jelun wrote:
Your method of breaking down threads is really annoying.
What are you going to do when you have to eat your own in order to disrupt things?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
He'll probably get the recipe from you. He won't eat them rare.
I have no doubt about that.
astrolite wrote:
The 29% just say who WILL BE shooting them! And Muslims will be shooting at all 52%, But obama (or whatever his real name is) wants to make our murders easier for his muslim brothers by disarming us! There can be no doubt that he is leader of the muslim radicals (that's all of them) in America!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: We know who the enemy is! He sits in the white mosque in Washington DC and all those who kiss his ass are his army of deranged misfits. More like an army of zombies!
If only they could see this!!! I was under the cloud of deception for half of my life..............this difference in paradigms is a real problem!!!!!
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
He'll probably get the recipe from you. He won't eat them rare.
I have no doubt about that.
None of you are particularly rare.
reconreb wrote:
You mean terrorist do not use guns?? anyway your source is not well known but I'd say their assesment is OK but are you suggesting we give up our guns?? NOT HAPPENING .. rabid shih tzu / tell me if you will, if 8 jihadist can bring Paris to a stop and kill & wound so many is that acceptable ?
If Paris wasn't a "gun-free" zone, reconreb, perhaps the terrorist would have thought much differently about going into a stadium or auditorium with the distinct possibility some armed people would have blown their stinkin' damn heads off after the first shot!!! It seems "gun-free" zones are the very first choice of bad-guys with guns. Daaaa.
jelun wrote:
What is it about the reporting of poll results that frightens you so?
Something really should be done about gang gun violence, perhaps enforcing the law would help.
It is sad that our ghettos are so bad (thanks to democratic leadership) that people are more worried about a stray bullet, than that of a group of radicals, that are being brought in to our own country, by our own government, that have sworn to kill all Americans.
What is wrong w/ the handful of people polled ?
robmull wrote:
If Paris wasn't a "gun-free" zone, reconreb, perhaps the terrorist would have thought much differently about going into a stadium or auditorium with the distinct possibility some armed people would have blown their stinkin' damn heads off after the first shot!!! It seems "gun-free" zones are the very first choice of bad-guys with guns. Daaaa.
It is interesting just how easy it was for them to get fully automatic guns, and bombs, in a country w/ such stict gun laws.
Even more proof that gun control doesn't work, thanks Frenchies:thumbup:
the waker wrote:
Something really should be done about gang gun violence, perhaps enforcing the law would help.
It is sad that our ghettos are so bad (thanks to democratic leadership) that people are more worried about a stray bullet, than that of a group of radicals, that are being brought in to our own country, by our own government, that have sworn to kill all Americans.
What is wrong w/ the handful of people polled ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I suggest that what is wrong is that only progs were polled, and it wasn't about fear or violence. It was an agenda to disarm the American public. Most polls are geared to gain specific answers, and thoughtless people give their thoughtless answers.
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I suggest that what is wrong is that only progs were polled, and it wasn't about fear or violence. It was an agenda to disarm the American public. Most polls are geared to gain specific answers, and thoughtless people give their thoughtless answers.
Indeed, just wanted him/her or whatever, to realize it.
If they polled only people in Democratic cities, then of course they're worried about getting shot by some gangbanger. :shock:
If the 100% would just stop & think : guns do not attack anyone by them selves...most terrorists today use guns & they do attack & kill as we all should know...to fear "gun" violence one has to be stupid...I had my gun out on my table all day & for several days & not once did it do a violent act. So fear fear terrorists but don't fear guns is my motto...
CowboyMilt wrote:
If the 100% would just stop & think : guns do not attack anyone by them selves...most terrorists today use guns & they do attack & kill as we all should know...to fear "gun" violence one has to be stupid...I had my gun out on my table all day & for several days & not once did it do a violent act. So fear fear terrorists but don't fear guns is my motto...
You mean your gun didn't jump up and shoot you either, wow, we must have defective guns :lol:
the waker wrote:
Something really should be done about gang gun violence, perhaps enforcing the law would help.
It is sad that our ghettos are so bad (thanks to democratic leadership) that people are more worried about a stray bullet, than that of a group of radicals, that are being brought in to our own country, by our own government, that have sworn to kill all Americans.
What is wrong w/ the handful of people polled ?
If you bothered to open the link you might understand the results.
U give new meaning to "idiot" . idiot!!!!
jelun wrote:
If you bothered to open the link you might understand the results.
I do understand the results, do you?
All it talks about is gun violence, doesn't specify"how".
Now tell me, what ranks highest in gun related murders in the US?
Now also tell me, has the media not down played foriegn issues, and play heavy on 2nd amendment issues over the last year?
the waker wrote:
I do understand the results, do you?
All it talks about is gun violence, doesn't specify"how".
Now tell me, what ranks highest in gun related murders in the US?
Now also tell me, has the media not down played foriegn issues, and play heavy on 2nd amendment issues over the last year?
For crying out loud, it is talking about perceptions and fears.
Facts are not really the point.
People fear gun violence. Period.
What media are you talking about? We have the internet. People can get whatever news they are interested in. Take some responsibility for your own exposure to issues just like the rest of us.
Al Jazeera is a great source, so is the BBC.
How much coverage do you expect to get in an hour on TV?
Buy a newspaper you will be exposed to world news.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.