One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
You always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart.
Jan 9, 2017 18:18:11   #
PeterS
 
"You always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart", so said Kellyanne in her latest defense of her boss. I wonder if she ever stopped to consider that perhaps what comes out of his mouth is exactly what he has in his heart? Think about it Kellyanne, think about it....

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/conway-look-trumps-heart-not-whats-come-out-his-mouth?cid=sm_fb_maddow

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 18:35:51   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
PeterS wrote:
"You always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart", so said Kellyanne in her latest defense of her boss. I wonder if she ever stopped to consider that perhaps what comes out of his mouth is exactly what he has in his heart? Think about it Kellyanne, think about it....

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/conway-look-trumps-heart-not-whats-come-out-his-mouth?cid=sm_fb_maddow

And what comes out of your mouth is what you have in your heart Pete...pure unadulterated bulls**t!

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 18:41:48   #
timofrock
 
PeterS wrote:
"You always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart", so said Kellyanne in her latest defense of her boss. I wonder if she ever stopped to consider that perhaps what comes out of his mouth is exactly what he has in his heart? Think about it Kellyanne, think about it....

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/conway-look-trumps-heart-not-whats-come-out-his-mouth?cid=sm_fb_maddow


😭 Dweeb

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2017 18:48:25   #
PeterS
 
mwdegutis wrote:
And what comes out of your mouth is what you have in your heart Pete...pure unadulterated bulls**t!

Why don't you address the topic instead of attacking the messenger MW? If the only thing you can defend your man with is fallacies then just what is it you think you are trying to defend?

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 19:29:43   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
PeterS wrote:
Why don't you address the topic instead of attacking the messenger MW? If the only thing you can defend your man with is fallacies then just what is it you think you are trying to defend?


Ahh pete ,, hey Pete ,, seems as though your post is asking the question to Kellyann and I do not think she will be addressing your dribble ,, just saying !!! Dumbass !!

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 19:46:39   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
I will second that.
mwdegutis wrote:
And what comes out of your mouth is what you have in your heart Pete...pure unadulterated bulls**t!

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 19:51:40   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
"You always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart", so said Kellyanne in her latest defense of her boss. I wonder if she ever stopped to consider that perhaps what comes out of his mouth is exactly what he has in his heart? Think about it Kellyanne, think about it....

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/conway-look-trumps-heart-not-whats-come-out-his-mouth?cid=sm_fb_maddow


How about this that came out of his mouth about doing away with lobbyist in and around the White House, and anyone leaving the White House can be a lobbyist for 5 yrs...

It's a start at keeping his word, yes??
And let's see what happens to those active lobbyist after Jan. 20th, right??

In a stunning change of pace, each lobbyist that was previously invited to the t***sition team were buffed out Tuesday evening.

The Wall Street Journal reports that:
Vice President-elect Mike Pence formally signed documents that put him in charge of the t***sition team, and officials insisted the 10-week effort to build an administration is on schedule. In one of his first moves, Mr. Pence ordered the removal of all lobbyists from the t***sition team, said one t***sition team member with knowledge of the decisions.

Why isn’t this bigger news? Donald Trump and Mike Pence are absolutely practicing what they preach. It is a long-standing tradition on the Hill that for better or worse, lobbyists deserve to run your platform. However, the Trump team are following through with their promise to ‘Drain The Swamp’ by cutting these men out.

Mike Rogers, the former National Security Senior Advisor to the Trump t***sition team who was abruptly cut out last night, posted his resignation statement on his website:

It was a privilege to prepare and advise the policy, personnel and agency action teams on all aspects of the national security portfolio during the initial pre-e******n planning phase. Our work will provide a strong foundation for the new t***sition team leadership as they move into the post-e******n phase, which naturally is incorporating the campaign team in New York who drove President-elect Trump to an incredible victory last Tuesday.

Mike Rogers, among others, did not align with the mission statement of the Trump team to ‘Drain The Swamp.’ Sources report that every single person brought in by Chris Christie was being ousted, perhaps a strategy that was used to identify and rid the team of political insiders and lobbyists. Gone now are the members of his t***sition team with ties to Wall Street firms and other corporations.

If the Trump team is truly to ‘Drain The Swamp’ on the Hill, this was clearly the first painful step that they must take to get there.

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2017 20:09:57   #
solarkin
 
jimahrens wrote:
I will second that.


Ayye Matey,
D**g the scallywag by the scupboards.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 20:10:43   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
lindajoy wrote:
How about this that came out of his mouth about doing away with lobbyist in and around the White House, and anyone leaving the White House can be a lobbyist for 5 yrs...

It's a start at keeping his word, yes??
And let's see what happens to those active lobbyist after Jan. 20th, right??

In a stunning change of pace, each lobbyist that was previously invited to the t***sition team were buffed out Tuesday evening.

The Wall Street Journal reports that:
Vice President-elect Mike Pence formally signed documents that put him in charge of the t***sition team, and officials insisted the 10-week effort to build an administration is on schedule. In one of his first moves, Mr. Pence ordered the removal of all lobbyists from the t***sition team, said one t***sition team member with knowledge of the decisions.

Why isn’t this bigger news? Donald Trump and Mike Pence are absolutely practicing what they preach. It is a long-standing tradition on the Hill that for better or worse, lobbyists deserve to run your platform. However, the Trump team are following through with their promise to ‘Drain The Swamp’ by cutting these men out.

Mike Rogers, the former National Security Senior Advisor to the Trump t***sition team who was abruptly cut out last night, posted his resignation statement on his website:

It was a privilege to prepare and advise the policy, personnel and agency action teams on all aspects of the national security portfolio during the initial pre-e******n planning phase. Our work will provide a strong foundation for the new t***sition team leadership as they move into the post-e******n phase, which naturally is incorporating the campaign team in New York who drove President-elect Trump to an incredible victory last Tuesday.

Mike Rogers, among others, did not align with the mission statement of the Trump team to ‘Drain The Swamp.’ Sources report that every single person brought in by Chris Christie was being ousted, perhaps a strategy that was used to identify and rid the team of political insiders and lobbyists. Gone now are the members of his t***sition team with ties to Wall Street firms and other corporations.

If the Trump team is truly to ‘Drain The Swamp’ on the Hill, this was clearly the first painful step that they must take to get there.
How about this that came out of his mouth about do... (show quote)




Linda-despite what Pete and his cohorts say, we do not have to defend our guy. He won !!! Since they are unable to defend their corrupt candidates' losing, they are trying to pin the blame on any and everyone they can think of including the f**e Russian report the authenticity of which was verified by 3 agencies with two citing that they are almost sure and the other issuing a definite maybe. It will be difficult for them to survive without PC and business as usual. You are correct, DTS !!! Good Luck America !!~!

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 20:25:53   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Ricko wrote:
Linda-despite what Pete and his cohorts say, we do not have to defend our guy. He won !!! Since they are unable to defend their corrupt candidates' losing, they are trying to pin the blame on any and everyone they can think of including the f**e Russian report the authenticity of which was verified by 3 agencies with two citing that they are almost sure and the other issuing a definite maybe. It will be difficult for them to survive without PC and business as usual. You are correct, DTS !!! Good Luck America !!~!
Linda-despite what Pete and his cohorts say, we do... (show quote)


So correct you are Rick...My post was more along the lines of "you just may wish to believe what comes out of his mouth"....

Trump needs no defending is accurate!! He has already started to drain the swamp and is already out that starting gate leading...

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 20:31:15   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
BTW~~ here's another that reads like a Spy novel in the making...~~

Sorry for its length but is needed as you will see...

Appears the hackers into the DNC is none other than OBAMA'S man...
Truly sad what goes on in this corrupt political arena... They make us the laughing stock of the world, tripping over own feet while what it boils down to is pointing fingers at our very own..As we have known all along...

Enjoy, I got it in an email...~~
Russians did not hack the DNC system, a Russian named Dmitri Alperovitch is the hacker and he works for President Obama. In the last five years the Obama administration has turned exclusively to one Russian to solve every major cyber-attack in America, whether the attack was on the U. S. government or a corporation. Only one “super-hero cyber-warrior” seems to “have the codes” to figure out “if” a system was hacked and by “whom.”

Dmitri’s company, CrowdStrike has been called in by Obama to solve mysterious attacks on many high level government agencies and American corporations, including: German Bundestag, Democratic National Committee, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), the White House, the State Department, SONY, and many others.

CrowdStrike’s philosophy is: “You don’t have a malware problem; you have an adversary problem.”

CrowdStrike has played a critical role in the development of America’s cyber-defense policy. Dmitri Alperovitch and George Kurtz, a former head of the FBI cyberwarfare unit founded CrowdStrike. Shawn Henry, former executive assistant director at the FBI is now CrowdStrike’s president of services. The company is crawling with former U. S. intelligence agents.

Before Alperovitch founded CrowdStrike in 2011, he was working in Atlanta as the chief threat officer at the antiv***s software firm McAfee, owned by Intel (a DARPA company). During that time, he “discovered” the Chinese had c*********d at least seventy-one companies and organizations, including thirteen defense contractors, three electronics firms, and the International Olympic Committee. He was the only person to notice the biggest cyberattack in history! Nothing suspicious about that.

Alperovitch And The DNC

After CrowdStrike was hired as an independent “vendor” by the DNC to investigate a possible cyber-attack on their system, Alperovitch sent the DNC a proprietary software package called Falcon that monitors the networks of its clients in real time. According to Alperovitch, Falcon “lit up,” within ten seconds of being installed at the DNC. Alperovitch had his “proof” in TEN SECONDS that Russia was in the network. This “alleged” evidence of Russian hacking has yet to be shared with anyone.
As Donald Trump has pointed out, the FBI, the agency that should have been immediately involved in hacking that effects “National Security,” has yet to even examine the DNC system to begin an investigation. Instead, the FBI and 16 other U. S. “intelligence” agencies simply “agree” with Obama’s most trusted “cyber-warfare” expert Dmitri Alperovitch’s “TEN SECOND” assessment that produced no evidence to support the claim.

Also remember that it is only Alperovitch and CrowdStrike that claim to have evidence that it was Russian hackers. In fact, only two hackers were found to have been in the system and were both identified by Alperovitch as Russian FSB (CIA) and the Russian GRU (DoD). It is only Alperovitch who claims that he knows that it is Putin behind these two hackers.

Alperovitch failed to mention in his conclusive “TEN SECOND” assessment that Guccifer 2.0 had already hacked the DNC and made available to the public the documents he hacked – before Alperovitch did his ten second assessment. Alperovitch reported that no other hackers were found, ignoring the fact that Guccifer 2.0 had already hacked and released DNC documents to the public. Alperovitch’s assessment also goes directly against Julian Assange’s repeated statements that the DNC leaks did not come from the Russians.

The ridiculously f**e cyber-attack assessment done by Alperovitch and CrowdStrike naïvely flies in the face of the fact that a DNC insider admitted that he had released the DNC documents. Julian Assange implied in an interview that the murdered Democratic National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, was the source of a trove of damaging emails the website posted just days before the party’s convention. Seth was on his way to testify about the DNC leaks to the FBI when he was shot dead in the street.

It is also absurd to hear Alperovitch state that the Russian FSB (equivalent to the CIA) had been monitoring the DNC site for over a year and had done nothing. No attack, no theft, and no harm was done to the system by this “false-f**g cyber-attack” on the DNC – or at least, Alperovitch “reported” there was an attack. The second hacker, the supposed Russian military (GRU – like the U. S. DoD) hacker, had just entered the system two weeks before and also had done “nothing” but observe.

It is only Alperovitch’s word that reports that the Russian FSB was “looking for files on Donald Trump.” It is only this false claim that spuriously ties Trump to the “alleged” attack. It is also only Alperovitch who believes that this hack that was supposedly “looking for Trump files” was an attempt to “influence” the e******n. No files were found about Trump by the second hacker, as we know from Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0’s leaks. To confabulate that “Russian’s hacked the DNC to influence the e******ns” is the claim of one well-known Russian spy. Then, 17 U. S. intelligence agencies unanimously confirm that Alperovitch is correct – even though there is no evidence and no investigation was ever conducted.

How does Dmitri Alperovitch have such power? Why did Obama again and again use Alperovitch’s company, CrowdStrike, when they have miserably failed to stop further cyber-attacks on the systems they were hired to protect? Why should anyone believe CrowdStrikes false-f**g report?

After documents from the DNC continued to leak, and Guccifer 2.0 and Wikileaks made CrowdStrike’s report look foolish, Alperovitch decided the situation was far worse than he had reported. He single-handedly concluded that the Russians were conducting an “influence operation” to help win the e******n for Trump. This false assertion had absolutely no evidence to back it up.

On July 22, three days before the Democratic convention in Philadelphia, WikiLeaks dumped a massive cache of emails that had been “stolen” (not hacked) from the DNC. Reporters soon found emails suggesting that the DNC leadership had favored Hillary Clinton in her primary race against Bernie Sanders, which led Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the DNC chair, along with three other officials, to resign.

Just days later, it was discovered that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) had been hacked. CrowdStrike was called in again and once again, Alperovitch immediately “believed” that Russia was responsible. A lawyer for the DCCC gave Alperovitch permission to confirm the leak and to name Russia as the suspected author. Two weeks later, files from the DCCC began to appear on Guccifer 2.0’s website. This time Guccifer released information about Democratic congressional candidates who were running close races in Florida, Ohio, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. On August 12, Guccifer went further, publishing a spreadsheet that included the personal email addresses and phone numbers of nearly two hundred Democratic members of Congress.

Once again, Guccifer 2.0 proved Alperovitch and CrowdStrike’s claime to be grossly incorrect about the hack originating from Russia, with Putin masterminding it all. Nancy Pelosi offered members of Congress Alperovitch’s suggestion of installing Falcon, the system that failed to stop cyberattacks at the DNC, on all congressional laptops.

Key Point: Once Falcon was installed on the computers of members of the U. S. Congress, CrowdStike had even further full access into U. S. government accounts.

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2017 20:33:40   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
PeterS wrote:
Why don't you address the topic instead of attacking the messenger MW? If the only thing you can defend your man with is fallacies then just what is it you think you are trying to defend?

I'm not defending anything. I just mentioned that your heart is full of and your mouth spews out nothing but unadulterated bulls**t.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 21:50:13   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
"You always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart", so said Kellyanne in her latest defense of her boss. I wonder if she ever stopped to consider that perhaps what comes out of his mouth is exactly what he has in his heart? Think about it Kellyanne, think about it....

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/conway-look-trumps-heart-not-whats-come-out-his-mouth?cid=sm_fb_maddow


I don't claim to know any man's heart. But if we are going by what comes out of their mouth, I would say that your heart is chock full of h**e for those who disagree with you politically, or any other way. I pity your wife.

Reply
Jan 10, 2017 01:11:03   #
kenjay Loc: Arkansas
 
PeterS wrote:
"You always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart", so said Kellyanne in her latest defense of her boss. I wonder if she ever stopped to consider that perhaps what comes out of his mouth is exactly what he has in his heart? Think about it Kellyanne, think about it....

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/conway-look-trumps-heart-not-whats-come-out-his-mouth?cid=sm_fb_maddow

Maybe what comes out of your mouth is Obozo's peter and we know your heart was in it dumb ass.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.