"The American propaganda machine is in full gear with the flimsy accusation that Russia is responsible for the DNC hack. Instead of just accepting the narrative of blatant warmongers, why not walk through the evidence with John McAfee – cybersecurity expert."
http://libertycrier.com/russia-not-hack-dnc-john-mcafee-lays/
Larry the Legend wrote:
"The American propaganda machine is in full gear with the flimsy accusation that Russia is responsible for the DNC hack. Instead of just accepting the narrative of blatant warmongers, why not walk through the evidence with John McAfee – cybersecurity expert."
http://libertycrier.com/russia-not-hack-dnc-john-mcafee-lays/It may, or may not have been hacked by the Russians, but I sure as hell wouldn't believe anything John McAfee says....that guy is a real nut case.
Rivers wrote:
It may, or may not have been hacked by the Russians, but I sure as hell wouldn't believe anything John McAfee says....that guy is a real nut case.
John McAfee:
"John David McAfee is a British-American computer programmer and businessman. He founded the software company McAfee Associates in 1987 and ran it until 1994, when he resigned from the company.
McAfee Associates achieved early success as the creators of McAfee, the first commercial antiv***s software, and they now produce an entire line of enterprise security software. The company was renamed to Intel Security in 2011 after being purchased by Intel, though the software still retains the McAfee brand name. McAfee's wealth peaked in 2007 at $100 million, before his investments suffered in the global financial crisis that began that year."
You mean
that John McAfee? The one who actually
invented cyber-security, and showed everyone else how it's done? I'll take his word for it anytime over some mysterious 'anonymous source'.
Larry the Legend wrote:
John McAfee:
"John David McAfee is a British-American computer programmer and businessman. He founded the software company McAfee Associates in 1987 and ran it until 1994, when he resigned from the company. McAfee Associates achieved early success as the creators of McAfee, the first commercial antiv***s software, and they now produce an entire line of enterprise security software. The company was renamed to Intel Security in 2011 after being purchased by Intel, though the software still retains the McAfee brand name. McAfee's wealth peaked in 2007 at $100 million, before his investments suffered in the global financial crisis that began that year."
You mean that John McAfee? The one who actually invented cyber-security, and showed everyone else how it's done? I'll take his word for it anytime over some mysterious 'anonymous source'.
John McAfee: br br "John David McAfee is a B... (
show quote)
I know who he is! And, if you do more research on him you will find out that he has turned into a real nut case!
Rivers wrote:
It may, or may not have been hacked by the Russians, but I sure as hell wouldn't believe anything John McAfee says....that guy is a real nut case.
Rivers-he may be a nut case but still makes more sense than the BS we are being fed by our own intelligence chiefs.
The four points which he stressed are valid. (included Russian language, used cyriliic keyboard, included date/time stamp coinciding with business hours in Russia, included IP ) Looks like this was intended to point the finger at Russia . Our intel chiefs insist Putin was behind this. Do you really think Putin is stupid enough to leave himself that wide open ?? Good Luck America !!!
"The report’s vagueness and lack of specificity leave it sounding more like a brief catalog of innuendo than an indictment." Just what we've been saying all along.
“It’s my opinion and speculation that there were some really good government analysts and operators contributing to this data, and then, report reviews, leadership approval processes and sanitation processes stripped out most of the value and left behind a very confusing report trying to cover too much while saying too little.” Yeah, like saying nothing at all.
Larry the Legend wrote:
"The report’s vagueness and lack of specificity leave it sounding more like a brief catalog of innuendo than an indictment." Just what we've been saying all along.
“It’s my opinion and speculation that there were some really good government analysts and operators contributing to this data, and then, report reviews, leadership approval processes and sanitation processes stripped out most of the value and left behind a very confusing report trying to cover too much while saying too little.” Yeah, like saying nothing at all.
"The report’s vagueness and lack of specifici... (
show quote)
They think we are as stupid as they believe themselves to be smart.
If you don't want information on your insecure computer to become public don't put it in.
If you don't want information on your insecure computer to become public don't put it in.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.