bahmer

LIFE BEGINS AT FERTILIZATION, SCIENCE TEACHES
OCTOBER 31, 2016
ShareTweetPlusPin
It is the central question in the a******n debate: when does life begin?

Science teaches without reservation that life begins at fertilization (conception). It is a scientific fact that an organism exists after fertilization that did not exist before. This new organism has its own DNA distinct from the mother and father, meaning that it is a unique person. As the embryo grows, it develops a heartbeat (22 days after fertilization), its own circulatory system, and its own organs. From fertilization, it is a new organism that is alive and will continue to grow and develop as long as nutrition is provided and its life is not ended through violence or illness.

It is indisputably human, as it has human DNA.

The offspring of two members of a species is always the same type of creature as the parents. No two dogs will ever conceive and give birth to a cat; no fish egg will ever produce a snake. According to all the laws of nature, the preborn baby is human.

Scientific textbooks proclaim this fact. Keith L. Moore’s The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology (7th edition, Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003) states the following:

A zygote [fertilized egg] is the beginning of a new human being. Human development begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete … unites with a female gamete or oocyte … to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.

The term “zygote” is a scientific term for the new life that is created when the sperm and the egg combine. “Oocyte” is another term for the egg cell, the cell released by woman’s ovary which travels down the fallopian tube and is fertilized by the male sperm.

mcmlx

PPH knows this too.
Surely the doctors took high school biology.

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

Sarah Knapton, science editor
26 APRIL 2016 11:49AM

Human life begins in bright flash of light as a sperm meets an egg, scientists have shown for the first time, after capturing the astonishing ˜fireworks on film.

An explosion of tiny sparks erupts from the egg at the exact moment of conception.

To see the zinc radiate out in a burst from each human egg was breathtaking.
Professor Teresa Woodruff, Northwestern University

It is an incredible spectacle, highlighting the very moment that a new life begins.

¨Let there be light.¨ ¨Let there be life.¨

bahmer

We can now challenge Roe vs. Wade we now know that it is not a fetus but a human being that is being aborted and k**led. We can't keep sweeping this under the rug so to speak but have to address this head on and determine at what age does a child have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and when they are covered under the law as a living human being.

Homestead

The question is, has any human-being ever existed, without first being conceived and that includes test tube babies?

mcmlx

Good luck trying to persuade the supreme Court to do the right thing.

mcmlx

Adam and Eve.

Homestead

Well, then, I guess Adam and Eve could have been aborted and God would have been present, so you could argue with him about it.

mcmlx

Your question was has any human-being existed without being conceived.
I thought you meant physically, by sperm and egg.
Your response is so strange.
God created man from the dust of the earth.
Or do you mean abort, as in a mission?
I'm curious as to what your point is.

Homestead

The point is, does man have an unalienable right to life or not.

Is his life God given or not.

Does man have the right to destroy life or not?

Sperm and egg was God's idea. It continues that which he created and he created them for the purpose of continuing what he created.

If we have a right to stop his creations of conception, then why wouldn't we have the right to stop the first two. After all, they started this controversy.

At any rate, God was there with the first two, so maybe he'd have something to say about destroying that which he created.

And I used the word abort, because people use it instead of what their actually doing which is murder.

Abort is just a polite term used to avoid saying murder which would answer the question before it was asked.

Instead of the question, "Does a woman have the right to abort her child?"

The question should be, "Does a woman have the right to murder her child."

A******n is just the method used.

mcmlx

If you check my record, I am one of the most pro-life anti-a******n posters here.

Man does have the right to life.
His right is absolutely GOD given.
However, GOD gave man free choice, even though I do not believe that gives someone the right to end a life, murdering deliberately.
I firmly know, without a doubt that human life begins at conception.
That doesn't change the fact that other people will spit in GOD'S face and k**l innocents.
Abort is something NASA does to missions. I ALWAYS use the term murder
when speaking of what others want to call "a******n ".