No Hillary did not win the popular v**e
Nov 11, 2016 08:24:07 #
You cannot win something for which there is no contest. We do not have a popular v**e system we have an e*******l college system. If you take a bar exam you don't study medical books. You prepare for the contest you are entering. I am 100% sure if we had a popular v**e system all assets on both sides would have been distributed differently. Neither candidate would have spent a minute in New Hampshire. Trump would have campaigned in parts of California and New York to drive up the Middle Class white v**e. Hillary would have tried to drive up Dem v**er turnout in South Carolina. Campaign ads would have been shown in different places. Who would have won the popular v**e is UNKNOWN because we did not have a popular v**e contest
Nov 11, 2016 08:35:31 #
VladimirPee wrote:
You cannot win something for which there is no con... (show quote)
I'm really glad you pointed that out VP.....I wish some of the conservative pundits (what few there are) would explain this. It makes perfect sense. I was scratching my head....how could this person have won the popular v**e? Few went to her rallies.....no HRC signs anywhere.....no enthusiasm that I could see.....so my questions is....where were all these protestors when she was campaigning! They are coming out in large cities creating havoc.....yet where were they 1-2-3 months ago????? It's sad. But good post !!!
Nov 11, 2016 08:38:46 #
VladimirPee wrote:
You cannot win something for which there is no con... (show quote)
If the situation was reversed the Democrats would be saying the same thing you are stating and you would be complaining that T***p w*n the popular v**e and it was unfair for Hillary to be President when Trump got the most v**es. Each side has its own spin.
Nov 11, 2016 08:46:10 #
Its comparing apples to apples. For example I supported Trump but I knew in NJ he had no chance so I decided to v**e for Jill Stein. I disagree with her on most issues but I liked her personally and respected her clean campaign. With 5% she would have received matching funds and I like having strong 3rd parties. In a popular v**e e******n I would have v**ed for DT. The outcome of a popular v**e e******n is unknown because we did not have that type of contest
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the situation was reversed the Democrats would be saying the same thing you are stating and you would be complaining that T***p w*n the popular v**e and it was unfair for Hillary to be President when Trump got the most v**es. Each side has its own spin.
Nov 11, 2016 08:47:39 #
I agree with you on the spin but this is the second time for Dems. Bush-Gore if you recall and Dems are the ones crying out against the e*******l college system.
Liberty Tree wrote:
If the situation was reversed the Democrats would be saying the same thing you are stating and you would be complaining that T***p w*n the popular v**e and it was unfair for Hillary to be President when Trump got the most v**es. Each side has its own spin.
Nov 11, 2016 09:16:54 #
robmull
Loc: florida
VladimirPee wrote:
I agree with you on the spin but this is the second time for Dems. Bush-Gore if you recall and Dems are the ones crying out against the e*******l college system.
(D)ems cry out about anything they think they can get away with crying out about, Pee. Probably half the "thugs" now trying to reverse the POTUS decision didn't even know there WAS an e******n, and another half of the other half didn't v**e, and are just on the "red-diaper" Soros train acting as capitalistic anarchists; and if THAT'S possible, a liberal progressive will do it!!! What's that "crushing" noise I'm hearing??? GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP!!!
Nov 11, 2016 09:21:44 #
There is a petition from Change.Org asking E*******l v**ers to change their v**e. The odds of convincing 70 or 80 of them is absurd. Its a s**m to drive people to their website and donate
robmull wrote:
(D)ems cry out about anything they think they can get away with crying out about, Pee. Probably half the "thugs" now trying to reverse the POTUS decision didn't even know there WAS an e******n, and are just on the "red-diaper" Soros train acting as capitalistic anarchists; and if THAT'S possible, a liberal progressive will do it!!! What's that "crushing" noise I'm hearing??? GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP!!!
Nov 11, 2016 09:35:54 #
PZG1225 wrote:
I'm really glad you pointed that out VP.....I wish... (show quote)
Hillary Clinton won the Popular V**e because California V**ers gave her 2.2 million more V**es than Trump, and she's winning the overall Populous V**e by 212 Thousand with 92% of the overall Total V**es counted...
Nov 11, 2016 09:41:47 #
Wrong. There was no popular v**e contest. The contest held was e*******l college. That's like claiming Hillary had a Black Jack in a game of Poker.
JimMe wrote:
Hillary Clinton won the Popular V**e because California V**ers gave her 2.2 million more V**es than Trump, and she's winning the overall Populous V**e by 212 Thousand with 92% of the overall Total V**es counted...
Nov 11, 2016 11:49:46 #
As stated before: look up definition of "plurality"....approximately 5.2 million of the folks (v**ers)did not v**e for Trump or the Beast....
Nov 12, 2016 10:34:58 #
VladimirPee wrote:
Wrong. There was no popular v**e contest. The contest held was e*******l college. That's like claiming Hillary had a Black Jack in a game of Poker.
The E*******l V**e has always been the determining factor in USA P**********l-Vice P**********l E******ns...
But there has also been a look at the Popular V**e vs the E*******l V**e... Some folk want to see if the losing Candidate had that Black Jack even though it means nothing in the outcome...
Nov 12, 2016 13:09:40 #
Don't know if it would be legal or possible; however, IF the e*******l v**es were enumerated according to the popular v**e in each state. Would this not take away the crybaby attitude? THOUGHTS ANYONE?
Nov 12, 2016 15:08:26 #
But if we had no e*******l college there is no knowing what the popular v**e outcome would have been. Assets and Strategy would have been different
JimMe wrote:
The E*******l V**e has always been the determining factor in USA P**********l-Vice P**********l E******ns...
But there has also been a look at the Popular V**e vs the E*******l V**e... Some folk want to see if the losing Candidate had that Black Jack even though it means nothing in the outcome...
But there has also been a look at the Popular V**e vs the E*******l V**e... Some folk want to see if the losing Candidate had that Black Jack even though it means nothing in the outcome...
Nov 12, 2016 15:09:44 #
I don't think it would be helpful
fidelis wrote:
Don't know if it would be legal or possible; however, IF the e*******l v**es were enumerated according to the popular v**e in each state. Would this not take away the crybaby attitude? THOUGHTS ANYONE?
Nov 13, 2016 02:11:29 #
Scoop Henderson
Loc: The Rez, (I am from Egypt)
JimMe wrote:
Hillary Clinton won the Popular V**e because California V**ers gave her 2.2 million more V**es than Trump, and she's winning the overall Populous V**e by 212 Thousand with 92% of the overall Total V**es counted...
Whoa down. You do not know how many 'v**ers' are i******s.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.