Romney was right about Obama's re-e******n
Dec 21, 2013 09:15:06 #
This is,,, liberalism, a lie. We humans don't have a better more descriptive word for what this syndrom-atic "Dis - ease" is,, so we label the collective symptoms "satanic"
Kind of like a grouped diagnosis for fibromyalgia.
The bible is a story of human character,,, with actors playing parts.
When Satan, couldn't control heaven,, he fought. Discovering he couldn't k**l god, he decided to hurt him,, and he would "USE" what God loved,,, humans. Instead of just k**l the humans he decided to pervert the relationship, so that God would be separated from them.
Richard, h**es others,,, so he lies, and attempt to get you to believe the lies,,, when you wont, and people who can discern realize very quickly how bankrupt what he says is,,, he goes for the thing you love. Your children,,, to educate them in a perverse manner, destroy their faith in t***h, pervert their sense of right and wrong, and assist them in despising you, for claiming t***h exists.
If he can get you to discuss, his trivia of lies, then he is able to hide amongst the minutia.... when held to his lies, and you refuse to discuss,,, he has no power.
"Satanic" doesn't mean a devil with horns,,, it is this, the founder of lies, the purveyor of lies, the fool who accepted the lies. Furious, that he was the only one to accept the lies, he then tries to destroy the t***h for you, and failing that he goes for your children.
How perversely apropos that he became a "teacher" .... satanic, in the perversion of thought, satanic in the perfection of purpose,,, how perfectly sinister and h**e-filled. Satanic,,,, yes,,, that is it,,, liberalism.
Kind of like a grouped diagnosis for fibromyalgia.
The bible is a story of human character,,, with actors playing parts.
When Satan, couldn't control heaven,, he fought. Discovering he couldn't k**l god, he decided to hurt him,, and he would "USE" what God loved,,, humans. Instead of just k**l the humans he decided to pervert the relationship, so that God would be separated from them.
Richard, h**es others,,, so he lies, and attempt to get you to believe the lies,,, when you wont, and people who can discern realize very quickly how bankrupt what he says is,,, he goes for the thing you love. Your children,,, to educate them in a perverse manner, destroy their faith in t***h, pervert their sense of right and wrong, and assist them in despising you, for claiming t***h exists.
If he can get you to discuss, his trivia of lies, then he is able to hide amongst the minutia.... when held to his lies, and you refuse to discuss,,, he has no power.
"Satanic" doesn't mean a devil with horns,,, it is this, the founder of lies, the purveyor of lies, the fool who accepted the lies. Furious, that he was the only one to accept the lies, he then tries to destroy the t***h for you, and failing that he goes for your children.
How perversely apropos that he became a "teacher" .... satanic, in the perversion of thought, satanic in the perfection of purpose,,, how perfectly sinister and h**e-filled. Satanic,,,, yes,,, that is it,,, liberalism.
faithistheword wrote:
Such is the state of education today--someone as partisan as Richard is TEACHING OUR CHILDREN!! I don't really care what age level he teaches, he should not have access to our childrens' minds! I wonder how many times a day he expresses the same disgust that he shows Ve'hoe--to his students. How many times a day he rolls his eyes at a conservative comment by a student? He sounds like an arrogant know-it-all, and woe to the student that stands up to his socialist ideas!
Dec 24, 2013 00:03:39 #
If he didn't c***t on his taxes then why did refuse to release his returns? He basically admitted he c***ted when asked why he refused to release his returns and he replied: " I'm not going to release my tax returns because they will find something wrong with them." Well it there's nothing wrong with them to begin with there would be nothing to find right? How can you tell if someone is a republican? They're either really rich or really stupid!
Dec 24, 2013 08:28:02 #
Whom is he?
If you use the 'quote reply' the answer would be from the post prior and not back 3 or 4 pages of posts.
If you use the 'quote reply' the answer would be from the post prior and not back 3 or 4 pages of posts.
Timeforreality wrote:
If he didn't c***t on his taxes then why did refuse to release his returns? He basically admitted he c***ted when asked why he refused to release his returns and he replied: " I'm not going to release my tax returns because they will find something wrong with them." Well it there's nothing wrong with them to begin with there would be nothing to find right? How can you tell if someone is a republican? They're either really rich or really stupid!
Dec 24, 2013 08:28:02 #
Whom is he?
If you use the 'quote reply' the answer would be from the post prior and not back 3 or 4 pages of posts.
If you use the 'quote reply' the answer would be from the post prior and not back 3 or 4 pages of posts.
Timeforreality wrote:
If he didn't c***t on his taxes then why did refuse to release his returns? He basically admitted he c***ted when asked why he refused to release his returns and he replied: " I'm not going to release my tax returns because they will find something wrong with them." Well it there's nothing wrong with them to begin with there would be nothing to find right? How can you tell if someone is a republican? They're either really rich or really stupid!
Dec 24, 2013 08:31:15 #
He released 2 years. He is not obligated to release more. If the left was so concerned with Tax C***ts why did you make a REAL Tax C***t Secretary of Treasury? Geithner
Timeforreality wrote:
If he didn't c***t on his taxes then why did refuse to release his returns? He basically admitted he c***ted when asked why he refused to release his returns and he replied: " I'm not going to release my tax returns because they will find something wrong with them." Well it there's nothing wrong with them to begin with there would be nothing to find right? How can you tell if someone is a republican? They're either really rich or really stupid!
Dec 24, 2013 09:03:19 #
Timeforreality wrote:
Did you v**e for this multi-millionaire tax c***t? He made his money selling the pieces of companies out from under the workers the very thing that is breaking the back of working people in this country. Romney would hve brought on a depression for sure.
Did you v**e for the c*******t in the WH? That makes you more pathetic than the person your answered. At least v****g for Romney showed he wasnt a t*****r to this country.
Dec 24, 2013 09:55:27 #
Timeforreality wrote:
Did you v**e for this multi-millionaire tax c***t? He made his money selling the pieces of companies out from under the workers the very thing that is breaking the back of working people in this country. Romney would hve brought on a depression for sure.
Don't really know if you're a liberal or what. But in reality (strange you have the moniker 'Timeforreality' but can't handle same) Romney did what virtually ALL other capitalists have done with non-productive companies. Bought them, sold off the parts that did work, and abolished the parts that didn't work. Just a note for you, the IRS and our own gov brought the American steel industry to its knees because the big steel mills of the '60's knew they were not obligated to pay "duty tax" on steel made in Alabama or Pittsburg and shipped/sold to someplace in Idaho or Kansas. No one owes "duty tax" on goods made in America and sold somewhere else in America. Where is your concern there or a time for reality..?? Or did you even know this.??
Further, Romney has a double standard. He was the one who enacted a similar legislation about health insurance in Massachusetts when he was governor there. And Obama and he discussed this In the debates - on nationwide television. For me, neither was a valid candidate for POTUS.
Dec 24, 2013 11:00:49 #
Sold off parts that did work? I am not quite sure you understand what Bain actually does. As far as Romneycare goes at very least it fell within the parameters of the enumerated powers. States rights.
trucksterbud wrote:
Don't really know if you're a liberal or what. Bu... (show quote)
Dec 24, 2013 22:27:23 #
Timeforreality wrote:
If he didn't c***t on his taxes then why did refuse to release his returns? He basically admitted he c***ted when asked why he refused to release his returns and he replied: " I'm not going to release my tax returns because they will find something wrong with them." Well it there's nothing wrong with them to begin with there would be nothing to find right? How can you tell if someone is a republican? They're either really rich or really stupid!
By your own conditions, then Obastard is NOT a legal President because he is using his "position" to hide the fact that he isnt a citizen, thus legitimately the President of the USA/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.