One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Hate speech
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Dec 1, 2015 16:46:34   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
mwdegutis wrote:
Aren't those the "dirty tricks" you spoke of in another thread that are OK to use i.e. the ends justify the means?


.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 16:47:23   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
Loki wrote:
Jihad,, NOT "jahad." At least you're consistent; this is the third time I have noticed your misspelling the word the same way.

.

Reply
Dec 1, 2015 16:48:54   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Kevyn wrote:
Here is the difference, If a person doesn't think abortion should be legal and they say so it is disagreement, the same when they say they think it is immoral or a sin. The line is crossed when they publicly call every politician who supports abortion rights or the people who work for Planned Parenthood murderers and baby killers. Or compare a legal health service to Hitlers genocide. By referring to people as mass murderers when they are not stokes up the mentally unstable people within the movement to committ violent attacks. After all, to the feeble minded what could be better than killing a murderer or Hitler? It is no different than extremist clerics preaching Jahad to their flock, it is hate speach pure and simple and the results are all but guaranteed. The BS of the time we are living in is the complete lack of discretion and civility in political discourse.
Here is the difference, If a person doesn't think ... (show quote)


Misposted, oops.

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2015 16:49:53   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
mwdegutis wrote:
.


Mispost, oops.

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 06:38:56   #
crackerjack
 
Kevyn wrote:
Here is the difference, If a person doesn't think abortion should be legal and they say so it is disagreement, the same when they say they think it is immoral or a sin. The line is crossed when they publicly call every politician who supports abortion rights or the people who work for Planned Parenthood murderers and baby killers. Or compare a legal health service to Hitlers genocide. By referring to people as mass murderers when they are not stokes up the mentally unstable people within the movement to committ violent attacks. After all, to the feeble minded what could be better than killing a murderer or Hitler? It is no different than extremist clerics preaching Jahad to their flock, it is hate speach pure and simple and the results are all but guaranteed. The BS of the time we are living in is the complete lack of discretion and civility in political discourse.
Here is the difference, If a person doesn't think ... (show quote)


Yeah, it's great to have you around with your calming words. You're a real peacemaker. The whole world should be full of you.

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 06:43:41   #
rebob14
 
Glaucon wrote:
Why Hate Speech by Presidential Candidates Is Despicable

I'm not suggesting Trump, Carson, Fiorina, or any other presidential candidate is directly to blame for hate crimes erupting across America. But by virtue of their standing as presidential candidates, their words carry particular weight. They have a responsibility to calm people with the truth rather than stir them up with lies.


Specifically??

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 07:18:50   #
PeterS
 
Glaucon wrote:
Why Hate Speech by Presidential Candidates Is Despicable

I'm not suggesting Trump, Carson, Fiorina, or any other presidential candidate is directly to blame for hate crimes erupting across America. But by virtue of their standing as presidential candidates, their words carry particular weight. They have a responsibility to calm people with the truth rather than stir them up with lies.

This latest RW nut to go all Rambo was pretty much off the grid. So while I do think hate speech can incite nuts was that what happened in this case? I mean, it wasn't like he was sitting at home watching TV and oiling his AK-47. I think the question is whether political candidates should be responsible citizens and watch what they say? The answer is a very definite yes, but we seem to have lost it as far being a civil society and in all corners there seems to be a desire to incite the most radical amongst us. When Donald speaks of rampaging Mexicans and Carly of Baby body parts they do so because that's what gets them the loudest cheers and the accolades are what pump things up and keep the train-a-roll-n. It's their own personal 'Zelg heil' moment and when the candidates and their minions are the closest to being one. Nothing unifies faster than hate which is why those with the least to offer rely on it so much. The nuts that flame out along the way only tells those types of candidates that they are on the right track!

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2015 07:25:59   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
Glaucon wrote:
Why Hate Speech by Presidential Candidates Is Despicable

I'm not suggesting Trump, Carson, Fiorina, or any other presidential candidate is directly to blame for hate crimes erupting across America. But by virtue of their standing as presidential candidates, their words carry particular weight. They have a responsibility to calm people with the truth rather than stir them up with lies.









Interesting from one who is in the party of deception and baby murdering to see what price a carefully removed set of baby eyes can fetch. Tell me more, glucose.

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 07:30:13   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
PeterS wrote:
This latest RW nut to go all Rambo was pretty much off the grid. So while I do think hate speech can incite nuts was that what happened in this case? I mean, it wasn't like he was sitting at home watching TV and oiling his AK-47. I think the question is whether political candidates should be responsible citizens and watch what they say? The answer is a very definite yes, but we seem to have lost it as far being a civil society and in all corners there seems to be a desire to incite the most radical amongst us. When Donald speaks of rampaging Mexicans and Carly of Baby body parts they do so because that's what gets them the loudest cheers and the accolades are what pump things up and keep the train-a-roll-n. It's their own personal 'Zelg heil' moment and when the candidates and their minions are the closest to being one. Nothing unifies faster than hate which is why those with the least to offer rely on it so much. The nuts that flame out along the way only tells those types of candidates that they are on the right track!
This latest RW nut to go all Rambo was pretty much... (show quote)








Interesting from one who is in the party of deception who murders innocent infants and then sells their baby eyes and ALL other carefully removed baby body parts for a good profit, peter piper. Who wouldn't believe you??? Hummmmmm.

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 07:59:25   #
PeterS
 
Loki wrote:
The same can be said of the Democrats, but you will never say it.

True, but with this batch not to the same level as the republicans. People aren't coming out of a Bernie rally looking for billionaires to lynch or with Hillary a Wall Street banker to depants. They incite passion but with democrats it's more towards enacting policy they support. Democrats can wait but with republicans, they want action and they want it NOW which you will never get with a dysfunctional congress. Also, factor in 7 years of frustration and it's a whole new level of passion for the conservative side of the coin...

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 08:06:25   #
PeterS
 
cesspool jones wrote:
That's beautiful....but what you seem to forget is for every action (liberal sins all over the place), there is a reaction (conservative cleaning up these sins)

So you kill your fellow conservatives? The cop killed in this case was a conservative and advent pro-lifer--which is a far better representation of the ideology than this putz going all 'cowboy' on anyone and everyone he could kill!

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2015 08:07:50   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
PeterS wrote:
This latest RW nut to go all Rambo was pretty much off the grid. So while I do think hate speech can incite nuts was that what happened in this case? I mean, it wasn't like he was sitting at home watching TV and oiling his AK-47. I think the question is whether political candidates should be responsible citizens and watch what they say? The answer is a very definite yes, but we seem to have lost it as far being a civil society and in all corners there seems to be a desire to incite the most radical amongst us. When Donald speaks of rampaging Mexicans and Carly of Baby body parts they do so because that's what gets them the loudest cheers and the accolades are what pump things up and keep the train-a-roll-n. It's their own personal 'Zelg heil' moment and when the candidates and their minions are the closest to being one. Nothing unifies faster than hate which is why those with the least to offer rely on it so much. The nuts that flame out along the way only tells those types of candidates that they are on the right track!
This latest RW nut to go all Rambo was pretty much... (show quote)


Where do you get the idea that he had an AK47?

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 08:08:15   #
PeterS
 
robmull wrote:
Interesting from one who is in the party of deception who murders innocent infants and then sells their baby eyes and ALL other carefully removed baby body parts for a good profit, peter piper. Who wouldn't believe you??? Hummmmmm.

Did you have to rub both your brain cells together to come up with that reply or did you manage on just one? Hummmmm...

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 08:10:02   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
PeterS wrote:
Did you have to rub both your brain cells together to come up with that reply or did you manage on just one? Hummmmm...


I hate to tell you this, but the nut job was not affiliated with any political party, or ideology. He was not a "Conservative Christian," or any other kind of Conservative, or Christian. I also might point out that over half of the mass shooters in this country in the last 15 years have been Democrats. The guy just up the road in Aurora was an Obama campaign worker. The kids who shot up Columbine with stolen guns came from a Democrat family. The Ft Hood shooter was an Obama supporter, as was Chris Dorner in California. The other mass murderer in California whose name escapes me at the moment, you know, the one who stabbed a couple of people to death before he started shooting? Democrat.

Reply
Dec 2, 2015 08:18:33   #
PeterS
 
Loki wrote:
Where do you get the idea that he had an AK47?
Google:

"Sources said there would have been nothing apparent in Dear's background — including a felony conviction or previous mental health issue — that would have disqualified him from buying an AK-47 style, high-powered rifle used in the shootings."

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/planned-parenthood-shooting-suspect-made-comment-about-no-more-baby-n470706

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.