One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Overlooked phenomena
Feb 22, 2017 09:38:01   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
I've mentioned this statistic before, but here it is again; there are 11 million i*****l i*******ts. Personally, I object to calling them "immigrants", but that's another story. For this post, that magic number "11 million" is the focus. A respected Republican operative mentioned that number again last night. For at least 10 years in a row, there have been exactly 11 million i******s running around. How in the hell are they able to keep their numbers stable with i******s rushing across the border daily?

It isn't at all reasonable to assume that the 11 million people today, are the same 11 million that were here 10 years ago - unless we're deporting the same folks over and over, and no new folks make it across. The thing is, if this number has remained stable for a decade, why are we so damned concerned about it? It can't be crime, since the ratio of violent crimes committed by citizens to those committed by i******s is 34:1. We'd be trying to deport natural born Americans if crime was the motivation. It can't be jobs either, as very few ( if any ) i******s take jobs Americans would lower themselves to do. It isn't disease or threats of terrorists either, so what IS the reason we are so concerned about i******s, to the extent that we pay a higher priority to them at the rate of 100:1, with the "1" being Citizens?

The simple answer is: it's easier to solve a non problem, than it is to solve a real problem. That's great, for e******n purposes, but what then? What happens when all i******s are gone? How will politicians explain crime and jobless rates that don't change? Well, they'll simply blame it on another population that isn't the problem, and move the focus there. Out of a population of 320 million or so, we spend an inordinate amount of energy and treasure on these i******s, making them more important than our own citizens. Not counting Medicare and Social Security, which is our own money, we spend an average of $2 more per illegal, than we do on our own citizens. What f&cking sense does THAT make?

Since the i******s are good at self limiting their population, being able to maintain it at 11 million, it seems we could divert more resources to caring for our own folks. Let's try to reduce violent crime among citizens, you know, bring it down to at least 20:1 or something. Let's try to create more jobs, jobs Americans will actually show up for, and let i******s continue to enrich business people with cheap labor. Let's stop letting politicians use i******s as a scapegoats for their inability to solve real problems, and force them to do some real work. Let's see if we can create some jobs other than wall building, you know, some jobs that won't be taking money out of OUR pockets.

Of course, if hype and rhetoric could be bottled and sold, politicians would be rich............wait a minute............politicians ARE rich............I guess they DID bottle that crap after all - and WE bought it.

Reply
Feb 22, 2017 10:54:54   #
EL Loc: Massachusetts
 
lpnmajor wrote:
I've mentioned this statistic before, but here it is again; there are 11 million i*****l i*******ts. Personally, I object to calling them "immigrants", but that's another story. For this post, that magic number "11 million" is the focus. A respected Republican operative mentioned that number again last night. For at least 10 years in a row, there have been exactly 11 million i******s running around. How in the hell are they able to keep their numbers stable with i******s rushing across the border daily?

It isn't at all reasonable to assume that the 11 million people today, are the same 11 million that were here 10 years ago - unless we're deporting the same folks over and over, and no new folks make it across. The thing is, if this number has remained stable for a decade, why are we so damned concerned about it? It can't be crime, since the ratio of violent crimes committed by citizens to those committed by i******s is 34:1. We'd be trying to deport natural born Americans if crime was the motivation. It can't be jobs either, as very few ( if any ) i******s take jobs Americans would lower themselves to do. It isn't disease or threats of terrorists either, so what IS the reason we are so concerned about i******s, to the extent that we pay a higher priority to them at the rate of 100:1, with the "1" being Citizens?

The simple answer is: it's easier to solve a non problem, than it is to solve a real problem. That's great, for e******n purposes, but what then? What happens when all i******s are gone? How will politicians explain crime and jobless rates that don't change? Well, they'll simply blame it on another population that isn't the problem, and move the focus there. Out of a population of 320 million or so, we spend an inordinate amount of energy and treasure on these i******s, making them more important than our own citizens. Not counting Medicare and Social Security, which is our own money, we spend an average of $2 more per illegal, than we do on our own citizens. What f&cking sense does THAT make?

Since the i******s are good at self limiting their population, being able to maintain it at 11 million, it seems we could divert more resources to caring for our own folks. Let's try to reduce violent crime among citizens, you know, bring it down to at least 20:1 or something. Let's try to create more jobs, jobs Americans will actually show up for, and let i******s continue to enrich business people with cheap labor. Let's stop letting politicians use i******s as a scapegoats for their inability to solve real problems, and force them to do some real work. Let's see if we can create some jobs other than wall building, you know, some jobs that won't be taking money out of OUR pockets.

Of course, if hype and rhetoric could be bottled and sold, politicians would be rich............wait a minute............politicians ARE rich............I guess they DID bottle that crap after all - and WE bought it.
I've mentioned this statistic before, but here it ... (show quote)


Politicians are all rich. They all have way more than they should have according to their wages. Few are actually honest.
I******s....if they were truly sneaking in, we should have less than 100 here. But, they are just walking over the border, have no real feeling for the country and just TAKE as much as they can, with few exceptions. Most, not all, are truly bad for the country in every way. They have ALL broken the law by coming here that way so right away one has the right to deport them as criminals, as they should be.
They take jobs, put their f**g up over ours and send a great deal of the money they earn out of this country. They bring disease that has long ago been nearly erased from this country. They are not the scapegoats. Americans are.

Reply
Feb 22, 2017 11:00:17   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
lpnmajor wrote:
I've mentioned this statistic before, but here it is again; there are 11 million i*****l i*******ts. Personally, I object to calling them "immigrants", but that's another story. For this post, that magic number "11 million" is the focus. A respected Republican operative mentioned that number again last night. For at least 10 years in a row, there have been exactly 11 million i******s running around. How in the hell are they able to keep their numbers stable with i******s rushing across the border daily?

It isn't at all reasonable to assume that the 11 million people today, are the same 11 million that were here 10 years ago - unless we're deporting the same folks over and over, and no new folks make it across. The thing is, if this number has remained stable for a decade, why are we so damned concerned about it? It can't be crime, since the ratio of violent crimes committed by citizens to those committed by i******s is 34:1. We'd be trying to deport natural born Americans if crime was the motivation. It can't be jobs either, as very few ( if any ) i******s take jobs Americans would lower themselves to do. It isn't disease or threats of terrorists either, so what IS the reason we are so concerned about i******s, to the extent that we pay a higher priority to them at the rate of 100:1, with the "1" being Citizens?

The simple answer is: it's easier to solve a non problem, than it is to solve a real problem. That's great, for e******n purposes, but what then? What happens when all i******s are gone? How will politicians explain crime and jobless rates that don't change? Well, they'll simply blame it on another population that isn't the problem, and move the focus there. Out of a population of 320 million or so, we spend an inordinate amount of energy and treasure on these i******s, making them more important than our own citizens. Not counting Medicare and Social Security, which is our own money, we spend an average of $2 more per illegal, than we do on our own citizens. What f&cking sense does THAT make?

Since the i******s are good at self limiting their population, being able to maintain it at 11 million, it seems we could divert more resources to caring for our own folks. Let's try to reduce violent crime among citizens, you know, bring it down to at least 20:1 or something. Let's try to create more jobs, jobs Americans will actually show up for, and let i******s continue to enrich business people with cheap labor. Let's stop letting politicians use i******s as a scapegoats for their inability to solve real problems, and force them to do some real work. Let's see if we can create some jobs other than wall building, you know, some jobs that won't be taking money out of OUR pockets.

Of course, if hype and rhetoric could be bottled and sold, politicians would be rich............wait a minute............politicians ARE rich............I guess they DID bottle that crap after all - and WE bought it.
I've mentioned this statistic before, but here it ... (show quote)


The 11 million number is the "standard." The actual number of i******s in the US is more like 30 to 40 million. To reveal the t***h about this would cause significant repercussions even among the liberals. As the number grows, liberals in many areas will experience culture shock in their own neighborhoods, if the aren't already. It helps explain their bizarre behavior.

Reply
 
 
Feb 22, 2017 11:37:48   #
mongo Loc: TEXAS
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
The 11 million number is the "standard." The actual number of i******s in the US is more like 30 to 40 million. To reveal the t***h about this would cause significant repercussions even among the liberals. As the number grows, liberals in many areas will experience culture shock in their own neighborhoods, if the aren't already. It helps explain their bizarre behavior.


Stockholm Syndrome would explain most of their behavior as well!

SEMPER FI

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 09:54:30   #
Paybacktimeishere
 
Overlooked Phenomena

lpnmajor: 11 Million is A Joke!! Because No-
One Really Know's For Certain, With The Border
Being More Like A SEINE, Than A Deterrant!!!
Estimates Range As High As 23 Million ILLEGAL'S, That Have Entered This Country, Via
Multiple Method's, & With The Assistance Of
L*****T, Diversity Is Best, Anti-American, MORON'S!!!

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 16:35:27   #
jer48 Loc: perris ca
 
lpnmajor wrote:
I've mentioned this statistic before, but here it is again; there are 11 million i*****l i*******ts. Personally, I object to calling them "immigrants", but that's another story. For this post, that magic number "11 million" is the focus. A respected Republican operative mentioned that number again last night. For at least 10 years in a row, there have been exactly 11 million i******s running around. How in the hell are they able to keep their numbers stable with i******s rushing across the border daily?

It isn't at all reasonable to assume that the 11 million people today, are the same 11 million that were here 10 years ago - unless we're deporting the same folks over and over, and no new folks make it across. The thing is, if this number has remained stable for a decade, why are we so damned concerned about it? It can't be crime, since the ratio of violent crimes committed by citizens to those committed by i******s is 34:1. We'd be trying to deport natural born Americans if crime was the motivation. It can't be jobs either, as very few ( if any ) i******s take jobs Americans would lower themselves to do. It isn't disease or threats of terrorists either, so what IS the reason we are so concerned about i******s, to the extent that we pay a higher priority to them at the rate of 100:1, with the "1" being Citizens?

The simple answer is: it's easier to solve a non problem, than it is to solve a real problem. That's great, for e******n purposes, but what then? What happens when all i******s are gone? How will politicians explain crime and jobless rates that don't change? Well, they'll simply blame it on another population that isn't the problem, and move the focus there. Out of a population of 320 million or so, we spend an inordinate amount of energy and treasure on these i******s, making them more important than our own citizens. Not counting Medicare and Social Security, which is our own money, we spend an average of $2 more per illegal, than we do on our own citizens. What f&cking sense does THAT make?

Since the i******s are good at self limiting their population, being able to maintain it at 11 million, it seems we could divert more resources to caring for our own folks. Let's try to reduce violent crime among citizens, you know, bring it down to at least 20:1 or something. Let's try to create more jobs, jobs Americans will actually show up for, and let i******s continue to enrich business people with cheap labor. Let's stop letting politicians use i******s as a scapegoats for their inability to solve real problems, and force them to do some real work. Let's see if we can create some jobs other than wall building, you know, some jobs that won't be taking money out of OUR pockets.

Of course, if hype and rhetoric could be bottled and sold, politicians would be rich............wait a minute............politicians ARE rich............I guess they DID bottle that crap after all - and WE bought it.
I've mentioned this statistic before, but here it ... (show quote)


your a fken i***t I don't know where you live but here in So. Ca. the i******s have taken most of the construction jobs and fail to play by the same rules as Ca. contractors so before you shoot your mouth off find out what your talking about not to mention their quality of work is way below par

Reply
Feb 23, 2017 18:48:40   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
jer48 wrote:
your a fken i***t I don't know where you live but here in So. Ca. the i******s have taken most of the construction jobs and fail to play by the same rules as Ca. contractors so before you shoot your mouth off find out what your talking about not to mention their quality of work is way below par


Hope your not in the part that's flooding looks bad.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.