The Times Loves The Muslim Brotherhood? I Guess So!
Feb 23, 2017 21:31:40 #
You Know how many of us here on OPP have talked about the issues surrounding the Muslim Silent Jihad going on in the U.S.? I believe we can all here at least most of us think that Obama is a closet Muslim. If Im mistaken please let me know so we can talk about it. Personnaly I think there is just too much evidence to contradict my views on this. But in any event, the MOOSllims as The Doctor of Common Sense on You Tube says, there has been a complete infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood through out the Governement I am absolutely convinced thanks to Obamas invitation and who knows perhaps even before him? Look at the Keith Ellis Turd Muncher trying to become the fricken DNC or as I refer to them as the DEMMUNIST CLUB/CAUCUS. He is a prime example of Muslim and C*******t (MUSLIMUNIST ?) HMMM!
BROTHERHOOD A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
The Times’ crusade culminated in the newspaper’s publication on Wednesday of an oped written from Egyptian prison by Gehad el-Haddad, the official spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood. The oped was splashed on the cover of Thursday’s international edition of the newspaper.
new-york-times-muslim-brotherhood-president-trump
by Geoffrey Grider February 23, 2017
THE NEW YORK TIMES THIS WEEK CONTINUED ITS MONTH-LONG CAMPAIGN AGAINST DESIGNATING THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION AMID REPORTS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS DEBATING THE POSSIBILITY OF ISSUING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER MAKING SUCH A DESIGNATION.
Declaring the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization would add the U.S. to the growing list of nations to do so, including Muslim countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
The Times’ crusade culminated in the newspaper’s publication on Wednesday of an oped written from Egyptian prison by Gehad el-Haddad, the official spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood. The oped was splashed on the cover of Thursday’s international edition of the newspaper.
In the piece, Haddad whitewashed the Brotherhood as inspired by an “understanding of Islam that emphasizes the values of social justice, e******y and the rule of law.”
“We remain committed to our ideals of community development, social justice and nonviolence,” wrote Haddad.
While many Brotherhood wings indeed reject the use of violence as a strategic tactic, preferring instead a sophisticated gradualist strategy to achieve their aims, Haddad failed to mention that the Brotherhood has spawned terrorist organizations – most notably Hamas – that adhere to its philosophy of a world order based on Islam.
AL-QAEDA WAS FOUNDED IN PART ON BROTHERHOOD IDEOLOGY. THE BROTHERHOOD WAS ALSO A CENTRAL PLAYER IN THE SO-CALLED ARAB SPRING, REVOLUTIONS PUNCTUATED BY VIOLENCE ACROSS THE ARAB WORLD.
Haddad’s claim that the Brotherhood espouses an understanding of Islam that pushes for “e******y and the rule of law” is contradicted by the very nature of the Brotherhood itself, which is openly committed to the establishment of a worldwide Islamic caliph**e based on Sharia law.
Sharia does not propagate “e******y and the rule of law.” Sharia is explicitly anti-democratic and advocates Islamic supremacy over non-Muslims. For example, under Sharia non-Muslims cannot rule over Muslims; a woman inherits half that of a man; non-Muslims cannot inherit from Muslims or marry Muslim women; and churches and synagogues cannot be built taller than mosques.
THESE ISLAMIC DICTATES WERE SCRUBBED FROM HADDAD’S AIRY DESCRIPTIONS OF THE BROTHERHOOD IN THE TIMES OPED:
WE ARE A MORALLY CONSERVATIVE, SOCIALLY AWARE GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT THAT HAS DEDICATED ITS RESOURCES TO PUBLIC SERVICE FOR THE PAST NINE DECADES. OUR IDEA IS VERY SIMPLE: WE BELIEVE THAT FAITH MUST T***SLATE INTO ACTION. THAT THE TEST OF FAITH IS THE GOOD YOU WANT TO DO IN THE LIVES OF OTHERS, AND THAT PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER IS THE ONLY WAY TO DEVELOP A NATION, MEET THE ASPIRATIONS OF ITS YOUTH AND ENGAGE THE WORLD CONSTRUCTIVELY. WE BELIEVE THAT OUR FAITH IS INHERENTLY PLURALISTIC AND COMPREHENSIVE AND THAT NO ONE HAS A DIVINE MANDATE OR THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE A SINGLE VISION ON SOCIETY. WE REMAIN COMMITTED TO OUR IDEALS OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND NONVIOLENCE.
Haddad’s propaganda piece was preceded on Monday by a Times article reporting on the alleged dangers of the Trump administration labeling the Brotherhood a terrorist organization.
That article, titled, “Trump Talk of Terror Listing for Muslim Brotherhood Alarms Some Arab Allies,” warned that “of all the initiatives of the Trump administration that have set the Arab world on edge, none has as much potential to disrupt the internal politics of American partners in the region as the proposal to criminalize the Muslim Brotherhood, the preeminent Islamist movement with millions of followers.”
The piece continued:
In Morocco, it would tip a delicate political balance. In Jordan, it could prevent American diplomats from meeting with opposition leaders. In Tunisia, it could make criminals of a political party seen as a model of democracy after the Arab Spring.
The Times article quoted Issandr El Amrani, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, warning that designating the Brotherhood a terrorist organization “could destabilize countries where anti-Islamist forces would be encouraged to double down. It would increase polarization.”
The International Crisis Group is funded by billionaire George Soros and his son, Alexander Soros. Both George and Alexander Soros sit on the group’s board of trustees.
Toward the end of the piece, Times reporter Delcan Walsh briefly mentions the Brotherhood’s ties to violence.
He writes:
By nature secretive, the Brotherhood takes different forms around the world. In some places, its members have condoned or committed violent acts. Its Palestinian offshoot, Hamas, carries out suicide bombings; in Egypt, angry young supporters have been accused of attacking Mr. Sisi’s security forces.
However, that paragraph was followed by the following disclaimer: “But that does not make terrorists of the many millions of people who support the Brotherhood’s political ideology across many countries.”
The Times advocacy this week on behalf of the Brotherhood is part of a larger lobbying effort that has in recent weeks included numerous pro-Brotherhood articles and an editorial board piece published earlier this month, “All of Islam Isn’t the Enemy.”
In the editorial, the newspaper warned designating the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization “would be seen by many Muslims as another attempt to vilify adherents of Islam.” The paper claimed that the possible designation “appears to be part of a mission by the president and his closest advisers to heighten fears by promoting a dangerously exaggerated vision of an America under siege by what they call radical Islam.”
A February 7 article warned, “Officially designating the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization would roil American relations in the Middle East. The leaders of some American allies — like Egypt, where the military forced the Brotherhood from power in 2013, and the United Arab Emirates — have pressed Mr. Trump to do so to quash internal enemies, but the group remains a pillar of society in parts of the region.”
“Critics said they feared that Mr. Trump’s team wanted to create a legal justification to crack down on Muslim charities, mosques and other groups in the United States,” added the Times. “A terrorist designation would freeze assets, block visas and ban financial interactions.”
A Times article on February 1 was titled, “Trump Pushes Dark View of Islam to Center of U.S. Policy-Making.”
The article lamented a worldview that “conflates terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State with largely nonviolent groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoots and, at times, with the 1.7 billion Muslims around the world.”
A January 26 editorial titled “‘I Think Islam H**es Us’” informed readers the Trump administration “reportedly is considering designating the Muslim Brotherhood, which is involved in Muslim politics in a number of countries, as a terrorist organization. Some experts see the move as a chance for the Trump administration to limit Muslim political activity in the United States.”
The Times’ advocacy for the Brotherhood is particularly noteworthy since it separately posted a full Arabic document from 1991 in which an Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood member set forth a strategy for “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within,” with emphasis on operations inside the U.S.
Addressing the Brotherhood’s support for the e*******l process and purportedly becoming a political organization, an extensive report on the Brotherhood by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at Israel’s Center for Special Studies explained the group’s use of some tools of democracy to advance the aim of achieving a world ruled by Sharia law, which is by definition anti-democratic.
Drawing from founding Brotherhood documents and original literature by Brotherhood leaders, the Center explained:
Unlike the militant factions of other Islamist movements, which completely rule out democracy on the basis of it being a Western, pagan, and ignorant idea, the Muslim Brotherhood does use the term “democracy.” In its view, however, it has two main connotations: a tactical, instrumental means of taking over countries through the use of the democratic process, and an “Islamic democracy” based on Sharia law (i.e., Islamic religious law) and a model of internal consultation within the leadership.
[Brotherhood Founder Sheikh Hassan] Al-Banna listed seven stages to achieve these objectives, each to be carried out in a gradual fashion. The stages are divided into social and political: the first three are based on educating the individual, the family, and the entire society of the Muslim world to implement Sharia laws in every aspect of daily life. The next four stages are political in nature, and include assuming power through e******ns, shaping a Sharia state, liberating Islamic countries from the burden of (physical and ideological) foreign occupation, uniting them into one Islamic entity (“new caliph**e”), and spreading Islamic values throughout the world.
The defining works of Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leader, ideologue and theorist Sayyid Qutb, considered the Brotherhood’s intellectual godfather, greatly influenced Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda doctrine.
An extensive March 23, 2003, article in the New York Times magazine by Paul Berman dissected Qutb’s writings as they relate to terrorist ideology.
In the article titled “The Philosopher of Islamic Terror,” Berman documented the centrality of Qutb’s influence on al-Qaeda:
The organization (al-Qaeda) was created in the late 1980’s by an affiliation of three armed factions – bin Laden’s circle of ”Afghan” Arabs, together with two factions from Egypt, the Islamic Group and Egyptian Islamic Jihad, the latter led by Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al Qaeda’s top theoretician. The Egyptian factions emerged from an older current, a school of thought from within Egypt’s fundamentalist movement, the Muslim Brotherhood, in the 1950’s and 60’s. And at the heart of that single school of thought stood, until his execution in 1966, a philosopher named Sayyid Qutb – the intellectual hero of every one of the groups that eventually went into Al Qaeda, their Karl Marx (to put it that way), their guide. source
BROTHERHOOD A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION
The Times’ crusade culminated in the newspaper’s publication on Wednesday of an oped written from Egyptian prison by Gehad el-Haddad, the official spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood. The oped was splashed on the cover of Thursday’s international edition of the newspaper.
new-york-times-muslim-brotherhood-president-trump
by Geoffrey Grider February 23, 2017
THE NEW YORK TIMES THIS WEEK CONTINUED ITS MONTH-LONG CAMPAIGN AGAINST DESIGNATING THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION AMID REPORTS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS DEBATING THE POSSIBILITY OF ISSUING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER MAKING SUCH A DESIGNATION.
Declaring the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization would add the U.S. to the growing list of nations to do so, including Muslim countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
The Times’ crusade culminated in the newspaper’s publication on Wednesday of an oped written from Egyptian prison by Gehad el-Haddad, the official spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood. The oped was splashed on the cover of Thursday’s international edition of the newspaper.
In the piece, Haddad whitewashed the Brotherhood as inspired by an “understanding of Islam that emphasizes the values of social justice, e******y and the rule of law.”
“We remain committed to our ideals of community development, social justice and nonviolence,” wrote Haddad.
While many Brotherhood wings indeed reject the use of violence as a strategic tactic, preferring instead a sophisticated gradualist strategy to achieve their aims, Haddad failed to mention that the Brotherhood has spawned terrorist organizations – most notably Hamas – that adhere to its philosophy of a world order based on Islam.
AL-QAEDA WAS FOUNDED IN PART ON BROTHERHOOD IDEOLOGY. THE BROTHERHOOD WAS ALSO A CENTRAL PLAYER IN THE SO-CALLED ARAB SPRING, REVOLUTIONS PUNCTUATED BY VIOLENCE ACROSS THE ARAB WORLD.
Haddad’s claim that the Brotherhood espouses an understanding of Islam that pushes for “e******y and the rule of law” is contradicted by the very nature of the Brotherhood itself, which is openly committed to the establishment of a worldwide Islamic caliph**e based on Sharia law.
Sharia does not propagate “e******y and the rule of law.” Sharia is explicitly anti-democratic and advocates Islamic supremacy over non-Muslims. For example, under Sharia non-Muslims cannot rule over Muslims; a woman inherits half that of a man; non-Muslims cannot inherit from Muslims or marry Muslim women; and churches and synagogues cannot be built taller than mosques.
THESE ISLAMIC DICTATES WERE SCRUBBED FROM HADDAD’S AIRY DESCRIPTIONS OF THE BROTHERHOOD IN THE TIMES OPED:
WE ARE A MORALLY CONSERVATIVE, SOCIALLY AWARE GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT THAT HAS DEDICATED ITS RESOURCES TO PUBLIC SERVICE FOR THE PAST NINE DECADES. OUR IDEA IS VERY SIMPLE: WE BELIEVE THAT FAITH MUST T***SLATE INTO ACTION. THAT THE TEST OF FAITH IS THE GOOD YOU WANT TO DO IN THE LIVES OF OTHERS, AND THAT PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER IS THE ONLY WAY TO DEVELOP A NATION, MEET THE ASPIRATIONS OF ITS YOUTH AND ENGAGE THE WORLD CONSTRUCTIVELY. WE BELIEVE THAT OUR FAITH IS INHERENTLY PLURALISTIC AND COMPREHENSIVE AND THAT NO ONE HAS A DIVINE MANDATE OR THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE A SINGLE VISION ON SOCIETY. WE REMAIN COMMITTED TO OUR IDEALS OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SOCIAL JUSTICE AND NONVIOLENCE.
Haddad’s propaganda piece was preceded on Monday by a Times article reporting on the alleged dangers of the Trump administration labeling the Brotherhood a terrorist organization.
That article, titled, “Trump Talk of Terror Listing for Muslim Brotherhood Alarms Some Arab Allies,” warned that “of all the initiatives of the Trump administration that have set the Arab world on edge, none has as much potential to disrupt the internal politics of American partners in the region as the proposal to criminalize the Muslim Brotherhood, the preeminent Islamist movement with millions of followers.”
The piece continued:
In Morocco, it would tip a delicate political balance. In Jordan, it could prevent American diplomats from meeting with opposition leaders. In Tunisia, it could make criminals of a political party seen as a model of democracy after the Arab Spring.
The Times article quoted Issandr El Amrani, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, warning that designating the Brotherhood a terrorist organization “could destabilize countries where anti-Islamist forces would be encouraged to double down. It would increase polarization.”
The International Crisis Group is funded by billionaire George Soros and his son, Alexander Soros. Both George and Alexander Soros sit on the group’s board of trustees.
Toward the end of the piece, Times reporter Delcan Walsh briefly mentions the Brotherhood’s ties to violence.
He writes:
By nature secretive, the Brotherhood takes different forms around the world. In some places, its members have condoned or committed violent acts. Its Palestinian offshoot, Hamas, carries out suicide bombings; in Egypt, angry young supporters have been accused of attacking Mr. Sisi’s security forces.
However, that paragraph was followed by the following disclaimer: “But that does not make terrorists of the many millions of people who support the Brotherhood’s political ideology across many countries.”
The Times advocacy this week on behalf of the Brotherhood is part of a larger lobbying effort that has in recent weeks included numerous pro-Brotherhood articles and an editorial board piece published earlier this month, “All of Islam Isn’t the Enemy.”
In the editorial, the newspaper warned designating the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization “would be seen by many Muslims as another attempt to vilify adherents of Islam.” The paper claimed that the possible designation “appears to be part of a mission by the president and his closest advisers to heighten fears by promoting a dangerously exaggerated vision of an America under siege by what they call radical Islam.”
A February 7 article warned, “Officially designating the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization would roil American relations in the Middle East. The leaders of some American allies — like Egypt, where the military forced the Brotherhood from power in 2013, and the United Arab Emirates — have pressed Mr. Trump to do so to quash internal enemies, but the group remains a pillar of society in parts of the region.”
“Critics said they feared that Mr. Trump’s team wanted to create a legal justification to crack down on Muslim charities, mosques and other groups in the United States,” added the Times. “A terrorist designation would freeze assets, block visas and ban financial interactions.”
A Times article on February 1 was titled, “Trump Pushes Dark View of Islam to Center of U.S. Policy-Making.”
The article lamented a worldview that “conflates terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State with largely nonviolent groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoots and, at times, with the 1.7 billion Muslims around the world.”
A January 26 editorial titled “‘I Think Islam H**es Us’” informed readers the Trump administration “reportedly is considering designating the Muslim Brotherhood, which is involved in Muslim politics in a number of countries, as a terrorist organization. Some experts see the move as a chance for the Trump administration to limit Muslim political activity in the United States.”
The Times’ advocacy for the Brotherhood is particularly noteworthy since it separately posted a full Arabic document from 1991 in which an Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood member set forth a strategy for “eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within,” with emphasis on operations inside the U.S.
Addressing the Brotherhood’s support for the e*******l process and purportedly becoming a political organization, an extensive report on the Brotherhood by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at Israel’s Center for Special Studies explained the group’s use of some tools of democracy to advance the aim of achieving a world ruled by Sharia law, which is by definition anti-democratic.
Drawing from founding Brotherhood documents and original literature by Brotherhood leaders, the Center explained:
Unlike the militant factions of other Islamist movements, which completely rule out democracy on the basis of it being a Western, pagan, and ignorant idea, the Muslim Brotherhood does use the term “democracy.” In its view, however, it has two main connotations: a tactical, instrumental means of taking over countries through the use of the democratic process, and an “Islamic democracy” based on Sharia law (i.e., Islamic religious law) and a model of internal consultation within the leadership.
[Brotherhood Founder Sheikh Hassan] Al-Banna listed seven stages to achieve these objectives, each to be carried out in a gradual fashion. The stages are divided into social and political: the first three are based on educating the individual, the family, and the entire society of the Muslim world to implement Sharia laws in every aspect of daily life. The next four stages are political in nature, and include assuming power through e******ns, shaping a Sharia state, liberating Islamic countries from the burden of (physical and ideological) foreign occupation, uniting them into one Islamic entity (“new caliph**e”), and spreading Islamic values throughout the world.
The defining works of Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leader, ideologue and theorist Sayyid Qutb, considered the Brotherhood’s intellectual godfather, greatly influenced Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda doctrine.
An extensive March 23, 2003, article in the New York Times magazine by Paul Berman dissected Qutb’s writings as they relate to terrorist ideology.
In the article titled “The Philosopher of Islamic Terror,” Berman documented the centrality of Qutb’s influence on al-Qaeda:
The organization (al-Qaeda) was created in the late 1980’s by an affiliation of three armed factions – bin Laden’s circle of ”Afghan” Arabs, together with two factions from Egypt, the Islamic Group and Egyptian Islamic Jihad, the latter led by Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, Al Qaeda’s top theoretician. The Egyptian factions emerged from an older current, a school of thought from within Egypt’s fundamentalist movement, the Muslim Brotherhood, in the 1950’s and 60’s. And at the heart of that single school of thought stood, until his execution in 1966, a philosopher named Sayyid Qutb – the intellectual hero of every one of the groups that eventually went into Al Qaeda, their Karl Marx (to put it that way), their guide. source
Feb 23, 2017 21:42:52 #
Don G. Dinsdale
Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
I have no proof mind you, but I think Obama was and is a Muslim and was a "plant" from the time he was just a kid, I read that a Saudi prince paid doe his education, maybe that's why his records are sealed??? Don D.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2bltap wrote:
You Know how many of us here on OPP have talked ab... (show quote)
Feb 23, 2017 22:05:51 #
Don, Criminals have been put away serious cirumstantial evidence in the past, and I will stand my ground with the types of (I Guess?) mounting circumstantial evidence over the years that he is in fact a Manchurian Candidate. So I whole heartily agree with your assesment!
Semper Fi
Semper Fi
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
I have no proof mind you, but I think Obama was and is a Muslim and was a "plant" from the time he was just a kid, I read that a Saudi prince paid doe his education, maybe that's why his records are sealed??? Don D.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Feb 24, 2017 19:02:37 #
2bltap wrote:
Don, Criminals have been put away serious cirumsta... (show quote)
Barack Hussein Obama, what more proof did you need to know that the sunnavab***h is a Muslim? Gay too, loved the ticky tacky hand jive moves he always made coming down or up steps. Sumbish makes Tim Gunn look like a lumberjack.
Feb 24, 2017 19:54:36 #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
I have no proof mind you, but I think Obama was and is a Muslim and was a "plant" from the time he was just a kid, I read that a Saudi prince paid doe his education, maybe that's why his records are sealed??? Don D.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There must be some reason. How could he be vetted with all records sealed, no birth certificate, a false name and registered in school by his mother as"Muslim". His step father had his name changed to Soetoro and no record that he returned legally to Obama or denounced his Indonesian citizenship. How could America have been so blinded by a first black president who promised change and no one asked "what change"? I guess we
found out! On top of all that, Michelle is not a woman and the children were adopted or bought. I discovered pics of the Obamas, daughters, and real parents on vacation. I can't tell you where because I was googling something else and it came up. I don't have a computer, only an iPad.
Feb 24, 2017 19:56:42 #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
I have no proof mind you, but I think Obama was and is a Muslim and was a "plant" from the time he was just a kid, I read that a Saudi prince paid doe his education, maybe that's why his records are sealed??? Don D.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are right!
Feb 24, 2017 20:16:04 #
bggamers
Loc: georgia
2bltap wrote:
You Know how many of us here on OPP have talked ab... (show quote)
What is wrong with these people there a lot of countrys that have already named them as terrorist and I think banned them from their country
Feb 24, 2017 20:21:16 #
Don G. Dinsdale
Loc: El Cajon, CA (San Diego County)
He had a good line of "BS".... Don D.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carol Kelly wrote:
There must be some reason. How could he be vetted... (show quote)
Feb 24, 2017 22:37:19 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
There must be some reason. How could he be vetted... (show quote)
Bravo, the obamas are very lucky to have ridden the biggest lie support system ever assembled in history. Obama is a gay kenyan Muslim Marxist. Michelle a t****y. The kids, rented.
Biggest h**x ever perpetrated on America.
And yet, the media and everyone in Washington DC supports the lies. Too much invested for them to come clean.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.