JFlorio wrote:
Democrats in Iowa today said they are hoping a viable candidate will challenge Hillary for the Democratic nomination.
I find it somewhat interesting that in Virginia, a state that voted Terry McAuliffe as governor would not turn out in droves for Hillary. It is well known that McAuliffe is and was a very good friend and political operative of both Clintons, as well as head of the DNC. I ean, he did loan them the money for the house in Chappaqua, when they were "dead" broke after leaving the White house, right? But, then, he was elected by 48% of the vote. So, maybe the pull of the governor is not as powerful as it would seem.
To me, anyone that closely aligned with the Clintons is suspect...Can't really prove anything, but, when you lay down with dogs, as they say, you get fleas.
But, i think the main reason is that people are becoming aware that Hillary is a phony. With her, it's not just the message that is not acceptable, it's the messenger. I remember after bill was elected, Hillary wanted to share the center stage, so to speak,....An activist, political activist as a first lady. " You get two for one", as she said on the campaign trail. Double your avarice, double your fun, I suppose. While the mainstream was gushing over Hillary as "One of the most intelligent women in the world", I couldn't see it. She really failed at what she tried to do other than graduate from a University. Extraordinary? I don't think so. She did manage to manage Bill into marriage and tag on to Bill's success as an AG of Arkansas and then the governorship. But, did the nation really focus on what was going on in Arkansas during the Clinton tenure? Not really. So, we all don't know the details of HER actions as first lady of Arkansas, but, Bill's are fairly well known now. So, would a very intelligent woman stay with a philandering husband, regardless of the position he held, or would she stay for political reasons? I would think it's the latter...That is...if she was aware of what was going on. If she was not aware, then she was probably the only one in proximity that didn't know. That is an oblivious woman. Take your pick..Oblivious or cunning.
Now, as first lady, similar situations occurred... She said she had " No idea" that Bill was diddling with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky..Hmm..Seems that most everyone else close to the inner workings of the White house, including the Secret Service, knew of the relationship, they even had a code name for her. Again, oblivious, or cunningly deceptive? Willful ignorance?
Rose law firm records that were under subpoena years earlier are found in her quarters within the White House with her fingerprints on them....? She hadn't a clue how they got there. Does it strain credulity, this answer, or does it fall under..Oblivious to the obvious?....Hmm
Personally, I come down on the side of blatant liar. She is a product of the media and the DNC, period.
Her stint as NY Senator was non descript. She did essentially carpetbag the seat. No previous residence is the state, no claim to familial relations there..Nothing. But, she knew she could win. Certainly not win a senate seat from Arkansas, as they knew the Clinton's all too well.
Her performance as Sec. State? In one word, Abysmal. Not only was her conduct unlawful from the beginning, but, it appears it continues to this day. What we the people know, is most likely just a part of the whole story. What can be deciphered is bad enough to cast all doubt upon her words then and now. Those that chose to follow her and mindlessly support her fall for the facade of a lying, deceitful human being. She does not get a pass for her incompetence and lies by being a woman. Sorry, she doesn't.
She falls into the category of human behavior as a sociopath.
here are some of the characteristics....
A sociopath......
Lack of empathy Inability to feel sympathy for others or to understand the emotional consequences of their actions...Hillary and her speeches do not match with her actions. her attempts to relate to the "regular" people and their day to day struggles are in direct opposition to her wealth and greed.
Cold, calculating nature The ability and willingness to use others around them to personal gain. Take a good look at all those thrown under the bus by the Clinton's.....No, Bill isn't the only sociopath in the family.
Shallow emotions Lack of real emotion in response to events, limited capacity to feel love. The real emotion part is apparent...contrived and poll driven, she has said what is expedient when she feels it is needed.
Love? Who knows......
Narcissism A personality disorder in itself in which the individual feels strong love and admiration toward themselves. Hmm...Describes Obama as well.
Grandiose self image They might see themselves as someone who is superior to others and sometimes even experiences delusions. A sociopath might see themselves as a fitting ruler of a country or even the world, but might also have delusional beliefs such as seeing themselves as a God or having super powers. Well, I don't know about the super powers thing, but, her speech at Roosevelt Island was to fix everything that was wrong..In her mind.
Charming While the sociopath is unable to fully understand the emotions of others, they are capable but rather highly adept at mimicking them and might appear to be charming and normal at first.
Well, Hillary is hardly charming unless you are a boot licker. But, she will adopt a different "accent" when she has a different crowd, that, she does.
Manipulative Sociopaths use their superficial charm and high IQ to manipulate others to get their ends, and their lack of empathy allows them to do this with no sense of guilt or remorse. " Oh, don't worry, we are going to get the guy that made that video"..." What difference, at this time, does it make.."....Manipulative? I sure as hell can see this one!
Secretive Has little need for others and is highly secretive in their actions meaning that often critical facts are withheld. I don't know about you, but, does this not describe her almost perfectly? Her own email server for classified sensitive information? Giving emails after she has sifted and deleted?.....It doesn't take a Colombo to figure this stinks big time!
Paranoid Often their lack of understanding of emotion along with their incongruous self view means that they feel a lack of trust and paranoia.
Hmm....Controlled media, limited access to questions, having to "reset' her campaign? You be the judge.
Despotic/Authoritarian Often the sociopath will see themselves as a necessary authority and will be in favor or totalitarian rule. Enough said..But, this pretty much goes for democrats in general. They know better how to live your life as they see it.
Compulsive lying As part of their facade, and as a means to an end, sociopaths are compulsive liars and will rarely speak truthfully making them hard to pin down. Well, anyone that can believe her will....And I feel sorry for those. No one...I mean, no one, can deny she lies. Oh, you get the, " Misspoke".."Out of context".."What she really said was.."..." That's not the point..." It goes on.
The point is, Hillary Clinton is a shameful excuse for a candidate for President.
If any liberal can refute these statements I have made without changing the subject, I would love to see an attempt. Don't give me " All politicians lie" crap....Deal with Hillary as your candidate. I will vet the candidates I will vote for, and, if they display or have displayed any of the similarities to Clinton, they are off my list.
My assumption is that if you desire to vote for Hillary, you probably voted for Obama. Both are sociopaths. Can you look at yourself and say you admire a sociopath? Well, apparently many of you did.
Food for thinking.