One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Recount Freakout
Nov 26, 2016 16:07:26   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/recount-freakout.php

Recount Freakout

If you’re a liberal, anything is better than admitting that you lost. So now, just weeks after cautioning Donald Trump’s supporters that they had better accept the results of the e******n unlike the Democrats in 2000 and 2004), Democrats led by Jill Stein are demanding recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Left-wingers have donated millions of dollars, and the Hillary Clinton campaign has announced that it will participate in Stein’s recount efforts.

The p**********l e******n wasn’t particularly close: T***p w*n, 306-232. Still, if you convert Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to Hillary Clinton victories, she would edge Trump out, 278 to 260. That is obviously the basis on which those states were chosen. However, there is zero chance that a recount will change the result in any of those states, let alone all of them. T***p w*n Wisconsin by more than 20,000 v**es, Michigan by 10,704 v**es, and Pennsylvania by more than 70,000 v**es. Lots of luck with those recounts.

Jill Stein claims that she isn’t trying to favor one p**********l candidate over the other, but only wants to assure a fair process. That is nonsense. The states she and other liberal activists have chosen to challenge are not those where the race was closest. How about New Hampshire, which Hillary Clinton won by around 2,700 v**es? Or Nevada, which she won by a little over 26,000? Even Minnesota was a whole lot closer than Pennsylvania; with its notoriously lax b****t security, Minnesota could be fertile territory for questioning e******n results.

Liberals know they aren’t going to overturn the result of the e******n through recounts, they just want to undermine Trump’s victory by making vague allegations of irregularities, “hacking,” and so on, which will circulate in the fever swamp for the next four years. It is, in other words, just another attempt by liberals to undermine our democracy.



Sent from my iPad

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 16:17:19   #
bahmer
 
AuntiE wrote:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/recount-freakout.php

Recount Freakout

If you’re a liberal, anything is better than admitting that you lost. So now, just weeks after cautioning Donald Trump’s supporters that they had better accept the results of the e******n unlike the Democrats in 2000 and 2004), Democrats led by Jill Stein are demanding recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Left-wingers have donated millions of dollars, and the Hillary Clinton campaign has announced that it will participate in Stein’s recount efforts.

The p**********l e******n wasn’t particularly close: T***p w*n, 306-232. Still, if you convert Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to Hillary Clinton victories, she would edge Trump out, 278 to 260. That is obviously the basis on which those states were chosen. However, there is zero chance that a recount will change the result in any of those states, let alone all of them. T***p w*n Wisconsin by more than 20,000 v**es, Michigan by 10,704 v**es, and Pennsylvania by more than 70,000 v**es. Lots of luck with those recounts.

Jill Stein claims that she isn’t trying to favor one p**********l candidate over the other, but only wants to assure a fair process. That is nonsense. The states she and other liberal activists have chosen to challenge are not those where the race was closest. How about New Hampshire, which Hillary Clinton won by around 2,700 v**es? Or Nevada, which she won by a little over 26,000? Even Minnesota was a whole lot closer than Pennsylvania; with its notoriously lax b****t security, Minnesota could be fertile territory for questioning e******n results.

Liberals know they aren’t going to overturn the result of the e******n through recounts, they just want to undermine Trump’s victory by making vague allegations of irregularities, “hacking,” and so on, which will circulate in the fever swamp for the next four years. It is, in other words, just another attempt by liberals to undermine our democracy.



Sent from my iPad
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/reco... (show quote)


The liberals are notoriously c***ters as was evidenced by Hillary and her c***ting all through the primaries and debates it comes as no surprise and we as republicans had better watch both the left hand as well as the right hand at the same time because they will c***t here as well if they can get by with it. Be prepared for revolutionary war it may still be coming AuntiE and if it comes there will be blood spilled.

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 16:27:46   #
son of witless
 
AuntiE wrote:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/recount-freakout.php

Recount Freakout

If you’re a liberal, anything is better than admitting that you lost. So now, just weeks after cautioning Donald Trump’s supporters that they had better accept the results of the e******n unlike the Democrats in 2000 and 2004), Democrats led by Jill Stein are demanding recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Left-wingers have donated millions of dollars, and the Hillary Clinton campaign has announced that it will participate in Stein’s recount efforts.

The p**********l e******n wasn’t particularly close: T***p w*n, 306-232. Still, if you convert Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to Hillary Clinton victories, she would edge Trump out, 278 to 260. That is obviously the basis on which those states were chosen. However, there is zero chance that a recount will change the result in any of those states, let alone all of them. T***p w*n Wisconsin by more than 20,000 v**es, Michigan by 10,704 v**es, and Pennsylvania by more than 70,000 v**es. Lots of luck with those recounts.

Jill Stein claims that she isn’t trying to favor one p**********l candidate over the other, but only wants to assure a fair process. That is nonsense. The states she and other liberal activists have chosen to challenge are not those where the race was closest. How about New Hampshire, which Hillary Clinton won by around 2,700 v**es? Or Nevada, which she won by a little over 26,000? Even Minnesota was a whole lot closer than Pennsylvania; with its notoriously lax b****t security, Minnesota could be fertile territory for questioning e******n results.

Liberals know they aren’t going to overturn the result of the e******n through recounts, they just want to undermine Trump’s victory by making vague allegations of irregularities, “hacking,” and so on, which will circulate in the fever swamp for the next four years. It is, in other words, just another attempt by liberals to undermine our democracy.



Sent from my iPad
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/reco... (show quote)



Always expect the worst from Scumocrats and they will never disappoint you.

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 17:27:27   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
bahmer wrote:
The liberals are notoriously c***ters as was evidenced by Hillary and her c***ting all through the primaries and debates it comes as no surprise and we as republicans had better watch both the left hand as well as the right hand at the same time because they will c***t here as well if they can get by with it. Be prepared for revolutionary war it may still be coming AuntiE and if it comes there will be blood spilled.


Damn right bahmer ,, when the right hand move's glance to the left hand but watch the right also , watch these bastards with both eyes wide open ,,, if necessary ,,
RIP their frigging throat out !! That's just the way it is ...



Reply
Nov 26, 2016 17:43:59   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Can't ya just hear it, 'oh look what we found in the back room 107,105 v**es only everyone of those v**es would have to for Clinton and not Johnson, Stein, Castle, De La Fuente, Moorehead or Trump. If that were to happen I think everyone should play their state lottery this week.



bahmer wrote:
The liberals are notoriously c***ters as was evidenced by Hillary and her c***ting all through the primaries and debates it comes as no surprise and we as republicans had better watch both the left hand as well as the right hand at the same time because they will c***t here as well if they can get by with it. Be prepared for revolutionary war it may still be coming AuntiE and if it comes there will be blood spilled.

Reply
Nov 26, 2016 18:16:55   #
bahmer
 
reconreb wrote:
Damn right bahmer ,, when the right hand move's glance to the left hand but watch the right also , watch these bastards with both eyes wide open ,,, if necessary ,,
RIP their frigging throat out !! That's just the way it is ...


It has to be a terribly miserable life when you feel so inadequate that you must c***t on everything or you feel that you will lose. Man you have

to c***t on the primaries with Bernie Sanders and the town hall meetings with him as well. Then she had to c***t on everyone of the debates

she had with Trump. Then she had to c***t on getting v**es and when she still failed she has to try an end run to win the presidency how truly

pathetic of a creature she is. Truly sad truly sad indeed.

Reply
Nov 27, 2016 02:52:02   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
AuntiE wrote:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/recount-freakout.php

Recount Freakout

If you’re a liberal, anything is better than admitting that you lost. So now, just weeks after cautioning Donald Trump’s supporters that they had better accept the results of the e******n unlike the Democrats in 2000 and 2004), Democrats led by Jill Stein are demanding recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Left-wingers have donated millions of dollars, and the Hillary Clinton campaign has announced that it will participate in Stein’s recount efforts.

The p**********l e******n wasn’t particularly close: T***p w*n, 306-232. Still, if you convert Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to Hillary Clinton victories, she would edge Trump out, 278 to 260. That is obviously the basis on which those states were chosen. However, there is zero chance that a recount will change the result in any of those states, let alone all of them. T***p w*n Wisconsin by more than 20,000 v**es, Michigan by 10,704 v**es, and Pennsylvania by more than 70,000 v**es. Lots of luck with those recounts.

Jill Stein claims that she isn’t trying to favor one p**********l candidate over the other, but only wants to assure a fair process. That is nonsense. The states she and other liberal activists have chosen to challenge are not those where the race was closest. How about New Hampshire, which Hillary Clinton won by around 2,700 v**es? Or Nevada, which she won by a little over 26,000? Even Minnesota was a whole lot closer than Pennsylvania; with its notoriously lax b****t security, Minnesota could be fertile territory for questioning e******n results.

Liberals know they aren’t going to overturn the result of the e******n through recounts, they just want to undermine Trump’s victory by making vague allegations of irregularities, “hacking,” and so on, which will circulate in the fever swamp for the next four years. It is, in other words, just another attempt by liberals to undermine our democracy.



Sent from my iPad
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/reco... (show quote)


As I mentioned in another post, I find it curious that Jill Stein was able to raise in 2 days, more money than she managed her entire campaign. She is not legally obligated to reveal the source of her windfall. However, back in Hillaryville, the same harridan who was "horrified" that Trump would not agree to abide by the results of the e******n has decided to get on board dat recount train. Still wonder where a nobody like Stein got that influx of recount cash?

Reply
Nov 27, 2016 02:57:38   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Loki wrote:
As I mentioned in another post, I find it curious that Jill Stein was able to raise in 2 days, more money than she managed her entire campaign. She is not legally obligated to reveal the source of her windfall. However, back in Hillaryville, the same harridan who was "horrified" that Trump would not agree to abide by the results of the e******n has decided to get on board dat recount train. Still wonder where a nobody like Stein got that influx of recount cash?


Being a conspiracy theorist, I will go with Soros indirectly funding it. He could not be obvious in his attempt to derail Mr. Trump, nor can Mrs. Clinton. They are using Stein with the caveat any left over funds she can keep.

It gets better. You cannot make this stuff up. I just received this from a friend. Try the link.

http://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-politicalrhetoricbusters/jill_stein_slams_hillary/

Reply
Nov 27, 2016 06:05:28   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
bahmer wrote:
It has to be a terribly miserable life when you feel so inadequate that you must c***t on everything or you feel that you will lose. Man you have

to c***t on the primaries with Bernie Sanders and the town hall meetings with him as well. Then she had to c***t on everyone of the debates

she had with Trump. Then she had to c***t on getting v**es and when she still failed she has to try an end run to win the presidency how truly

pathetic of a creature she is. Truly sad truly sad indeed.
It has to be a terribly miserable life when you fe... (show quote)



Reply
Nov 27, 2016 06:08:34   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
Loki wrote:
As I mentioned in another post, I find it curious that Jill Stein was able to raise in 2 days, more money than she managed her entire campaign. She is not legally obligated to reveal the source of her windfall. However, back in Hillaryville, the same harridan who was "horrified" that Trump would not agree to abide by the results of the e******n has decided to get on board dat recount train. Still wonder where a nobody like Stein got that influx of recount cash?


Soros ..

Reply
Nov 27, 2016 06:12:13   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
AuntiE wrote:
Being a conspiracy theorist, I will go with Soros indirectly funding it. He could not be obvious in his attempt to derail Mr. Trump, nor can Mrs. Clinton. They are using Stein with the caveat any left over funds she can keep.

It gets better. You cannot make this stuff up. I just received this from a friend. Try the link.

http://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-politicalrhetoricbusters/jill_stein_slams_hillary/


OH WELL ,, sometimes a roach must be stomped on more than once !!

Reply
Nov 27, 2016 09:18:13   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
My first thought was the Clinton people but you know I think you may be correct. I never hope for anyone's death but Soros could be a game changer for me and it couldn't happen to a nicer guy.



AuntiE wrote:
Being a conspiracy theorist, I will go with Soros indirectly funding it. He could not be obvious in his attempt to derail Mr. Trump, nor can Mrs. Clinton. They are using Stein with the caveat any left over funds she can keep.

It gets better. You cannot make this stuff up. I just received this from a friend. Try the link.

http://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-politicalrhetoricbusters/jill_stein_slams_hillary/

Reply
Nov 27, 2016 09:46:06   #
bahmer
 
bmac32 wrote:
My first thought was the Clinton people but you know I think you may be correct. I never hope for anyone's death but Soros could be a game changer for me and it couldn't happen to a nicer guy.


Amen and Amen

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.