kankune Loc: Iowa

Hmmm...the so called judge that placed a restraining order on President Trump's executive order does pro Bono work for i*****l i*******ts and loves black l***s m****r. Once again...politics before the safety of American Citizens. Man, it's getting to the point of down right sickening !!! Geeze....just makes you want to kick somebody's ass all over the place!!! Thank God for the Super Bowl tomorrow. Give us all a break from this crazy madness!!

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

While I am not surprised that this is his background, do you have a source for this information?

kankune Loc: Iowa

My friend from Texas. I can ask him where he got it....

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

I think I found the source, and it is what I consider a reliable, honest source

WND Exclusive
That travel-ban lifting judge said what?
Claimed in courtroom none arrested from 7 designated countries since 9/11

Judge James Robart

WASHINGTON – The judge who issued a stay on President Trump’s executive order temporarily barring entry to the U.S. by those from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Libya and Somalia erroneously claimed in his courtroom that no person from those countries have been arrested in the U.S. since 9/11.

In a courtroom exchange Friday with Department of Justice lawyer Michelle Bennett, federal Judge James L. Robart, asked, “How many arrests have there been of foreign nationals from those seven countries since 9/11”?

“I don’t know the specific details of attacks or planned attacks,” said Bennett, who is from the Department of Justice’s Civil Division.

“The answer to that is none, as best I can tell,” said the judge.

While Robart was clearly wrong – travelers and immigrants from the seven countries have indeed been involved in the murders of Americans and other heinous crimes – a better answer would have been: No one knows just how many have been arrested because no one has been counting mere arrests.

America is headed down a suicidal path – but it’s a subtle invasion. Get all the details in Leo Hohmann’s brand new book “Stealth Invasion: Muslim Conquest Through Immigration and Resettlement Jihad,” available now at the WND Superstore.

Here is a partial list of some of the more well-known cases involving persons who traveled from countries on the watchlist:

In October 2009, police arrested an Iraqi Muslim immigrant for running over his 20-year-old daughter to punish her for becoming “too westernized.” His daughter, died of her injuries. The father was sentenced to 34 years in prison.

In November 2009, Nidal Hassan fatally shot fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others at Fort Hood in Texas. While the Army major was an American, he received counseling and encouragement from Yemen-based imam Anwar al-Awlaki, who traveled frequently to the U.S. and was later k**led in a drone attack ordered by Barack Obama in Yemen.

In 2011, Rahim Alfetlawi, 47, an Iraqi native living in Minneapolis, shot his step-daughter fatally in the head because she moved away and was becoming to westernized. He was sentenced to life in prison.

On Sept. 17, 2016, Dahir Ahmed Adan, born in Somalia, entered a mall in St. Cloud, Minnesota, dressed as a security guard and began stabbing individuals before an off-duty copy shot and k**led him. According to police, Adan asked at least one person if they were a Muslim before attacking them and made statements regarding Allah during the attack. Ten were injured in the stabbing spree, but thankfully none were k**led or suffered grave injuries.

In November 2017, Somali refugee Abdul Razak Ali Artan attacked 11 Americans with a knife and then a car on the campus of Ohio State University in Columbus before a campus police officer shot and k**led him.

But terrorism experts are scratching their heads trying to figure out the judge’s point.

The Trump administration chose the seven countries for the watch list because they were designated as essentially lawless nations by the Obama administration – those from which terrorists are known to be traveling to evade identification.

Trump’s executive order made this clear: “Numerous foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001, including foreign nationals who entered the United States after receiving visitor, student, or employment visas, or who entered through the United States refugee-resettlement program. Deteriorating conditions in certain countries due to war, strife, disaster and civil unrest increase the likelihood that terrorists will use any means possible to enter the United States. The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism.”

In addition, if you look at the volume of major terrorist attacks and gruesome crimes in the U.S. committed by Muslims from other countries besides the seven, there will indeed be many, many more. Does that suggest the judge wants to see a broader watch list than Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan and Somalia?

Others who used these destinations to wreak havoc on Europe over the last two years, where hundreds have been k**led in bombings, truck attacks, shootings and stabbings following the continent’s opening to “Syrian refugees,” are, in fact, mostly unknown young men from Muslim countries the world over.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!

On Saturday, Trump said on Twitter: “What is our country coming to when a judge can halt a Homeland Security travel ban and anyone, even with bad intentions, can come into U.S.?” He added that “very bad and dangerous” people may now come into the U.S. because of the judge’s “terrible” ruling.

Earlier, Trump called the judge who issued the temporary restraining order a “so-called judge” and vowed that the order would be “overturned!”

The halt late Friday was issued by U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle, who is an appointee of George W. Bush. He said that Washington state and Minnesota had standing to challenge Trump’s executive order on immigration. So he issued the temporary, nationwide restraining order based on his opinion that the states showed their case is likely to succeed.

Ed Straker, an attorney wo attended law school with Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, says Judge Robart “has clearly usurped his authority.”

“The case clearly has no plaintiffs with standing or any kind of validity,” he wrote in American Thinker. “At most, Judge Robart should have stayed his decision pending appeal to circuit courts. His radical injunction smacks of a judicial c**p, of a single federal district judge asserting his authority over the entire executive branch. His arguments for doing so are unconstitutional, as is his manner of issuing the order. We are living in a time when judicial ayatollahs are usurping the power of our elected officials, and it is very much like a judicial c**p.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/that-travel-ban-lifting-judge-said-what/#h78JoeK4qzbDRFPE.99

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

During Robart’s confirmation hearing, Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch, of Utah, praised the judge for his pro bono legal work, noting he’d represented a number of refugees over the course of his decades-long career, according to CNN. I do not know if he is directed connected to B*M, but do you recall his ruling on the police force.... from the bench he made the remark: "Black l***s m****r" shortly after he cited statistics. He also accused the Seattle police union of trying to hold the community “hostage” by tying compensation to police services guaranteed to people by the U.S. Constitution.

kankune Loc: Iowa

Thank you, Prop. U got to it quicker than I did. : )

Dr.Dross

Let me see if I have this straight. You are attempting to impugn the judge's character or cast doubt on his decision because he gives freely of his time, energy, and expertise to help the least of these and disenfranchised? Devastating indictment. Law is not politics before the safety of American Citizens. If his interpretation of the law is wrong, go after that not the person. Why do you guys do this sort of stuff? We are proud to say we are "a nation of laws," laws that we honor sometimes at great inconvenience and mortal risk. Freedom is dangerous, but the alternative is intolerable. No matter that the risk of anyone from these countries harming an American Citizen is close to zilch, that argument only works if this judge is right about the law. Be decent and honorable in addressing this situation. Attacking the judge instead of objectively looking at the law is the worst form of American politics.

kankune Loc: Iowa

Dr....unless this judge gets intelligence briefings every morning like the President does, then no he should not be interfering with an executive order. I also think he has a conflict of interest. And u said: no matter that the risk of anyone from those countries is close to zilch. So Doc....do you PROMISE me...put your hand on your heart and PROMISE me that no one from one of those countries is going to come here and harm or k**l someone. Once again....PROMISE me!!!

Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State

It was on King5 Seattle News

Dr.Dross

WND is hardly a reliable and honest source, having an endless amount of stories thoroughly debunked and gaining the earned nomenclature among journalists of the WorldNutDaily. But of no matter. Let's take it as utterly true. What is the article doing? Read it and try to guess. Fear- and h**e-mongering for specifically Muslims. The argument the article is making the case that it is a religion ban. But you will not see that point. When the fearsome secularists and atheists population increases to a majority in the future, Christians will be next as a threat to society. When you start making exceptions to the first amendment's religious freedom clause, turn your backs on American ideals out of fear, and become proud of your intolerance, America is doomed.

Nuclearian Loc: I live in a Fascist, Liberal State

Well if you knew the law, then you know it will be successfully appealed because Congress gave the President the right to do what he did. Thus it is Constitutional.

Attacking the Judge IS correct in this instance. He doesnt know the law, and shouldnt be practicing it.

Dr.Dross

Kankune, I suggest you keep up with the news. Trump has refused intelligence briefings before e******n and after. Google it. But that is not the point. The law is not a situational ethic. If it is unconstitutional end of story or put the document in mothballs. There is the same risk of harm from any country. Italy, the Mafia. Same of Russia. This Muslim ban is to Islam what the poster "America Wants you" was to Americans. Uncle Sam turned into a modern day Crusader against their religion. An ISIS recruitment strategy. Fear, like you have and many others express here, is what incites policies and situations that only increase the threat. Then you double down and the Constitution and rights get put in a closet until, as you will insist, the crisis is over. Which is much like the toll bridges and roads that were only meant to be there until the cost of construction was covered. Are they gone?

You and everyone here are more favorable to fear than to liberty. Sorry, that is harsh but what I see as the crux.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I can not wait to hear the screams and chants based on the new directive to fast track the more than 500,000 deportation hearing. The Trump administration released a memorandum this week–effective immediately–which orders the Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review (which manages the immigration courts) to prioritize deportation hearings for certain groups, including any non-citizens who are detained and unaccompanied children who do not have a sponsor. The memo rescinded preexisting immigration court priorities from early 2016 and 2015 that included all other unaccompanied children, families released from custody, and other recent border crossers.

The new court docket memo also directs the immigration courts to prioritize deportation hearings for non-citizens who are in detention. Right now, that number stands around 40,000.

All I can say..... GOOD and GO TRUMP! If you support him in his efforts, let him and your representative know! You can do it on-line at https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact#page

Dr.Dross

It was an executive order. Congress had nothing to do with it.

A personal attack on the judge is NOT correct; the law is what is in question. He could be a serial k**ler and still get the law right. Admonishing or condemning him for freely helping others in need is, I will be polite, just plain wrong.

Dr.Dross

Why attempt to disparage him (in this crazy down the rabbit hole attempt only the Right sees as pertinent) instead of just focus on the law? The fact he is charitable is a sin? A mark against him?