CrazyHorse wrote:
Quid Pro Quo, oldroy: The title concerned me so I read it. I understand the pretended presentation directed at Hillary, but d--- I have to say I still don't like the impression that is given from the title. What about the folks that just read the title and go on to something else with a negative impression of Sarah Palin. How is that fair to Sarah Palin. I sure would not like it if I was used in a similar fashion as an example for someone else's devious lying work product causing 4 deaths.
Did you notice the number of people who wrote after only reading the title? Of course, I knew the leaners would go wild at that title but of course the article was written in sarcasm and once one had read most of it he found out that.
Hey, man Sarah is one of my favorite politicians and I wanted only too see how many people would write from the title only.