One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trumpass SC nominee is anti- workers
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Apr 6, 2017 22:28:01   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Mr Bombastic wrote:
OK. I'll take your word for it. Hope it never happens to me.


X2!!!

Reply
Apr 6, 2017 23:23:26   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
I am s**k of hearing Trump smeared. And I am also sick to death of hearing Obama referred to as President Obama. He is "former"President Obama. My reference here didn't require much "research", just a brain and ears. Donald T***p w*n the e******n.
You all must agree that he did.


PRESIDENT WHO?????

Reply
Apr 6, 2017 23:27:48   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
bylm1 wrote:
Last year we had another poster (Bad Bob) who couldn't talk without posting stupid little pictures all the time. For some reason he left. I don't know if it was due to intelligent people getting tired of the stupid pics or if it was due to the e******n results or both.



I suspect, as much as I h**e to admit it, that Bad Bob had some p***e, almost unheard of for a liberal.
He left us right after the e******n, I guess he could not handle the humiliation!
I don't miss him or his cartoons.

Reply
Apr 6, 2017 23:34:45   #
Mr Bombastic
 
bilordinary wrote:
I suspect, as much as I h**e to admit it, that Bad Bob had some p***e, almost unheard of for a liberal.
He left us right after the e******n, I guess he could not handle the humiliation!
I don't miss him or his cartoons.


Perhaps he's finally seen the light? NAH! I doubt it.

Reply
Apr 7, 2017 19:29:23   #
karen58romans
 
Mr.bombastic wow thanks I will check it out so they don't take insurance huh

Reply
Apr 11, 2017 12:53:15   #
Mr Bombastic
 
karen58romans wrote:
Mr.bombastic wow thanks I will check it out so they don't take insurance huh


Alternative treatments rarely are covered by insurance, but you can ask. They are, often times, the only thing that really works. Pretty sad. One of the reasons I h**e pharmaceutical companies.

Reply
Apr 11, 2017 13:22:32   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Karen, You conservatives are fond of the founding fathers. They all believed that there should be no religious test for office. Not a big surprise considering many of them were deists, not even Christian. V**e for the best candidate, not your religion!!
karen58romans wrote:
Garland is an ex Muslim brotherhood. Anti constitution. We don't need no more Muslims in office they want sharia law here. We have 2 in Congress. Perez is radicalized , Ellison they thats the dnc democrats want sharia law here in America believe that it's true . Tim kaine is also been radicalized . They want our country the head imam said it . They've taken east Dearborn Michigan right now they have a 32 yr old Muslim doctor running for mayor if that happens we r Im trouble wake up .

Reply
Apr 12, 2017 10:07:07   #
bilordinary Loc: SW Washington
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Karen, You conservatives are fond of the founding fathers. They all believed that there should be no religious test for office. Not a big surprise considering many of them were deists, not even Christian. V**e for the best candidate, not your religion!!


Full body scans should be required for higher offices!
Not to discriminate but to inform.

Reply
Apr 12, 2017 15:19:37   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
bilordinary wrote:
Full body scans should be required for higher offices!
Not to discriminate but to inform.


Note they made no such reservation for immigrants. Our government is free to exclude any class, race, creed or color at will. The only issue that politicians might consider in making such decisions is the effect any inclusion or exclusion might have on electability.

Reply
Apr 12, 2017 19:57:19   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
peter11937 wrote:
Note they made no such reservation for immigrants. Our government is free to exclude any class, race, creed or color at will. The only issue that politicians might consider in making such decisions is the effect any inclusion or exclusion might have on electability.


Very true and really all they look for anyway..

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 09:09:19   #
Jack2014
 
lindajoy wrote:
Very true and really all they look for anyway..


Actually dear leader and his unqualified frussmie staffers looked for NOTHING. BUT $.GHU

Reply
Jun 2, 2017 09:41:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Jack2014 wrote:
Actually dear leader and his unqualified frussmie staffers looked for NOTHING. BUT $.GHU


How do you figure that???

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.