Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated g****l w*****g data
Feb 6, 2017 15:09:28 #
The UK's Daily Mail ran an article on February 5 with the above title. These are the bullet points of the article:
* The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated g****l w*****g
* It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on c*****e c****e
* America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
* The report claimed the pause in g****l w*****g never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data
The crux of the story is as follows. "A high-level whistleblower (Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist) has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015."
This emerging scandal "has disturbing echoes of the ‘Climategate’ affair which broke shortly before the UN climate summit in 2009, when the leak of thousands of emails between climate scientists suggested they had manipulated and hidden data. Some were British experts at the influential Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia."
The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in g****l w*****g in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.
You can read the entire article here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html
This is just another example of scientific data being manipulated for political and monetary purposes which was discussed in a previous post here: http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-91283-1.html
It really makes you wonder about the motivations of the g****l w*****g alarmists and the fact that they need to fudge the data and lie to the public, which is all to willing to accept the pronouncements of these so called "environmental experts".
Why is the media so quick and willing to accept the claims of these alarmists. Why do you not hear about the 143 Climate Scientists that take a contrary view on the issue of G****l W*****g? http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=289
Here is their "Mission Statement"
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous g****l w*****g."
* The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated g****l w*****g
* It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on c*****e c****e
* America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
* The report claimed the pause in g****l w*****g never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data
The crux of the story is as follows. "A high-level whistleblower (Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist) has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015."
This emerging scandal "has disturbing echoes of the ‘Climategate’ affair which broke shortly before the UN climate summit in 2009, when the leak of thousands of emails between climate scientists suggested they had manipulated and hidden data. Some were British experts at the influential Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia."
The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in g****l w*****g in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.
You can read the entire article here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html
This is just another example of scientific data being manipulated for political and monetary purposes which was discussed in a previous post here: http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-91283-1.html
It really makes you wonder about the motivations of the g****l w*****g alarmists and the fact that they need to fudge the data and lie to the public, which is all to willing to accept the pronouncements of these so called "environmental experts".
Why is the media so quick and willing to accept the claims of these alarmists. Why do you not hear about the 143 Climate Scientists that take a contrary view on the issue of G****l W*****g? http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=289
Here is their "Mission Statement"
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous g****l w*****g."
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.