Steve700

After completely destroying the Turd's anti-Christian Marxist propaganda talking points rant, this was his reply:

Steve700 Wrote: It is the nature of evil to h**e good and not understand the righteous. There have been lots of nice, but spoiled and morally weak people who have been perverted by leftism and you may be one of them. It is easy to be perverted by leftism when you are selfish, immature, narcissistic and arrogant, lacking in morals, ethics, values, personal responsibility, honesty and discipline. (All of which greatly contributes to you being an angry malcontent -- the perfect condition for accepting Marxist propaganda and hating traditional American views) Your lack of discipline and desire to remain in a comfort zone makes self-delusion and willful blindness easy for you. You are a lost reprobate with your psychological defense mechanisms working overtime. In short, an undisciplined degenerate with (defiant opposition disorder) that is happy to remain just that and therefore irredeemable and hopelessly stupid to the core. May God have mercy on you.



Steve700 Wrote: If you can't defend yourself against t***h because there is no honest defense against t***h and if T***h Offends Your Evil and Angry Malcontented Mind, why do you even bother to open my messages ?????? Is there an imprisoned rational mind in there screaming to be set free or are you just a masochist ????????????

Or perhapse, although you can't compete or learn anything maybe you just enjoy an exchange with a higher intelligence

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Give up Steve 700. He's a leftwing lying troll. Waste of time.

Steve700

I agree except for that these typical angry left-wing malcontents with their asinine self-deluded mentality and defiant opposition disorder and with their inability to recognize, accept or learn t***h need to be put on display and exposed for the self-deluded ignorant lowlifes they are.

JW

They do that every time they post. You calling attention to them is redundancy.

Steve700

Yeah, but what else am I supposed to to do with my time as an old retired guy? Besides, I've got to vent my frustrations from my rejected efforts to educate these dangerous dip s**t morons who at least would be embarrassed if they had more sense.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Why would you send someone a 'Private' message and then make it public?

pafret Loc: Northeast

Reference please, who did this?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

The Russians leaked it.

Steve700

Why Not ??? --- The better question is "Why do you ask a stupid question that I have just given the answer to in the last post directly above the post you made to ask it ????????"

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Read the 1st post in this thread if you want to know what we're taking about.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

The question wasn't stupid because it gave you the opportunity to give a valid answer.

But you declined.

What part of "Private" confused you?

Ricko Loc: Florida

Jim-good advice. Tdsrnest has not had an original thought in years. His primary goal in bashing Trump is
designed to prevent repeal of the ACA because his son, who appears to be more of a man than his dad,
desperately needs coverage which td thinks will be taken from him. Additionally, td professes to be wealthy
but prefers that the hard working taxpayer subsidize his son's insurance premiums so that he does not have
to use any of his supposed wealth to help him. Thus the reason for his continued mindless rants which should be ignored. I empathize with his son because it appears as though he is on his own. America First !!!

pafret Loc: Northeast

Looked at that damned title and thought it was an abbreviation for Prime Minister, didn't make any sense either way, a PM in an explicit post. These abreviations are giving me a BM.

Steve700

I told you that I answered that question in the 1st post just above your post where you asked it. If you're concerned about private thinking that a private message should be and remain private, I was not communicating with him because I wanted it private and I don't think either of us were thinking about or caring about privacy. I first contacted him outside of the regular debate forum to tell him something I was not even looking for a response about -- not because I was trying to be private. What about that, which I would think should have been obvious, confused you? --------------- No, don't bother to answer that.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

This being a relatively free country, you don't need a rational reason, so please continue to embarrass yourself.