crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Oh, BTW, moldyoldy, SCROTUS was your President Barack H. Obama. and if your object to this., then please explain how your admiration for that man withstands his position on unrestricted a******n at any tome during pregnancy and his v****g against the Live Birth Act because it was the intent of the mother to k**l the baby (his words not mine).

Also explain his support for Planned Parenthood, an organization whose stated goal was to eliminate the negro race.

I don't expect an answer from you so why don't you take this as a cue and answer it? Surprise all of us here.

moldyoldy

The answer is, your comments are stupid and untrue.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

You may regard them as stupid but no more than I regard yours but every last bit that I wrote about him & a******n and Planned Parenthood are 100% true. You can look it up.

MatthewlovesAyn Loc: Ohio

And another thing: Ayn Rand and Rand Paul wouldn't let Paul Ryan at their poker table, let alone invite him for dinner.

moldyoldy

Prove your lies or shut up.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

I guess you can't read either. These things are known and accepted history. And I won't shut up about that excuse for a president that just vacated 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

moldyoldy

Most of what you accept is false. Like trump quoting the national enquirer

PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco

Guess we have to call ourselves even.
(Though my joke did poke fun at my own community. Your turn.)

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

I'll leave it at that. You know PaulPisces, you may really be OK. But why not lighten up a bit? You catch more with honey than vinegar. I try to never deteriorate into name calling.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Read the history of Planned Parenthood. And your precious president, Barack H. Obama was its biggest p**********l benefactor. And he did v**e against the Live Birth Act.

moldyoldy

Rand on race.
The theory that holds “good blood” and “bad blood” as a moral-intellectual criterion, can lead to nothing but torrents of blood in practice.  Brute force is the only avenue of action open to men who regard themselves as mindless aggregates of chemicals.
Modern r****ts attempt to prove the superiority or inferiority of a given race by the historical achievements of some of its members.  The frequent historical spectacle of a great innovator who, in his lifetime, is jeered, denounced, obstructed, persecuted by his countrymen, and then, a few years after his death, is enshrined in a national monument and hailed as a proof of greatness of the German (or French or Italian or Cambodian) race—is as revolting a spectacle of collectivist expropriation, perpetrated by r****ts, as any expropriation of material wealth perpetrated by c*******ts.
Just as there is no such thing as a collective or racial mind, so there is no such thing as a collective or racial achievement.  There are only individual minds and individual achievements—and a culture is not the anonymous product of undifferentiated masses, but the sum of the intellectual achievements of individual men.

CBN Correspondent David Brody: Real quick, the born alive infant protection act. I gotta tell you that’s the one thing I get a lot of emails about and it’s just not just from Evangelicals, it about Catholics, Protestants, main – they’re trying to understand it because there was some literature put out by the National Right to Life Committee. And they’re basically saying they felt like you misrepresented your position on that bill.
Obama: Let me clarify this right now.
Brody: Because it’s getting a lot of play.
Obama: Well and because they have not been telling the t***h. And I h**e to say that people are lying, but here’s a situation where folks are lying. I have said repeatedly that I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported – which was to say – that you should provide assistance to any infant that was born – even if it was as a consequence of an induced a******n. That was not the bill that was presented at the state level. What that bill also was doing was trying to undermine Roe vs. Wade.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

The bill, as worded, was approved such right-to-life anti-a******n stalwarts as Ted Kennedy, whom you may remember, and Nancy Pelosi. In another interview he gave as his reason that it was the mother's intent to k**l the fetus. what cold be worse than that. And what's the matter with undermining Roe vs. Wade? It was a horrible decision. You should read it. It appalled a pro-a******n Harvard law professor.