oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Now old Chucky means the nominee must be liberal, that is what he means by "mainstream". I guess they all think like that since their main tool, the media, is considered mainstream. Scalia may never be replaced before 2019 when there could be a Senate controlled by Republicans with a 60 member group. Do you remember the way the Democrats "c***ted" on the e******n Al Franken to get their 60 seat majority and thereby pass Obamacare? I sure do remember that shuffling of cars to find b****ts in backseats and trunks.


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/01/04/schumer-ill-block-trumps-supreme-court-nominee-if-theyre-not-mainstream-n2266925?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad=

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

If the Republicans don't muscle Schumer out of the way we need to tar and feather them.

PeterS

What goes around come around....

Ricko Loc: Florida

oldroy-believe the republicans will allow Schumer to have his fifteen minutes of fame on national TV then they will resort to the old Harry Reid tactic and look at the Nuclear Option. Good Luck America !!!~

son of witless

Yes you are correct. Uncle Harry's shenanigans are coming around to bite Democrats in the buttocks. Ain't it sweet ?????

robmull Loc: florida

Ain't THAT the t***h, pecker. I can see the entire "Dingy" Harry's liberal progressive Congress, ALL trying to kick themselves in the ass for making it so easy for the majority to do about ANYTHING they want!!! Harry, Pelosi and "Barry" {and the radical Marx/Alinsky cabal} NEVER thought it possible for a Republican conservative to EVER be in the majority again in Congress, ever; let alone in the drivers seat. They are STILL in shock. Although nothing like this "Taqiyya" ideology and agenda has been predominant in our free-market government before, our "Creator," {with the help of our Founding Fathers}, expected anyone, from Attila to Nero to Pilate to Hu, to attempt to invade our "experimental, WE THE PEOPLE" Western civilization; and made the "invasion," all but impossible. Sure, "WE" listened to everything everybody had to say throughout our history, and "experimented" with every person who had serious political intentions of attempting to guide OUR ship. Some of the "contestants," were very, very good, and some, not-so-much; but "WE" were watching. And American patriots never sleep. It's "fore and aft" watch, and "WE" didn't become the most powerful and most humanitarian nation on earth by wimping-out at the obviously (D)istinct possibility of a absolute "stranger" trying to "fundamentally t***sform" our "Shining Light on the Hill." And sure-enough. And sure enough - GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. TRUMP!!! "MAKE AMERICA {AND ISRAEL} GREAT AGAIN!!!"

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Seems to me like Reid set a precedent...didn't he?

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Folks, I meant to get some debate about the Democrats not v****g for anyone who isn't a liberal. Schumer saying mainstream was just another way of saying liberal. Right now there is nothing but talk from the right and the left about not v****g for someone who isn't in favor of a******n or who is in favor of it. Of course, the Dems won't v**er for anyone who might be against a******n since that one thing is so important to them getting and holding offices. Right now I keep seeing words about judges who are in favor or not in favor of a******n. Does a judge have to favor a******n for Dems to v**e for him? It certainly seems so when you listen to Schumer and Pelosi.

Liberty Tree

By mainstream he means, pro-a******n, pro L**T, anti-second amendment, etc.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Seems like it's far past time to shove some s**t down the Dem's throats. I don't believe the Republicans can't get their nominee in. Not for a second!

PeterS

I don't know. How many Supreme Court Nominees did he block?

PeterS

Reed left the nuclear option open for the Supreme Court and it still takes 60 v**es for confirmation for the SC so yes, it is sweet because, unless Schumer likes the pick he can block him or her for as long as he so desires.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

You are right and then he can blame the Republicans for amending the Constitution about numbers of judges. This will work quite well for left leaners since they don't want more than 8 justices. That is true, isn't it, Petey?

son of witless

Can he block Trump for 8 years?

PeterS

He can block until he no longer can garner 40 v**es.