oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

This list may not contain all of them but it sure lists plenty of them to call for impeachment. There are so many examples of him running around the Constitution that only blind supporters of The One could ever try to support him and call him anything other than a liar.

"Perhaps it was commentator Andrew C. McCarthy who best summed it up by saying, “Absent the political will to remove the president, he will remain president no matter how many high crimes and misdemeanors he stacks up…and absent the removal of the president, the United States will be fundamentally t***sformed.”

In discussing Obama and his end runs around the Constitution and laws of Congress, Representative Curt Gowdy (R) SC says:

''Gowdy likens this to v**er ID. If a statute says you have to provide two forms of ID, can Obama require one—or even three? Or maybe he can suspend all requirements, Gowdy wonders. “If you can turn off certain categories of law, do you not also have the power to turn off all categories of law?”

If you think about what Gowdy said surely you can see that if a President can do those things he has become a dictator.

http://www.teaparty.org/general-calls-massive-march-washington-32476/

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

I put the list right on here, democrats are lazy!


LIE: He promised no lobbyists would work in his administration.
LIE: He committed to slash earmarks.
LIE: He promised to be the most t***sparent presidency in history.
LIE: He promised to put an end to “phony accounting.”
LIE: He promised to restore trust in government.
LIE: He pledged to seek public financing in the general e******n.
LIE: He promised to treat super-PACS as a “threat to democracy.”
LIE: He pledged to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent.
LIE: He promised to create five million new energy jobs alone. (Note: The total number of jobs created in Obama’s first term was roughly one-tenth that figure.)
LIE: He promised to create “shovel-ready’ jobs.
LIE: He promised to lift two million Americans from poverty. (Note: A record 46 million Americans are now living in poverty during the Obama era.)
LIE: He promised to slash health care premiums by $2,500 for the typical family … allow Americans to keep their health care coverage if they liked it … refuse to fund a******n via the Affordable Care Act … respect religious liberties … and insisted that the mandate to buy insurance, enforced by financial penalties, was not a tax.
LIE: He pledged to stop the rise of oceans.
LIE: He promised to “remake the world” and “heal the planet.”
LIE: He promised to punish Syria if it crossed the “red line” of using chemical weapons
LIE: He assured us that as president “I don’t bluff.”
LIE: He trumpeted the Russian reset. (Note: Tensions between Russia and the US are increasing and examples of Russia undermining U.S. interests are multiplying.)
LIE: He promised to bring us together (Note: He is the most polarizing president in the history of the Gallup poll.)
LIE: He promised to put an end to politics that “breeds division and conflict and cynicism.”
LIE: He counseled us to “resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long.”

Winter Solstice Loc: Salt Lake City

Yes, as Andrew McCarthy said in part here, "and absent the removal of the president, the United States will be fundamentally t***sformed.” Indeed, These United States have been t***sformed. Obama has become a dictator completely above the law. I guess we can now call the U.S.A. a dictatorship. I am not the least bit happy about that.

Donmac Loc: Lincoln, RI

Intelligent people are still "awed" by him. His charismatic personality seems to make dim wits out of them. A real puzzle.
It is easy to understand the mass of "gimme, gimme" people, but not those who know better.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

....more simply stated: whenever he opens his mouth.

Babsan

Obama is a LIE from day#1 to date.Impossible to count and the stupid v**ers are to blame.He is what he has always been a FRAUD and a LIE

deb_bus Loc: fort worth and wichita falls tx, and houston

He has lived a lie ever since he was born.

Loki Loc: Georgia

The lies are reprehensible, and despicable, but unfortunately, not impeachable.

Winter Solstice Loc: Salt Lake City

People who listen to the sound of his voice and not the content and t***h are not intelligent.

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

In the United States, impeachment can occur both at the federal and state level. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may be impeached and removed only for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors".[9] Several commentators have suggested that Congress alone may decide for itself what constitutes a "high crime or misdemeanour", especially since Nixon v. United States stated that the Supreme Court did not have the authority to determine whether the Senate properly "tried" a defendant.[citation needed] In 1970, then-House Minority Leader Gerald R. Ford defined the criterion as he saw it: "An impeachable offense is wh**ever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history."[10] Four years later, Gerald Ford would become president when President Richard Nixon resigned under the threat of impeachment.
Officials subject to impeachment

The central question regarding the Constitutional dispute about the impeachment of members of the legislature is whether members of Congress are officers of the United States. The Constitution grants the House the power to impeach "The President, the Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States." [9] It has been suggested that members of Congress are not officers of the United States.[11] Others, however, believe that members are civil officers and are subject to impeachment.[citation needed]

The House of Representatives did impeach a senator once:[12] Senator William Blount, in 1798. The Senate expelled Senator Blount and, after initially hearing his impeachment, dismissed the charges for lack of jurisdiction.[13] Left unsettled was the question whether members of Congress were civil officers of the United States. The House has not impeached a Member of Congress since Blount. As each House has the authority to expel its own members without involving the other chamber, expulsion has been the method used for removing Members of Congress.

Jefferson's Manual, which is integral to the Rules of the House of Representatives,[14] states that impeachment is set in motion by charges made on the floor, charges preferred by a memorial, a member's resolution referred to a committee, a message from the president, charges t***smitted from the legislature of a state or territory or from a grand jury, or from facts developed and reported by an investigating committee of the House. It further states that a proposition to impeach is a question of high privilege in the House and at once supersedes business otherwise in order under the rules governing the order of business.
Process

At the federal level, the impeachment process is a two-step procedure. The House of Representatives must first pass, by a simple majority of those present and v****g, articles of impeachment, which constitute the formal allegation or allegations. Upon passage, the defendant has been "impeached". Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a president, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. For the impeachment of any other official, the Constitution is silent on who shall preside, suggesting that this role falls to the Senate's usual presiding officer. This may include the impeachment of the vice president, although legal theories suggest that allowing a defendant to be the judge in his own case would be a blatant conflict of interest. If the Vice President did not preside over an impeachment (of anyone besides the President), the duties would fall to the President pro tempore of the Senate.

To convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the senators present is required. Conviction removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may v**e to further punish the individual by barring him from holding future federal office, elected or appointed. Conviction by the Senate does not bar criminal prosecution. Even after an accused has left office, it is possible to disqualify the person from future office or from certain emoluments of his prior office (such as a pension). If there is no charge for which a two-thirds majority of the senators present v**e "guilty", the defendant is acquitted and no punishment is imposed.

TroubleshooterTim Loc: People's Republic of Oregon

Wow, when you said you were going to list them, I expected your post to take up a couple pages.

MrEd Loc: Georgia

It would if he listed them all. These are just the main highlights, not all of the lies. I would h**e to see what it would take to list them all, since he lies every time he opens his mouth...........

TroubleshooterTim Loc: People's Republic of Oregon

Here is a list I found online...
http://obamalies.net/list-of-lies

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

The lies have been told and then actions that violated them and the Constitution have been performed. Can you accept this list of impeachable things he has done?


The NSA Debacle

IRS Persecution of Conservatives and Tea Party Groups

Obamacare

Amnesty

Fast and Furious

B******i

The Silencing of Journalists and Bloggers and the Use of the Lapdog Media as a Propaganda Tool Worthy of Goebbels

Printing Money and The National Debt

Consorting with Known Terrorists and Enabling Terrorist Activities


Bringing Foreign Entities into Our Intelligence and Scientific Agencies

Union Collaboration

Enabling and Promoting Marxist/C*******t Entities

E******n F***d

Inciting Racial Unrest

P**********l Excess – Vacations, Parties, etc.

Violating Every Aspect of the US Constitution

Responsibility to Protect
The Gutting and Marginalizing of Our Military

The Mistreatment of Allies, Especially Israel

The Redistribution of Wealth

The Gutting and Marginalizing of Our Intelligence Agencies

Religious Persecution of Christians

Unconstitutional Laws Against the 2nd Amendment

Unconstitutional Search and Seizures

Taxation Without Representation

Committing Unauthorized Acts of War

Manipulation of the Financial Markets

I would say that any of these actions are impeachable other than the vacations and parties but these could be included since the people invited to any of them prods more violent feelings among his political enemies.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Some of the actions are, I think, impeachable. The actions are, the lies about them are not. What he did, not what he said he did.