Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Yep. No doubt about it. Sheila Samples is a blogger who has her own journal at the democraticunderground website.

This excerpt is clue enough that Samples has her head so far up her ass it is shoving all the sh!t out of her mouth.

First of all, the highjackings occurred AFTER the aircraft had attained cruising altitude, the highjack pilots did not have to "get that 100 ton beast in the air."

Secondly, assuming that the cockpit of a 757 or 767 would be a mystery to a Cessna pilot shows a complete ignorance of aircraft operating fundamentals. I have visited the cockpit of a 767 and it didn't take long to locate all primary flight controls, flight, engine and fuel instrumentation, and comm panels (including radio, PA, radar, transponder, etc). It wouldn't take a rocket scientist to fly a jetliner to a target. Especially if all you had to do was take the controls after the plane was airborne.

It is obvious that the hijack pilots were not concerned with take-off and landing, nor did they have any real need for communications expertise. Flying the Flight 11 767, Atta made two transmissions picked up by ATC that were intended for the passengers.

Samples screed has nothing to do with facts, she is on a Bush hate rant.

OPP's resident conspiracy lunatic strikes again.

Scoop Henderson Loc: The Rez, (I am from Egypt)

Wow, you have not trudged off to the head yet.

payne1000

You ignore the extreme flight path alleged to have been taken by Flight 77.
Professional pilots have said it would have taken an expert pilot to accomplish that spiraling descent to hit the Pentagon at ground level.
But, of course, no plane hit the Pentagon.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=71c_1311362426

JMHO Loc: Utah

Well, all your phony posts are lame, pal. How much is Google paying you per click on all those stupid YouTube videos?

JMHO Loc: Utah

You're delusional and an idiot if you believe any of that crap!

solarkin

Commie trash.

solarkin

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

No single general has ALL intelligence under his command. That old fart is full of shit.

Question: "What hit the Pentagon?"

Answer: "I don't know what hit the Pentagon, but I do know it wasn't an airplane."

Yeah, right!

payne1000

That old fart is in the Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.

Why do you think the alleged hijackers chose to hit an area of the Pentagon where accountants were working on finding the $2.3 trillion missing from Pentagon accounting? The generals were all the way on the opposite side of the pentagon.

payne1000

Check this out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

And this:
Craig Ranke exposes 911 Pentagon witnesses
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bUA7LjJoYk

If a wing of the "airplane" hit a light pole, It would have been torn right off, way before it hit the pentagon.

and dozens more.

Scoop Henderson Loc: The Rez, (I am from Egypt)

What is the weight of the wing that would have been torn right off by the impact with a light pole?

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

I don't know.
We are talking aluminum wing vs several steel light poles.
How much does that matter?
The "plane" continued on and flew right through the hole made in the several inch thick walls (several concrete rings) and "evaporated"

The "plane" did not even hit the outer wall at a perpendicular angle, which would have caused an exterior cartwheeling effect.

That is basic physics.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

You don't know much about aircraft construction, do you? You know even less about light pole construction.

Here's a hint: aircraft wings are built to stay on the airplane. In flight, aircraft wings undergo tremendous forces from airspeed and gravity. OTH, light poles are engineered to shear off when struck by a heavy horizontal force, such as a vehicle. It's a safety thing.

rebob14

That's pretty "informative"............Any thoughts on what to do with your other brain cell?