One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
N.C. Officer Will Not Be Charged In Shooting Death Of Keith Lamont Scott
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 30, 2016 12:09:37   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
If you live in NC, brace yourself for more r**ts.

A police officer in Charlotte, North Carolina, will not face charges in the shooting death of Keith Lamont Scott.

Scott's death unleashed two days of unrest this past September in Charlotte, when protesters took to the streets and in some cases threw objects at police and smashed windows.

R. Andrew Murray, the Mecklenburg Count district attorney, said during a news conference that he was "entirely convinced" that Police officer Brentley Vinson "was lawful in using deadly force."

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/30/503866796/n-c-officer-will-not-be-charged-in-shooting-death-of-keith-lamont-scott

Reply
Nov 30, 2016 12:45:20   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Pennylynn wrote:
If you live in NC, brace yourself for more r**ts.

A police officer in Charlotte, North Carolina, will not face charges in the shooting death of Keith Lamont Scott.

Scott's death unleashed two days of unrest this past September in Charlotte, when protesters took to the streets and in some cases threw objects at police and smashed windows.

R. Andrew Murray, the Mecklenburg Count district attorney, said during a news conference that he was "entirely convinced" that Police officer Brentley Vinson "was lawful in using deadly force."

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/30/503866796/n-c-officer-will-not-be-charged-in-shooting-death-of-keith-lamont-scott
If you live in NC, brace yourself for more r**ts. ... (show quote)


The good guys win again!!!!!

Reply
Nov 30, 2016 12:58:11   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
When this was briefed, Scott had a gun and a live round chambered with hammer back..... the surrounding information made it clear, the officer took the only action available. All the witness who said scott was only reading a book... were in positions where they could not see or "borrowed" statements from youtube.

Even with all the evidence, there will be those who will be in denial and go back to what they know best.... r**ting, l**ting, and burning.
PoppaGringo wrote:
The good guys win again!!!!!



Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2016 09:24:38   #
DanceTherapist Loc: NYC, now Oakland, Ca
 
Pennylynn wrote:
If you live in NC, brace yourself for more r**ts.

A police officer in Charlotte, North Carolina, will not face charges in the shooting death of Keith Lamont Scott.

Scott's death unleashed two days of unrest this past September in Charlotte, when protesters took to the streets and in some cases threw objects at police and smashed windows.

R. Andrew Murray, the Mecklenburg Count district attorney, said during a news conference that he was "entirely convinced" that Police officer Brentley Vinson "was lawful in using deadly force."

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/11/30/503866796/n-c-officer-will-not-be-charged-in-shooting-death-of-keith-lamont-scott
If you live in NC, brace yourself for more r**ts. ... (show quote)


And his family says this is not the end of this. I can hardly blame them. If he had a gun, didn't have a gun, shooting by police is unacceptable. And, by the way, I have loads of Christmas in my heart. Do you still have bags of Mr. Putin in your heart?



Reply
Dec 1, 2016 10:02:00   #
Morgan
 
Pennylynn wrote:
When this was briefed, Scott had a gun and a live round chambered with hammer back..... the surrounding information made it clear, the officer took the only action available. All the witness who said scott was only reading a book... were in positions where they could not see or "borrowed" statements from youtube.

Even with all the evidence, there will be those who will be in denial and go back to what they know best.... r**ting, l**ting, and burning.

When this was briefed, Scott had a gun and a live ... (show quote)



Only action available...questionable, he could have shot him once and taken it from there...

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 10:15:53   #
DanceTherapist Loc: NYC, now Oakland, Ca
 
Morgan wrote:
Only action available...questionable, he could have shot him once and taken it from there...


Well, Morgan. I have heard this was the only action "available" to the officer. I wish no one was k**led for any reason whatsoever. More plans in place. Something. Anything. I am opposed to the death penalty. For anyone. No one deserves to be k**led by the State. Donald Trump will go wild with the death penalty which is still on the books in California, and has been banned by every other country, except for the Middle East and Nigeria, where it is done vigilante style. Sad.

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 10:28:23   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Of course his family says this is not the end, if they can win the case then they are set for life if they spend the money wisely and their lawyers do not take most of their "awards"off the top. But, if they are like the vast majority of people who are not taught how to manage their finances, they will be broke again within three years. At this point, it is not about a wrongful death, who shot the man, or even justice; it is all about how much they will get from their law suits. To be sure, I am surprised that Charlotte is not a war zone this morning, it seems that B*M was in town and encouraging another round of r**ting, but for some reason.... they found few who would take to the streets again, perhaps there was not enough l**t in the stores to provide incentive. Regardless, on to your point.... "shooting by police is unacceptable." I have only one thing to say... disarming officers is not in your best interest.

Last, I have respect for President Putin and his willingness to work with the US in as he said in his State of Union Address to Russians ".....solving global and regional problems are in the interest of the entire world. Putin also said he hoped to join the United States to fight the threat of international terrorism." Now then, do you still have "bags" of obama in your heart?

DanceTherapist wrote:
And his family says this is not the end of this. I can hardly blame them. If he had a gun, didn't have a gun, shooting by police is unacceptable. And, by the way, I have loads of Christmas in my heart. Do you still have bags of Mr. Putin in your heart?

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2016 10:46:51   #
righty Loc: Tenn
 
DanceTherapist wrote:
Well, Morgan. I have heard this was the only action "available" to the officer. I wish no one was k**led for any reason whatsoever. More plans in place. Something. Anything. I am opposed to the death penalty. For anyone. No one deserves to be k**led by the State. Donald Trump will go wild with the death penalty which is still on the books in California, and has been banned by every other country, except for the Middle East and Nigeria, where it is done vigilante style. Sad.


Donald Trump will go wild with the death penalty? Please explain exactly how is this going to happen?

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 10:52:14   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
And if the gun in his hand had been dropped, then there would be no reason for anyone being shot. Reminder, the chamber had a live round and the hammer was cocked. That means that Scott was ready to shoot, the only question was which officer he intended to murder.

Morgan wrote:
Only action available...questionable, he could have shot him once and taken it from there...

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 10:59:40   #
J.A.F.I.1946
 
Way I see it...when a Police Officer tells you to do something, ( stop, put the gun down, get on the ground etc) do what he/she says, simple, follow commands...don't follow commands get shot, simple...just thinkin

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 12:05:43   #
boatbob2
 
Im ALL in for the POLICE,In my past,when a gun was pulled,or pointed at me,I shot and k**led that i***t, then I didnt have to worry about him finishing his job.Though I NEVER shot anyone in the back,

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2016 14:00:20   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
If you are implying that scott was shot in the back... he was not.

boatbob2 wrote:
Im ALL in for the POLICE,In my past,when a gun was pulled,or pointed at me,I shot and k**led that i***t, then I didnt have to worry about him finishing his job.Though I NEVER shot anyone in the back,

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 21:06:54   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
DanceTherapist wrote:
And his family says this is not the end of this. I can hardly blame them. If he had a gun, didn't have a gun, shooting by police is unacceptable. And, by the way, I have loads of Christmas in my heart. Do you still have bags of Mr. Putin in your heart?


I must be mistaken so instead of doing what too many here do, I'll just ask.

Are you saying that even.if the facts show this shooting.to be justifiable it is still unacceptable to you?

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 21:14:07   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Docadhoc wrote:
I must be mistaken so instead of doing what too many here do, I'll just ask.

Are you saying that even.if the facts show this shooting.to be justifiable it is still unacceptable to you?


Of course it would, she is a L*****t ideologue. However, she might feel somewhat different if it was her daughter or grandchild that had been k**led by one of the L*****t thugs.

Reply
Dec 1, 2016 21:15:39   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Of course his family says this is not the end, if they can win the case then they are set for life if they spend the money wisely and their lawyers do not take most of their "awards"off the top. But, if they are like the vast majority of people who are not taught how to manage their finances, they will be broke again within three years. At this point, it is not about a wrongful death, who shot the man, or even justice; it is all about how much they will get from their law suits. To be sure, I am surprised that Charlotte is not a war zone this morning, it seems that B*M was in town and encouraging another round of r**ting, but for some reason.... they found few who would take to the streets again, perhaps there was not enough l**t in the stores to provide incentive. Regardless, on to your point.... "shooting by police is unacceptable." I have only one thing to say... disarming officers is not in your best interest.

Last, I have respect for President Putin and his willingness to work with the US in as he said in his State of Union Address to Russians ".....solving global and regional problems are in the interest of the entire world. Putin also said he hoped to join the United States to fight the threat of international terrorism." Now then, do you still have "bags" of obama in your heart?
Of course his family says this is not the end, if ... (show quote)


I am mildly surprised that the same people who welcome unvetted muslims with open arms are the same people who fear Putin to be untrustworthy.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.