fiatlux wrote:
Curious, I did not make myself clear. I was attempting to say that bathrooms should remain apparent girl and boy and not be open to interpretation or preference. To be perhaps crass, penis boy and vagina girl: no ifs, ands, or buts. Winning a seat or whatever on the bathroom war should not even be a blib on the radar of this issue. But it seems I was mistakenly taken as approving transgender use of facilities that their objective physical appearance contradicted. This is not my view.
It was hard to tell what side of the fence you were on with this issue, i took it as you were siding with the no vote and saw it as a waste of time fighting for special bathroom access.