jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

My guess is , no liberals will respond to this post. It seems liberals have an allergic reaction to the t***h, causing convulsions, rash, and the t***h T***p w*n, whining and crying. The symptoms liberals experience to the t***h, evidence, and facts are so severe that safe rooms with teddy bears and crayons are a recommended treatment requiring time off of work and school for treatment.
With that said, Warning to any liberals unable to convince your conservative boss any extra time off of work, read at your risk.

If you have been following the news, there is a new nationwide show called Hypocrisy Heights. It stars defeated c*******ts, Green Party P**********l candidate Jill Stein and Democratic Party P**********l candidate Hillary Clinton. Clinton, if you remember, was spastic about the possibilities that Donald Trump would not accept the results of the p**********l e******n if he lost. Stein and Clinton have decided to challenge the results of the e******n in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan, if they can raise enough money to do so. In reality, Clinton likely will also assist in funding the recounts initiated by Stein. This, after her fit that Trump may undermine the democratic process with a challenge if he lost.

On October 20, the news narrative was full of stories about Trump responding to a question during the third p**********l debate about whether he would accept the result of the e******n if he lost. He responded, "I will tell you at the time. I'll keep you in suspense." Clinton tweeted that his stance was "horrifying" saying that it "was not the way our democracy works." Trump was labeled "dangerous" and damaging to democracy by the current "president." Reporters speculated for days what Trump not accepting defeat would do to the country. Political analysts at colleges and universities said it undermines the credibility of the elected president and could foment a shadow presidency by the loser, a divided nation.

Nary a mention from the news media about all the post-debate hysteria by Clinton, the Democratic Party and the "president." Clinton's camp is saying it wants to show that it is exploring all the options even though there is no "actionable evidence" suggesting foul play. Using the narrative that Russia could have hacked the US e******n and put Trump in office, Clinton justifies undermining the Republic. In reality, she shouldn't want a recount considering there are several experts pointing to untold millions of illegal v**es cast by noncitizens and dead people who are likely to have v**ed Clinton. But Clinton is now exploring all options to something she called horrifying a month ago. Hypocrisy Heights.

As citizens, we all should be concerned that e******ns are fair and conducted without foul play. Trump should insist on a recount of all the v**es in New York, California, Oregon, Washington, New Jersey, and just for kicks, Illinois, where the cemeteries are full of reliable v**ers. He may win by a landslide of the popular v**e after all the illegal v**es are thrown out. Notwithstanding, Clinton and her backers will not stop in trying to undermine our Constitutional Republic and replace it with a form of c*******m. As Jesus said about the scribes and Pharisees in Matthew 23:28, we can say about these hypocrites, "...you outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity."

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Liberals serve a purpose now...you know it as well as I do...TARGET HOLDERS at the Rifle Range....see I told ya so!

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Excellent point, I was also thinking they would be useful working as the cleanup crew at fukushima nuke plant. There are enough of them that rotated out, it could be clean in about two years.

Loki Loc: Georgia

A recount in California (by hand) would remove California from the equation. T***p w*n the E*******l College before the California v**e was even counted. Once more, they have accomplished nothing except to show that they, like their supporters, are whiny assed, butthurt losers. In the almost impossible event that all three states fail to finish their recount in the time allotted, the president would be selected by the House of Representatives, (R-242, D-194,) selecting the next president by choosing between Hillary and Trump. Wanna bet on that one?

ftnsdlinda Loc: Tennessee

I'm just grateful that due to the obviously biased coverage by the MSM during the e******n....Everyone is on to the propaganda like never before. The only ones who take what hypocrisy heights participants say are other liberal hypocrits.

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

There is an underlying motive that is not obvious, other than Jill Stein lining her pockets, or expecting enough v**es to swing a state in clintons favor. I have yet to reason the (real) motive, given some time I believe it will reveal itself. Any thoughts?

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

I fully agree with you, more liberals are now questioning their news source. They are the democrats of old school, not the l*****t the party has t***sformed into. I suspect over the next few years these will Exodus the party towards independent and even conservative.

Sadly the "other hypocrites " make up majority of the party and growing. I expect as the party implodes these will migrate over to the c*******t /marxist /liberal /l*****t party such as socialist Bernie Sanders or his replacement.

ftnsdlinda Loc: Tennessee

Yes, the old school Democrats did not leave the party, the party left them. I see the same thing.

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Welcome to the forum. There are some great people here. Many very educated, many without formal higher education and I learn from them all, with exception to l*****t, capable of only quoting liberal media talking points.

Tip; when replying to a specific thread, use the "quote reply" button, this allows everyone to see with whom you are replying to.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Unless it's some hairball idea about abolishing the e*******l college, I have no clue. In the nearly impossible event that Trump loses all three contested states, while he will no longer have 270 v**es, he will still have more than Hillary, forcing a showdown in the Republican controlled House to pick between Hillary and Trump for president. Wanna bet on that one?

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Well, with exception of a very few rouge congressmen my bet would be on Trump winning the house. I believe it would be nearly mathematically impossible for Hillary to turn over three states, or even one.
The only reason I can think of Jill Stein pushing the recount is , bigger minds than hers using Stein to Rev up the protesters, and those supporting the protesters to broaden the base of Bernie Sanders supporters or the c*******t /socialist sympathizers. Forming and strengthening a new party, as the Democrat party implodes.
That's the best I can surmise at this juncture.

Ricktloml

The real motive is to stain Trump's e******n and deny that he has a mandate. This e******n was not only a repudiation of Hillary, but Obama, the Democrat party and their collaborative media and the fundamental t***sformation that their progressive ideology had planned. And like evil in general, progressives are not going to admit they were wrong, they will continue to try to inflict as much damage to the Trump presidency as possible in order to deligitimize the repudiation of their agenda

ftnsdlinda Loc: Tennessee

Exactly!