One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Liberal Media Still Lying: Minorities Put Trump Over the Top
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 13, 2016 02:17:12   #
Chameleon12
 
Apparently, the media is not reporting the complete t***h still. Trump only got 1% more of the white v**e than Romney got, and Romney lost. It was minorities that put Trump over the top. Watch This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhUXSX3ZnpE

Here's the breakdown between Romney's and Trump's e******n percentages:

Romney Trump
W****s: 57% W****s: 58%
African Americans: 1% African Americans: 8%
Hispanics: 21% Hispanics: 29%
Asians: 18% Asians: 29%
Other: 36% Other: 37%

It was obvious, when they v**ed in Obama, that Americans abhorred the establishment. Democrats failed to realize this when they chose the very iconic image of the Republican and Democratic establishments, Hillary Clinton. If Bernie Sanders had won the Democratic nomination, we would probably have a very different president right now.

Reply
Nov 13, 2016 04:17:31   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
Apparently, the media is not reporting the complete t***h still. Trump only got 1% more of the white v**e than Romney got, and Romney lost. It was minorities that put Trump over the top. Watch This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhUXSX3ZnpE

Here's the breakdown between Romney's and Trump's e******n percentages:

Romney Trump
W****s: 57% W****s: 58%
African Americans: 1% African Americans: 8%
Hispanics: 21% Hispanics: 29%
Asians: 18% Asians: 29%
Other: 36% Other: 37%

It was obvious, when they v**ed in Obama, that Americans abhorred the establishment. Democrats failed to realize this when they chose the very iconic image of the Republican and Democratic establishments, Hillary Clinton. If Bernie Sanders had won the Democratic nomination, we would probably have a very different president right now.
Apparently, the media is not reporting the complet... (show quote)


I keep hearing some say bernie would beat Trump , well that's a hypothetical that can not be proven so it means NADDA !!

Reply
Nov 13, 2016 08:33:28   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
Apparently, the media is not reporting the complete t***h still. Trump only got 1% more of the white v**e than Romney got, and Romney lost. It was minorities that put Trump over the top. Watch This: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhUXSX3ZnpE

Here's the breakdown between Romney's and Trump's e******n percentages:

Romney Trump
W****s: 57% W****s: 58%
African Americans: 1% African Americans: 8%
Hispanics: 21% Hispanics: 29%
Asians: 18% Asians: 29%
Other: 36% Other: 37%

It was obvious, when they v**ed in Obama, that Americans abhorred the establishment. Democrats failed to realize this when they chose the very iconic image of the Republican and Democratic establishments, Hillary Clinton. If Bernie Sanders had won the Democratic nomination, we would probably have a very different president right now.
Apparently, the media is not reporting the complet... (show quote)


In case you didn't see the actual e******n results, Clinton won the popular v**e by over 300,000, but lost the e*******l college, which included at least one e*****r that stated he would not v**e for Clinton - no matter what. I would be curious to see what the e******n results were in the State that e*****r is from. Why do we even have two separate e******ns anyway?

Reply
Nov 13, 2016 09:17:42   #
Rivers
 
lpnmajor wrote:
In case you didn't see the actual e******n results, Clinton won the popular v**e by over 300,000, but lost the e*******l college, which included at least one e*****r that stated he would not v**e for Clinton - no matter what. I would be curious to see what the e******n results were in the State that e*****r is from. Why do we even have two separate e******ns anyway?


Why do we have two systems? If the e******n results were solely determined by the popular v**e, large populous states like CA and NY would control the outcome of the e******ns and small states would have essentially no say. Candidates would bypass small states and spend most their campaign time and money in those more populous states. And, since CA and NY are full of liberals you get an e******n result like we have today with Hillary getting the popular v**e, but thank God she did not reach the e*******l college requirement number of 270. So, states like AZ, MI, and WI had a real say in this e******n, instead of just CA and NY. And, Hillary misjudged what was happening in those states.

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 14:13:00   #
.308 Remington S. R. Loc: Texas
 
To: lpnmajor...
As of yesterday on Breitbart
Popular v**e. Trump 62,972,226 Clinton. 62,277,750
E College. Trump 306 Clinton. 232
Just sayin'

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 14:20:48   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
reconreb wrote:
I keep hearing some say bernie would beat Trump , well that's a hypothetical that can not be proven so it means NADDA !!


It's also highly unlikely, Bernie base was primarily the Millenials ...Not enough to get anywhere, other than for them to think Bernery would have changed the world...

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 14:32:36   #
.308 Remington S. R. Loc: Texas
 
I don't believe Bernie can change his underware let alone the world. Just sayin'

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 14:34:43   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
.308 Remington S. R. wrote:
I don't believe Bernie can change his underware let alone the world. Just sayin'


Lolol, you may just be right about that!!

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 20:42:23   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
.308 Remington S. R. wrote:
To: lpnmajor...
As of yesterday on Breitbart
Popular v**e. Trump 62,972,226 Clinton. 62,277,750
E College. Trump 306 Clinton. 232
Just sayin'


You're exactly right. Clinton never came close to the popular v**e and even worse with the e*******l v**e. It all over the net. Yep....just sayin. : )

Reply
Nov 14, 2016 21:39:47   #
boofhead
 
Rivers wrote:
Why do we have two systems? If the e******n results were solely determined by the popular v**e, large populous states like CA and NY would control the outcome of the e******ns and small states would have essentially no say. Candidates would bypass small states and spend most their campaign time and money in those more populous states. And, since CA and NY are full of liberals you get an e******n result like we have today with Hillary getting the popular v**e, but thank God she did not reach the e*******l college requirement number of 270. So, states like AZ, MI, and WI had a real say in this e******n, instead of just CA and NY. And, Hillary misjudged what was happening in those states.
Why do we have two systems? If the e******n resul... (show quote)


And of course because it is in the Constitution. We are not, despite Hillary claiming it to be true, a Constitutional Democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic and the E*******l College is one way to assure that it remains so. Although we use democratic tools, we are NOT a democracy and I for one am very grateful for that. Imagine how bad things would be if we were!

Reply
Mar 13, 2017 05:38:45   #
Chameleon12
 
lpnmajor wrote:
In case you didn't see the actual e******n results, Clinton won the popular v**e by over 300,000, but lost the e*******l college, which included at least one e*****r that stated he would not v**e for Clinton - no matter what. I would be curious to see what the e******n results were in the State that e*****r is from. Why do we even have two separate e******ns anyway?


It isn't two separate e******ns. Not only that but, the popular v**e would prevent each state from having representation. Not only that but, Trump's claims of v***r f***d DO have merit. Not only that but, minorities are still what put Trump over the top. He wouldn't have won if he had received the same amount of minority support that Romney did.

Reply
Mar 13, 2017 05:41:30   #
Chameleon12
 
lindajoy wrote:
It's also highly unlikely, Bernie base was primarily the Millenials ...Not enough to get anywhere, other than for them to think Bernery would have changed the world...


If he had won the Democratic primaries, Bernie would likely have won the e******n. The DNC c***ted him, however, just like the RNC c***ted Ron Paul in 2012. Bernie did not have all of the scandals that hounded Hillary.

Reply
Mar 13, 2017 05:42:34   #
Chameleon12
 
boofhead wrote:
And of course because it is in the Constitution. We are not, despite Hillary claiming it to be true, a Constitutional Democracy. We are a Constitutional Republic and the E*******l College is one way to assure that it remains so. Although we use democratic tools, we are NOT a democracy and I for one am very grateful for that. Imagine how bad things would be if we were!


We are a Democratic Republic.

Reply
Mar 13, 2017 09:55:01   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
If he had won the Democratic primaries, Bernie would likely have won the e******n. The DNC c***ted him, however, just like the RNC c***ted Ron Paul in 2012. Bernie did not have all of the scandals that hounded Hillary.


I think how they planned to take Berney out was apparently Because Clinton feared him enough to go about their lying scheming way... Bernie never had a chance.. America isn't v****g in a Socialist for one thing and Hillary was always the NWO movement chosen..

You're right Bernie didn't have the scandals so they were creating them!!

I liked Ron Paul...

Reply
Mar 13, 2017 10:21:36   #
Sons of Liberty Loc: look behind you!
 
lindajoy wrote:
I think how they planned to take Berney out was apparently Because Clinton feared him enough to go about their lying scheming way... Bernie never had a chance.. America isn't v****g in a Socialist for one thing and Hillary was always the NWO movement chosen..

You're right Bernie didn't have the scandals so they were creating them!!

I like Ron Paul...


I like him and his son Rand. Hell, I liked Ross Perot when he was running.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.