' getting rid of establishment types John Boehner and Kevin McCarthy as House Speaker and Speaker hopeful, respectively, and Donald Trump's entry into the 2016 presidential race with enough money and testicular fortitude to tell the Establishment and the Left where to shove it.

Should these positive trends not continue and the 2016 election cycle yield no movement to counter all the harm that Barack Obama has done to this nation, I think there will be massive disruption. Those folks in the National Rifle Association ads currently running on television seem very serious to me, and that is a good thing.
Sylvia Thompson is a black conservative writer whose aim is to counter the liberal spin on issues pertaining to race and culture.

Ms. Thompson is a copy editor by trade currently residing in Tennessee. She formerly wrote for the Conservative Forum of Silicon Valley California Newsletter and the online conservative blog ChronWatch, also out of California.

She grew up in Southeast Texas during the waning years of Jim Crow-era legalized segregation, and she concludes that race relations in America will never improve, nor will we ever elevate our culture, as long as there are victims to be pandered to and villains to be vilified. America is better served without victims or villains.
Barack Obama is not seeking "legacy" br ... (show quote)

Others have left piles but nothing like what big O'S amounts to.
Others have left piles but nothing like what big O...

Reply
Dec 13, 2015 13:52:56   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
Buddy if he wanted he could buy the Media. At the very least if he intended he could destroy them. The thing that should amaze you is your self induced stupidity
thinksense wrote:
Of course O. doesn't really do anything except act as the front man, and target for all the critisism and other bad stuff.

I'm amazed at the lack of understanding of the average "Amercun". They actually think they have a say in who is put in place as front man. They talk about who they voted for, and the fact that they have hardly ever met anyone who admits to voting for "O". Don't they know that the pres is not elected by "popular vote", but rather by the electoral college members, who can put anyone up that they are told to?

Now the fools talk of Trumpy baby who is going to "change things". If he really was, do you think the powers that control the media would ever even allow his name to be mentioned?

92.2% of a given population of humans are incapable of thinking an original thought. It is good that their votes really don't matter.
Of course O. doesn't really do anything except act... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 14, 2015 14:16:03   #
thinksense
 
Jim...Thank you for your polite, errudite and cogent comment. I listened very closely. ;-)

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 11:01:27   #
Terry Hamblin
 
Time is like a river. You cannot touch the water twice, because the flow that has passed will never pass again.

Franklin Graham was speaking at the First Baptist Church in Jacksonville, Florida in January, 2015, when he said America will not come back. He wrote:

The American dream ended on November 6th, 2012 in Ohio. The second term of Barack Obama has been the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed the greatest republic in the history of mankind. A coalition of blacks, Latinos, feminists, gays, government workers, union members, environmental extremists, the media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the "forever needy," the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other "fellow travelers" have ended Norman Rockwell's America.

You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take zealots, not moderates and shy, not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status. People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will probably never again be able to legally comment on or
concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired.

The cocker spaniel is off the front porch, the pit bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" and the likes of Chicago shyster David Axelrod along with international socialist George Soros have been pulling the strings on their beige puppet have brought us Act 2 of the New World Order. The curtain will come down but the damage has been done, the story has been told.

Those who come after us will once again have to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to white guilt and political correctness..

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 11:05:36   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
I would ask one question I want someone to give me a reasonable explanation of why I should feel the slightest bit of guilt about being white.
Terry Hamblin wrote:
Time is like a river. You cannot touch the water twice, because the flow that has passed will never pass again.

Franklin Graham was speaking at the First Baptist Church in Jacksonville, Florida in January, 2015, when he said America will not come back. He wrote:

The American dream ended on November 6th, 2012 in Ohio. The second term of Barack Obama has been the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed the greatest republic in the history of mankind. A coalition of blacks, Latinos, feminists, gays, government workers, union members, environmental extremists, the media, Hollywood, uninformed young people, the "forever needy," the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other "fellow travelers" have ended Norman Rockwell's America.

You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take zealots, not moderates and shy, not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status. People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will probably never again be able to legally comment on or
concern myself with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired.

The cocker spaniel is off the front porch, the pit bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" and the likes of Chicago shyster David Axelrod along with international socialist George Soros have been pulling the strings on their beige puppet have brought us Act 2 of the New World Order. The curtain will come down but the damage has been done, the story has been told.

Those who come after us will once again have to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to white guilt and political correctness..
Time is like a river. You cannot touch the water t... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 11:08:49   #
Terry Hamblin
 
jimahrens wrote:
I would ask one question I want someone to give me a reasonable explanation of why I should feel the slightest bit of guilt about being white.


Exactly Jim!

Reply
Dec 16, 2015 11:17:32   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
jimahrens wrote:
I would ask one question I want someone to give me a reasonable explanation of why I should feel the slightest bit of guilt about being white.


I am not sure. Maybe we need to reed a new textbook,that our kids have to read.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 11:25:35   #
Terry Hamblin
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I am not sure. Maybe we need to reed a new textbook,that our kids have to read.


Good point eagleye13, looks like the kids are being taught now that they should be ashamed that they are white. It's as if someone gave the white race something, no work involved, and even though we share, both willingly and by governmental edicts, it is not enough.

The wise man said that you can give the poor food and he ends up with nothing, but if you teach him how to fish, his belly will always be full!

Now give money, food, free housing, and other assorted riches to someone, you will also see that he will always be poor, not simply entitled but demanding.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 11:50:28   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
The problem is this has happened by plan. Not stupidity of the planners. It is self serving, and wicked at its core. Works well for the globalist elitists; until the cattle wake up, and they pay the piper.


Terry Hamblin wrote:
Good point eagleye13, looks like the kids are being taught now that they should be ashamed that they are white. It's as if someone gave the white race something, no work involved, and even though we share, both willingly and by governmental edicts, it is not enough.

The wise man said that you can give the poor food and he ends up with nothing, but if you teach him how to fish, his belly will always be full!

Now give money, food, free housing, and other assorted riches to someone, you will also see that he will always be poor, not simply entitled but demanding.
Good point eagleye13, looks like the kids are bein... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 12:33:42   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
I think it is way past time for us to form a new party and throw out the old. We voted these fool in we sure can start a new party with rules of eutectic for those who seek office. Time has long passed for politicians to be responsible for there actions. And first rule no Lobbyist allowed.
eagleye13 wrote:
The problem is this has happened by plan. Not stupidity of the planners. It is self serving, and wicked at its core. Works well for the globalist elitists; until the cattle wake up, and they pay the piper.

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 12:56:53   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
I have voted third party since the 70's, as a protest vote against the Elitists front men "selected "for the tickets.
It is impossible for a 3'rd party to win now, and the PTB know it.
They have the MSM, the networks telling people how to think.
They have the $billions it takes to flood the airwaves (While filling their own pockets with add revenue)
The have Joe Q Sixpack, dumbed down, and ignoring it all.
AND; as a last resort they give BS polls and rigged voting machines.

So if we get another scam election; I will vote for a non-DR candidate.


BTW; I registered Republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primary.
Anyone care to know what the RNC and MSM did to Ron Paul?
Who cares if America gets an honest election?
If you do; better try and fight for an honest one.

A compilation of footage that shows the tactics used by the MSM to block Ron Paul’s candidacy. Everything from; ignoring, bias, and lies.
Even Republican caucus fraud at minute 22.
http://youtu.be/o_WBo4sfmi4

Don't believe voting machines were rigged against Ron Paul? Study this for awhile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhCw7dbDKZ0






jimahrens wrote:
I think it is way past time for us to form a new party and throw out the old. We voted these fool in we sure can start a new party with rules of eutectic for those who seek office. Time has long passed for politicians to be responsible for there actions. And first rule no Lobbyist allowed.

Reply
Dec 25, 2015 10:58:55   #
Terry Hamblin
 
eagleye13 wrote:
I have voted third party since the 70's, as a protest vote against the Elitists front men "selected "for the tickets.
It is impossible for a 3'rd party to win now, and the PTB know it.
They have the MSM, the networks telling people how to think.
They have the $billions it takes to flood the airwaves (While filling their own pockets with add revenue)
The have Joe Q Sixpack, dumbed down, and ignoring it all.
AND; as a last resort they give BS polls and rigged voting machines.

So if we get another scam election; I will vote for a non-DR candidate.

BTW; I registered Republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primary.
Anyone care to know what the RNC and MSM did to Ron Paul?
Who cares if America gets an honest election?
If you do; better try and fight for an honest one.

A compilation of footage that shows the tactics used by the MSM to block Ron Paul’s candidacy. Everything from; ignoring, bias, and lies.
Even Republican caucus fraud at minute 22.
http://youtu.be/o_WBo4sfmi4

Don't believe voting machines were rigged against Ron Paul? Study this for awhile.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhCw7dbDKZ0
I have voted third party since the 70's, as a prot... (show quote)


I like Bernie but Hillary seems to have already bought and paid for the DNC with her money from Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs BTW, got Greece and maybe other Med. countries into the EEC by issuing junk bonds backed by Greece, then, knowing that Greece could never pay for those bonds, insured their outlay with AIG! You know the rest of the story....

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: Biden v Trump Debate Topics?
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.