Republicans Finally Admit Planned Parenthood Did Nothing Wrong, Investigation Was A Sham
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Hey moldy dip shit! I twice sent you a most fair article which stated and admitted the tape were presented put together not perhaps exactly in the same order they were filmed, but what was said about selling body parts was not altered or changed, that was PP's representatives words verbatim ( not altered). Also the firm hired to audit the tapes may have done a proper job, but they were not independent from pp who was footing the bill. They were a left leaning rent an expert company. Go back a few pages and find my article and actually read it with an open mind and you mind be wondering who's really bull shitting you. Evidentially you lean so far left you are going insane.
color=red b Hey moldy dip shit! I twice sent yo... (
show quote)
I went back 6 pages and did not see anything from you. I expect that you are talking about the fees for handling of fetal tissue used in research. Calling that selling body parts.
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Page 7
# ^
Oct 11, 15 01:32:00
Yankee Clipper
I read that BS before, nothing new, just your misinformed interpretation of the facts.
moldyoldy wrote:
I read that BS before, nothing new, just your misinformed interpretation of the facts.
Those baby body parts have a Union Rep ???????????
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Almost all other sites cited are far extreme leftist sites that quote the same source and cannot be trusted. At least this site gave both sides of the issue even though it leaned to the right somewhat.
The thing I don't understand, especially if you are who is pictured as your avatar, is why would you support and defend an organization whose founder wanted to eliminate your race in this country? That is well documented. See links:
http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
http://www.dianedew.com/sanger.htm
http://margaretsanger.blogspot.com/
http://www.nationalblackprolifeunion.com/Margaret-Sanger-and-The-Negro-Project.html
http://liveaction.org/research/margaret-sanger-quotes-history-and-biography
That should be enough for you.
Me, I see the issue as killing a fetus is the same as killing a baby and killing a baby is murder plain and simple. Why would you defend such actions. I can see allowing some exceptions for abortion, but only in the cases of rape, incest, or mother welfare.
Tell me and you can do it by private message if you chose, what has the Marxist/democrat party done for your race besides use it for votes to get political power?
Me personally, I want all people of all races to do well in our country because then everyone does well except those who chose not to and we'll always have some of them. That said, neither of us has an obligation to help anyone except those who have not way of helping themselves due to injuries or disease. color=red Almost all other sites cited are far ex... (
show quote)
Sanger had to comply with the beliefs being espoused at the time. As for political parties, conservatives have a hadr right agenda driven by hatred, intolerance, fundamentalism,and ignorance. Though some belong in one of these camps and not the other, they vote the same even when it hurts them. As a liberal I do not want to control your life. You can believe as you like, but give others the same rights to live free and unmolested, with equal access. By the way that blob, or fetus takes a few months to become anything.
Dave
Loc: Upstate New York
moldyoldy wrote:
Sanger had to comply with the beliefs being espoused at the time. As for political parties, conservatives have a hadr right agenda driven by hatred, intolerance, fundamentalism,and ignorance. Though some belong in one of these camps and not the other, they vote the same even when it hurts them. As a liberal I do not want to control your life. You can believe as you like, but give others the same rights to live free and unmolested, with equal access. By the way that blob, or fetus takes a few months to become anything.
Sanger had to comply with the beliefs being espous... (
show quote)
As long as you hold the view that those with different views are driven by hatred, intolerance, and ignorance you will have a closed mind and your own level of ignorance. If you can ever accept the possibility that others can have a different opinion of what is and is not for the common good you may learn something.
As a liberal you surely want to control others - just in ways that you think are good. How one can suggest they are for more government while also suggesting they want less control over the individual I struggle to understand.
As to that blob or fetus taking months to become anything - can't one say that a day old human also takes months before they become anything? How about a blob one day away from being born - has it yet become anything? How about a month before birth, two months, ....? Doesn't one need to define what they mean by "anything" when making such a statement?
Dave wrote:
As long as you hold the view that those with different views are driven by hatred, intolerance, and ignorance you will have a closed mind and your own level of ignorance. If you can ever accept the possibility that others can have a different opinion of what is and is not for the common good you may learn something.
As a liberal you surely want to control others - just in ways that you think are good. How one can suggest they are for more government while also suggesting they want less control over the individual I struggle to understand.
As to that blob or fetus taking months to become anything - can't one say that a day old human also takes months before they become anything? How about a blob one day away from being born - has it yet become anything? How about a month before birth, two months, ....? Doesn't one need to define what they mean by "anything" when making such a statement?
As long as you hold the view that those with diffe... (
show quote)
Do you think that you should have the right to tell a woman what she can do with her body, or tell a person who to love. The gov. regulations meant to protect us have been eroded by the GOP leading to financial ruin for many, less food inspectors to protect our health. GMO foods for us, that the rest of the world rejects. We get knee jerk reactions from the right just because.
Dave
Loc: Upstate New York
moldyoldy wrote:
Do you think that you should have the right to tell a woman what she can do with her body, or tell a person who to love. The gov. regulations meant to protect us have been eroded by the GOP leading to financial ruin for many, less food inspectors to protect our health. GMO foods for us, that the rest of the world rejects. We get knee jerk reactions from the right just because.
I do not think I have a right to tell a woman anything, but I do have a right to have a say in something that a woman and I took part in making. If you don't think I have a right in such an instance, do you think I have a responsibility?
I do not think I have a right to tell anyone who to love, but I also think I don't have a right to tell someone they must do something for someone who loves someone else. Do you think I should have to "honor" to "participate" in a ceremony regarding a person's love of another person?
What government regulation is it that you suggest was intended to protect us but Republicans eroded and lead us to financial ruin? Are we financially ruined?
Where did you see a reduction in food inspectors causing health problems?
What GMO foods are you required to eat that have been rejected by every other country? What evidence have you that such food endangers anyone's health?
You last assertion, about knee jerk reactions is very interesting - you display a host of knee jerk reactions from the left.
Now, a question for you - do you think you have a right to demand of a person that they be compelled to work for the benefits of others?
Yankee Clipper wrote:
Talk about knee jerk reaction, the left is foaming at the mouth trying to protect Hillary "the lying bitch" from going to prison for violating the security laws.
Another case of GOP faked freak out. There is no crime, except the bengazi pretend investigation.
Dave wrote:
I suspect you don't see the argument over cost. If PP was selling their "product" at cost there would be no need to negotiate - they'd calculate cost and establish that as price.
Therefore, any negotiation infers profit.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.