One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
2 From Jihad Watch 3/26/2017...
Mar 26, 2017 09:22:29   #
Don G. Dinsdale Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
 
I Knew At Some Point All This K*****g By Islamic Jihadist Would Be The Fault of We Infidels, Now The European "Politically Correct" Politicans Have Come Right Out And Said It... COMING TO AMERICA SOON, IF NOT ALREADY HERE... Don D.

France: Veiled Muslim Woman Threatens Passersby With a Knife

By Robert Spencer ~ March 25, 2017 ~ Jihad Watch

“Veiled from head to foot, the accused had already tried, while threatening people with her 20-centimeter blade, to enter the church of Saint-Benigne and had gone, still threatening, to rue Michelet.”

There needs to be a Study forthwith of the rising “Islamophobia” in Dijon that drove this POOR DEAR to do this.

“Dijon: the veiled woman who threatened passersby had been spoken to an hour before,” t***slated from “Dijon : la femme voilée qui a menacé des passants avait été verbalisée une heure avant,” Le Bien Public, March 24, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

On Friday around 2PM, police arrested a 20-year-old woman who was threatening passersby with a knife. The intervention section proceeded to arrest her in a perfumery on rue Mably in Dijon.

Veiled from head to foot, the accused had already tried, while threatening people with her 20-centimeter blade (8 In.), to enter the church of Saint-Benigne and had gone, still threatening, to rue Michelet. She was placed in police custody at the Suquet police station.

According to our information, the woman arrested by the police officers of the intervention section had been checked and spoken to for concealing her face in public space (the law of October 11, 2010 stipulates that nobody can, in a public space, wear an outfit designed to hide the face, on the grounds that this practice is contrary to the values ​​that underpin the values of the Republic and undermines the dignity of the person) by a police patrol about an hour before brandishing his knife.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/03/france-veiled-muslim-woman-threatens-passersby-with-a-knife



I'M IGNORANT OF MANY THINGS, ONE IS DOES ENGLAND HAVE "FREE SPEECH"??? AND IS THIS A PRELUDE TO THAT ENDING??? Don D.

Theresa May: “The Fight Against Terrorism And H**e Speech Has To Be a Joint One”

By Robert Spencer ~ March 25, 2017 ~ Jihad Watch

By this May means, as Pamela Geller has pointed out, that “the fight against jihad and those who oppose jihad is a joint one.” This is because opposition to jihad terror is routinely characterized by Theresa May and her colleagues as “h**e speech.” It has been a years-long chess game: first came the charge, ridiculous on its face but relentlessly and indefatigably repeated, that to speak honestly about how jihad terrorists use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims constituted “h**e.” Then came the likewise specious charge that “h**e speech” was not “free speech,” and was capable of being identified by neutral, impartial observers, and that it did not deserve the protection that various governments gave to the freedom of speech.

None of that is true. In reality, h**e speech is a subjective judgment based on the political perspectives of the one doing the evaluating, and freedom of speech protections were first instituted in order to ensure that speech that was h**ed by the party in power could still be aired: the freedom of speech is our fundamental bulwark against tyranny, and prevents tyrants from declaring opposition to their will to be “h**e speech” and thereby outlaw it.

But I never was any good at chess, and now Facebook and Twitter have blocked 90% of their daily referrals from Jihad Watch, and the site is blocked by many Internet service providers in the UK and Europe. Soon, apparently, Google will follow suit.

“Exclusive: Google and social media companies could be prosecuted if they show extremist videos,” by Christopher Hope and Laura Hughes, Telegraph, March 24, 2017 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Google, Facebook and other internet companies could be prosecuted if they do not stop extremist videos from being seen on their websites by people in Britain, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

Ministers are considering a new law which would mean Google – which owns YouTube – and other social media sites like Facebook and Twitter can be prosecuted if they allow such videos to be disseminated.

Theresa May, the Prime Minister, made clear her displeasure at internet companies that publish extremist content on Friday, saying “the ball is in their court” over taking action.

Google publicly apologized this week after the growing scandal over extremist videos on YouTube led to a series of companies pulling their adverts from the internet giant.

Google, which owns the video sharing website YouTube, and other social media sites have an agreement to take down extremist content within 24 hours when they are alerted to it.

But ministers are worried that this still allows the videos to be viewed thousands of times before they are taken down.

However ministers in the Home Office are now looking at a new law to force the websites to take down content immediately or face court action.

Officials are trying to work out how the law can be enforced in the UK given that many films that can be seen in the UK are hosted on foreign websites.

One source said: “We want to see them take on their responsibility. The problem with the law is in itself we can do what we can but these are global companies.”

The Home Office’s talks with the internet companies are being led by Baroness Shields, who as Joanna Shields was a former Facebook executive.

The news came as Mrs May’s spokesman said that “social media companies can and must do more”.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “The fight against terrorism and h**e speech has to be a joint one. The government and security services are doing everything they can and it is clear that social media companies can and must do more.

“Social media companies have a responsibility when it comes to making sure this material is not disseminated and we have been clear repeatedly that we think that they can and must do more. We are always talking with them on how to achieve that

“The ball is now in their court. We will see how they respond.”…

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/03/theresa-may-the-fight-against-terrorism-and-h**e-speech-has-to-be-a-joint-one

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.