One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Trump's Claims that the media is behind Hillary, is laughable.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Oct 23, 2016 21:12:17   #
mongo Loc: TEXAS
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Sorry this is long, sorry it is vile language. This is something every American should know.

Hillary Clinton: “f***ing Jew bastard” [The Times, London] and other Clinton quotes.
by MR. CHARRINGTON on JUNE 1, 2007
Hillary Clinton: “Fucking Jew bastard.”
(From Jerry Oppenheimer in his book State of the Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton -2000.)

There’s no doubt, Hillary Clinton called Paul Fray a “fucking Jew bastard.” If there were the slightest doubt, you can bet that vicious Hillary would have sicced her amoral $450-an-hour shyster David Kendall on every author, publication and news service that reported her anti-Semitic slur, regardless of how veiled and coy the media were about her vile outburst.

Following is a sampling of how the media reported “fucking Jew bastard.” Note the euphemized fucking and its suppression, the euphamized bastard, as well as the various uninformative paraphrases and verbal maneuvers.

The quotations are arranged from the most to the least complete reporting of Hillary’s exact and complete pottymouthishness.

TIME magazine wins the Weasel Prize for keeping the reader in the dark about what was actually said.

The Associated Press is runner-up for euphemizing bastard and suppressing fucking.

United Press International wins third place for euphemizing all words but “Jew”.

Special prize goes to CBS Radio News for telling its listeners that Hillary merely “used rough language” and an unspecified “anti-Semitic slur”.

Like what, CBS? Kike? Hebe? Christ-k**ler?

“f***ing Jew bastard” [The Times (London), 18 July 2000]
“f—–g Jew bastard” [New York Daily News, 17 July 2000]
“f****** Jew bastard” [The Times (London), 16 July 2000]
“f—– Jew b——” [UPI, 17 July 2000; euphemized fucking is one hyphen short]
“Jew bastard” [Reuters, 10, 16, 17 July 2000]
“Jew bastard” [The Washington Post, 18 July 2000]
“Jew bastard” [New York Daily News, 18 July 2000]
“Jew b——” [AP, 16 July 2000]
“an obscenity-laced, anti-Semitic slur” [AP, 19 July 2000]
“an anti-Semitic obscenity” [AP and St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 26 July 2000]
“uttered an anti-Jewish slur” [Reuters, 16 July 2000]
“made an anti-Jewish remark” [TIME, 24 July 2000, p. 64]
“used rough language” and an “anti-Semitic slur.” [CBS Radio News, 16 July 2000]
“Where is the G-damn f**king f**g? I want the G-damn f**king f**g up every f**king morning at f**king sunrise.”

(From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 – Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day, 1991).

The troopers were also objects of Hillary’s wrath.

Patterson recalled the early morning of Labor Day in 1991, when Hillary came out of the mansion, got in her car, and drove off. Within a minute or so of leaving the gate, her aging blue Cutlass swung violently around and came charging back onto the grounds, tires squealing in the dust.

“I thought something was terribly wrong, so I rushed out to her. And she screamed, ‘Where is the goddamn f — -ing f**g?’ It was early and we hadn’t raised the f**g yet. And she said, ‘I want the goddamn f — -ing f**g up every f — -ing morning at f — -ing sunrise.’”

“F**k off! It’s enough that I have to see you s**t-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.”

(From the book “American Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 -

[Hillary] also resented [the state troopers'] constant presence and the loss of privacy that entailed. At times, a simple “Good morning, Mrs. Clinton” could provoke an attack.

“Fuck off!” she would bark. “It’s enough that I have to see you s**t-kickers every day. I’m not going to talk to you, too. Just do your goddamn job and keep your mouth shut.”

“You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!”

(From the book “Inside” by Joseph Califano, p. 213 – Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer.)

On July 24, 1970, at 10 A.M., the hearings were held in the Senate Caucus Room in the Russell Building, the scene of many great Senate confrontations, include the McNamara muzzling-the-military hearings, which I had lawyered almost ten years earlier.

As [Paul] Austin, [Coca-Cola food division head] Luke Smith, and I entered the Caucus Room on that steamy Washington morning, it was so jammed with spectators that many were standing and sitting on the floor. A large number were student interns working on the Hill that summer, angry about Nixon’s bombing Cambodia, dispirited about the four students k**led at Kent State University that May.

Many in that room had been among the 100,000 young Americans who had earlier that summer clogged the city to protest the war. Anti-establishment fervor, at a fever pitch that July, was palpable in the hearing room.

About half way down the aisle, a young woman with dark hair and thick-rimmed glasses abruptly came in front of me and said, “You sold out, you motherfucker, you sold out!” I kept walking, pretending to ignore her.

Two and a half years later, at 11:00 A.M. on Monday March 19, 1973, that same young woman walked into my office at Williams, Connolly & Califano for a job interview. It was Hillary Rodham, who was graduating from Yale Law School later that year.

Neither of us mentioned the incident in the Senate Caucus Room. I offered her a job, but she decided to go to Arkansas rather than practice law in Washington.

“If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!”

(From the book “The First Partner” p. 259 – Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.)

One [Secret Service] agent, who politely explained to Mrs. Clinton that his duties did not include toting suitcases from their airplane to their limo, was shocked when she replied, “If you want to remain on this detail,” get your fucking ass over here and grab those bags.”

“Get f**ked! Get the f**k out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!”

(This quote is taken from (the 1998 edition of) former FBI agent Gary Aldrich’s 1996 book, Unlimited Access p89).

The passage in which it appears is part of a section detailing President Clinton’s supposed habit of sneaking out of the White House to evade his Secret Service detail while on his way to trysts at a nearby hotel and is attributed to an unnamed source identified as “a senior law enforcement officer with more than twenty years’ service in a federal agency:

“My source used the term the first family rather than simply the president because he says Hillary Clinton is as bad as the president. She has told her Secret Service Protective Detail agents in public to, “Stay the f–k back, stay the f–k away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else!”

When the agents have tried to explain to the first lady that they cannot effectively guard her if they must remain so far away, her reply is, “Just f–king do as I say, okay?”

“Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!

(From the book “Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72 – a 2003 book by Air Force Lt. Colonel Robert Patterson (who served as a military aide to President Clinton for two years):

On a similar trip, as we lifted off a helicopter pad in Marine One en route to Air Force One for the journey home, Hillary suddenly shouted, “Put this back on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo.”

By this time, however, Marine One was safely scooting to an awaiting 747. The required support for even a helicopter flight was involved and extensive. The Secret Service, White House Communications Agency and administration staff were pulling down communications lines, lifting barricades and driving off in vehicles.

“Ma’am,” my fellow military aide responded, “we can’t safely do that.”

“I need my sunglasses. We need to go back!”

The onboard Secret Service agent chimed in, “Yes, ma’am, the milaide is correct. That wouldn’t be wise.” She acquiesced, but not without obvious disdain in her eyes.

“Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can’t f**k her here!!”

(From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 243 – This is also another quote that originated with David Brock’s January 1994 American Spectator article and was taken from information provided by Arkansas state trooper Larry Patterson:

“Come on Bill, put your dick up. You can’t f–k her here”.

When [Bill] Clinton spent an inordinate amount of time speaking with an attractive woman at a public event — apparently a common occurrence — several troopers said they have heard Hillary complain bitterly. “She would say, Come on Bill, put your dick up. You can’t f–k her here,” as Patterson remembered the unforgettable phrasing.

“We just can’t trust the American people to make those types of choices…. Government has to make those choices for people”.

(This quote comes from a conversation relayed by Rep. Dennis Hastert of Illinois, then the chairman of the Republicans’ House task force on health care, at a 1993 meeting with Hillary Clinton, as reported in David Brock’s The Seduction of Hillary Rodham):

Full

Dennis Hastert … began meeting in February [1993] with Clinton administration officials as part of an effort to craft a bipartisan approach to [health care] reform.

One evening in June 1993, a group of Republican congressmen, including Hastert, met with Hillary at the Alexandria home of Republican Representative John Kaisch of Ohio.

One of Hastert’s ideas under discussion that night would have allowed employers the option of establishing medical savings accounts for their employees as an alternative to a government-managed system.

Under Hastert’s plan, employers would put the money they were willing to spend into tax-deferred accounts. Employees would be encouraged to buy high-deductible catastrophic care policies and pay for rudimentary services with the remainder of the money. At the end of the year, the unused funds could be rolled over tax-free into the next year and, like an IRA, be withdrawn at retirement.

Hastert and other advocates believed that as people shopped around for insurance and spent their own money to purchase care, costs would be controlled and competition enhanced.

But, critics said the accounts would benefit healthier people who would spend less than what employers contributed, and hurt the poor, who might pay higher premiums as healthier and wealthier people formed their own insurance purchasing pools.

Hastert soon concluded that there was little common ground on which to negotiate with the administration.

“I guess the straw on the camel’s back was a meeting that I had one evening with Mrs. Clinton,”

Hastert recalled:

I mentioned … to the first lady about medical savings accounts and just right away she said, “We can’t do that.”

And I said, “Well, why?”

And she said, “Well, there’s two reasons.”

And I said, “Well, what are they?”

[And she said] “The first reason is with the medical savings account, people have to act on their own and make their own decisions about health care. And they have to make sure that they get the inoculations and the preventative care that they need, and we just think that people will skip too much because in a medical savings account if you don’t spend it, you get to keep it or you can … accumulate it in a health care account.”
Sorry this is long, sorry it is vile language. Th... (show quote)


What a real lady...hmmm!

SEMPER FI

Reply
Oct 23, 2016 21:19:58   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Sonny Magoo wrote:
The media and Hollywood are morally bankrupt and corrupt,with many America (WASP) h**ers in charge. If the t***h were known about both...the 3rd party may have a chance...otherwise Trump is the best choice for real change in Washington. The media take on things like a******n and the sexual revolution, make it so obvious as to their worldview and the slant that goes with it.




Agreed, we that have eyes to see, see the stronghold that has taken over virtually every source, tv,radio, print, schools and universities advancing the godless worldly views and agendas. America a nation founded on God was the last society turning from God, morals, ethics, and without Hillary would never had been close to being nominated.

Reply
Oct 23, 2016 22:37:02   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
"Do you believe Hillary would lose by a landslide if the media reported t***hful and balanced on both Hillary and Trump?"
Yes.
The shadow government (PTB) and Democrats rely on biased propaganda.
America is in a tail spin, but how many are aware of that.
The MSM keeps the sheeple grazing.


jack sequim wa wrote:
In fact it is not only laughable, but a sorry bit of evidence how debauchery has entered our society as an acceptable norm. How many Americans only keep tuned to the liberal lying media machine, forming their decisions and shrouding hillary with a wall of protection from her criminal 30+year journey of politics, winning through deception and cheered by the knowing l*****t.

The Center for Public Integrity's mission is "To serve democracy by revealing abuses of power, corruption and betrayal of public trust by powerful public and private institutions, using the tools of investigative journalism." It p***es itself as being one of the nations oldest and largest nonpartisan, non-profit Pulitzer Prize winning investigative news organizations. So when it reveals that the vast majority of journalists contributing to the p**********l e******n are supporting Democrat Hillary Clinton, one has to look at the gravity of what is being reported. The Center reports some 430 people who work in journalism have donated about $382,000 to Clinton-that's 96% of all the money donated to both candidates from journalists.

The results are as would be expected. One example, reported by the Center says, "New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking p**********l nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an "ugly and xenophobic campaign." What Nussbaum didn't disclose in her dispatches: she contributed $250 to Democrat Hillary Clinton in April." While $250 doesn't sound like much, it is a statement of tremendous import. In my days of reporting, my personal policy was that I would never show any kind of bias toward a candidate by contributing to the campaign or becoming too cozy with members of a campaign staff.

We can see that isn't the case in this e******n. Even Trump mentioned in the last debate that it was three to one against him, a reference to how the so-called "impartial moderators" were favoring Clinton. This comes as no surprise, however, as even a May 2015 poll by Rasmussen suggested that the majority of Americans expect biased coverage. Rasmussen reported, "When it comes to the 2016 p**********l campaign, only 23% believe most reporters will try to offer unbiased coverage. Fifty-nine percent (59%) think that coverage will be slanted instead, with 36% who say most reporters will try to help Hillary Clinton during the campaign and 23% who say they will try to hurt her bid for the White House instead."

There is an old adage that covers just about anything: Follow the money. The money says that journalists favor Clinton by some 96% of the donations they give. And these are just the ones who do not see it as a conflict of interest to give to a political candidate. Those polled thought the media would be slanted, and the contributions by journalists prove it. They wouldn't be giving to Clinton if they didn't support her. That automatically biases anything they would report. As Isaiah 59:14 says, "And justice is turned back, and righteousness stands afar off: for t***h is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter." T***h, indeed, has fallen in the street, and these so-called "journalists" don't even try to hide their iniquity.

Do you believe hillary would lose by a landslide if the media reported t***hful and balanced on both hillary and Trump?
In fact it is not only laughable, but a sorry bit... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2016 22:54:32   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
mongo wrote:
Actually jack, he is winning, the media just refuses to give honest numbers of their polls. Look around on the web, many are in line for Trump.

SEMPER FI



Donald Trump is holding a slight lead on Hillary Clinton 43 to 41 percent in the four-way race, according to the Sunday morning’s IBD/TIPP p**********l tracking poll. Trump also holds nearly a one-point lead in the two-way race in the survey.
The results when third-party candidates, Libertarian Gary Johnson and the Green Party’s Jill Stein are included  break down as:
Trump 42.6 percent
Clinton 40.8 percent
Johnson 7.2 percent
Stein 3.3 percent

Investor's Business Daily (IBD) and TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence (TIPP) poll boasts it has been the most accurate among 11 national polls in the past three p**********l e******ns. 


The poll surveyed 783 likely v**ers, 282 of which were Democrats, 226 Republicans and 259 independents.


 

Reply
Oct 23, 2016 23:09:26   #
Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Sorry this is long, sorry it is vile language. This is something every American should know.

Hillary Clinton: “f***ing Jew bastard” [The Times, London] and other Clinton quotes.
by MR. CHARRINGTON on JUNE 1, 2007
Hillary Clinton: “Fucking Jew bastard.”
(From Jerry Oppenheimer in his book State of the Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton -2000.)

There’s no doubt, Hillary Clinton called Paul Fray a “fucking Jew bastard.” If there were the slightest doubt, you can bet that vicious Hillary would have sicced her amoral $450-an-hour shyster David Kendall on every author, publication and news service that reported her anti-Semitic slur, regardless of how veiled and coy the media were about her vile outburst.

Following is a sampling of how the media reported “fucking Jew bastard.” Note the euphemized fucking and its suppression, the euphamized bastard, as well as the various uninformative paraphrases and verbal maneuvers.

The quotations are arranged from the most to the least complete reporting of Hillary’s exact and complete pottymouthishness.

TIME magazine wins the Weasel Prize for keeping the reader in the dark about what was actually said.

The Associated Press is runner-up for euphemizing bastard and suppressing fucking.

United Press International wins third place for euphemizing all words but “Jew”.

Special prize goes to CBS Radio News for telling its listeners that Hillary merely “used rough language” and an unspecified “anti-Semitic slur”.

Like what, CBS? Kike? Hebe? Christ-k**ler?

“f***ing Jew bastard” [The Times (London), 18 July 2000]
“f—–g Jew bastard” [New York Daily News, 17 July 2000]
“f****** Jew bastard” [The Times (London), 16 July 2000]
“f—– Jew b——” [UPI, 17 July 2000; euphemized fucking is one hyphen short]
“Jew bastard” [Reuters, 10, 16, 17 July 2000]
“Jew bastard” [The Washington Post, 18 July 2000]
“Jew bastard” [New York Daily News, 18 July 2000]
“Jew b——” [AP, 16 July 2000]
“an obscenity-laced, anti-Semitic slur” [AP, 19 July 2000]
“an anti-Semitic obscenity” [AP and St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 26 July 2000]
“uttered an anti-Jewish slur” [Reuters, 16 July 2000]
“made an anti-Jewish remark” [TIME, 24 July 2000, p. 64]
“used rough language” and an “anti-Semitic slur.” [CBS Radio News, 16 July 2000]
“Where is the G-damn f**king f**g? I want the G-damn f**king f**g up every f**king morning at f**king sunrise.”

(From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 – Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day, 1991).

The troopers were also objects of Hillary’s wrath.

Patterson recalled the early morning of Labor Day in 1991, when Hillary came out of the mansion, got in her car, and drove off. Within a minute or so of leaving the gate, her aging blue Cutlass swung violently around and came charging back onto the grounds, tires squealing in the dust.

“I thought something was terribly wrong, so I rushed out to her. And she screamed, ‘Where is the goddamn f — -ing f**g?’ It was early and we hadn’t raised the f**g yet. And she said, ‘I want the goddamn f — -ing f**g up every f — -ing morning at f — -ing sunrise.’”

“F**k off! It’s enough that I have to see you s**t-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.”

(From the book “American Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 -

[Hillary] also resented [the state troopers'] constant presence and the loss of privacy that entailed. At times, a simple “Good morning, Mrs. Clinton” could provoke an attack.

“Fuck off!” she would bark. “It’s enough that I have to see you s**t-kickers every day. I’m not going to talk to you, too. Just do your goddamn job and keep your mouth shut.”

“You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!”

(From the book “Inside” by Joseph Califano, p. 213 – Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer.)

On July 24, 1970, at 10 A.M., the hearings were held in the Senate Caucus Room in the Russell Building, the scene of many great Senate confrontations, include the McNamara muzzling-the-military hearings, which I had lawyered almost ten years earlier.

As [Paul] Austin, [Coca-Cola food division head] Luke Smith, and I entered the Caucus Room on that steamy Washington morning, it was so jammed with spectators that many were standing and sitting on the floor. A large number were student interns working on the Hill that summer, angry about Nixon’s bombing Cambodia, dispirited about the four students k**led at Kent State University that May.

Many in that room had been among the 100,000 young Americans who had earlier that summer clogged the city to protest the war. Anti-establishment fervor, at a fever pitch that July, was palpable in the hearing room.

About half way down the aisle, a young woman with dark hair and thick-rimmed glasses abruptly came in front of me and said, “You sold out, you motherfucker, you sold out!” I kept walking, pretending to ignore her.

Two and a half years later, at 11:00 A.M. on Monday March 19, 1973, that same young woman walked into my office at Williams, Connolly & Califano for a job interview. It was Hillary Rodham, who was graduating from Yale Law School later that year.

Neither of us mentioned the incident in the Senate Caucus Room. I offered her a job, but she decided to go to Arkansas rather than practice law in Washington.

“If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!”

(From the book “The First Partner” p. 259 – Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.)

One [Secret Service] agent, who politely explained to Mrs. Clinton that his duties did not include toting suitcases from their airplane to their limo, was shocked when she replied, “If you want to remain on this detail,” get your fucking ass over here and grab those bags.”

“Get f**ked! Get the f**k out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!”

(This quote is taken from (the 1998 edition of) former FBI agent Gary Aldrich’s 1996 book, Unlimited Access p89).

The passage in which it appears is part of a section detailing President Clinton’s supposed habit of sneaking out of the White House to evade his Secret Service detail while on his way to trysts at a nearby hotel and is attributed to an unnamed source identified as “a senior law enforcement officer with more than twenty years’ service in a federal agency:

“My source used the term the first family rather than simply the president because he says Hillary Clinton is as bad as the president. She has told her Secret Service Protective Detail agents in public to, “Stay the f–k back, stay the f–k away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else!”

When the agents have tried to explain to the first lady that they cannot effectively guard her if they must remain so far away, her reply is, “Just f–king do as I say, okay?”

“Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!

(From the book “Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72 – a 2003 book by Air Force Lt. Colonel Robert Patterson (who served as a military aide to President Clinton for two years):

On a similar trip, as we lifted off a helicopter pad in Marine One en route to Air Force One for the journey home, Hillary suddenly shouted, “Put this back on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo.”

By this time, however, Marine One was safely scooting to an awaiting 747. The required support for even a helicopter flight was involved and extensive. The Secret Service, White House Communications Agency and administration staff were pulling down communications lines, lifting barricades and driving off in vehicles.

“Ma’am,” my fellow military aide responded, “we can’t safely do that.”

“I need my sunglasses. We need to go back!”

The onboard Secret Service agent chimed in, “Yes, ma’am, the milaide is correct. That wouldn’t be wise.” She acquiesced, but not without obvious disdain in her eyes.

“Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can’t f**k her here!!”

(From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 243 – This is also another quote that originated with David Brock’s January 1994 American Spectator article and was taken from information provided by Arkansas state trooper Larry Patterson:

“Come on Bill, put your dick up. You can’t f–k her here”.

When [Bill] Clinton spent an inordinate amount of time speaking with an attractive woman at a public event — apparently a common occurrence — several troopers said they have heard Hillary complain bitterly. “She would say, Come on Bill, put your dick up. You can’t f–k her here,” as Patterson remembered the unforgettable phrasing.

“We just can’t trust the American people to make those types of choices…. Government has to make those choices for people”.

(This quote comes from a conversation relayed by Rep. Dennis Hastert of Illinois, then the chairman of the Republicans’ House task force on health care, at a 1993 meeting with Hillary Clinton, as reported in David Brock’s The Seduction of Hillary Rodham):

Full

Dennis Hastert … began meeting in February [1993] with Clinton administration officials as part of an effort to craft a bipartisan approach to [health care] reform.

One evening in June 1993, a group of Republican congressmen, including Hastert, met with Hillary at the Alexandria home of Republican Representative John Kaisch of Ohio.

One of Hastert’s ideas under discussion that night would have allowed employers the option of establishing medical savings accounts for their employees as an alternative to a government-managed system.

Under Hastert’s plan, employers would put the money they were willing to spend into tax-deferred accounts. Employees would be encouraged to buy high-deductible catastrophic care policies and pay for rudimentary services with the remainder of the money. At the end of the year, the unused funds could be rolled over tax-free into the next year and, like an IRA, be withdrawn at retirement.

Hastert and other advocates believed that as people shopped around for insurance and spent their own money to purchase care, costs would be controlled and competition enhanced.

But, critics said the accounts would benefit healthier people who would spend less than what employers contributed, and hurt the poor, who might pay higher premiums as healthier and wealthier people formed their own insurance purchasing pools.

Hastert soon concluded that there was little common ground on which to negotiate with the administration.

“I guess the straw on the camel’s back was a meeting that I had one evening with Mrs. Clinton,”

Hastert recalled:

I mentioned … to the first lady about medical savings accounts and just right away she said, “We can’t do that.”

And I said, “Well, why?”

And she said, “Well, there’s two reasons.”

And I said, “Well, what are they?”

[And she said] “The first reason is with the medical savings account, people have to act on their own and make their own decisions about health care. And they have to make sure that they get the inoculations and the preventative care that they need, and we just think that people will skip too much because in a medical savings account if you don’t spend it, you get to keep it or you can … accumulate it in a health care account.”
Sorry this is long, sorry it is vile language. Th... (show quote)


But, but,....Trump said a bad thing once so that's just as bad.....isn't it???

Reply
Oct 23, 2016 23:18:36   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Docadhoc wrote:
But, but,....Trump said a bad thing once so that's just as bad.....isn't it???


Awful! Just awful! First my ears started bleeding, then I got sick. I couldn't sleep for days because of the nightmares! I heard it over and over in my head. Now I'm seeing a psychiatrist, but don't worry! Obamacare is paying for it.

Reply
Oct 24, 2016 14:52:08   #
donald41 Loc: puyallup Wa
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
In fact it is not only laughable, but a sorry bit of evidence how debauchery has entered our society as an acceptable norm. How many Americans only keep tuned to the liberal lying media machine, forming their decisions and shrouding hillary with a wall of protection from her criminal 30+year journey of politics, winning through deception and cheered by the knowing l*****t.

The Center for Public Integrity's mission is "To serve democracy by revealing abuses of power, corruption and betrayal of public trust by powerful public and private institutions, using the tools of investigative journalism." It p***es itself as being one of the nations oldest and largest nonpartisan, non-profit Pulitzer Prize winning investigative news organizations. So when it reveals that the vast majority of journalists contributing to the p**********l e******n are supporting Democrat Hillary Clinton, one has to look at the gravity of what is being reported. The Center reports some 430 people who work in journalism have donated about $382,000 to Clinton-that's 96% of all the money donated to both candidates from journalists.

The results are as would be expected. One example, reported by the Center says, "New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking p**********l nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an "ugly and xenophobic campaign." What Nussbaum didn't disclose in her dispatches: she contributed $250 to Democrat Hillary Clinton in April." While $250 doesn't sound like much, it is a statement of tremendous import. In my days of reporting, my personal policy was that I would never show any kind of bias toward a candidate by contributing to the campaign or becoming too cozy with members of a campaign staff.

We can see that isn't the case in this e******n. Even Trump mentioned in the last debate that it was three to one against him, a reference to how the so-called "impartial moderators" were favoring Clinton. This comes as no surprise, however, as even a May 2015 poll by Rasmussen suggested that the majority of Americans expect biased coverage. Rasmussen reported, "When it comes to the 2016 p**********l campaign, only 23% believe most reporters will try to offer unbiased coverage. Fifty-nine percent (59%) think that coverage will be slanted instead, with 36% who say most reporters will try to help Hillary Clinton during the campaign and 23% who say they will try to hurt her bid for the White House instead."

There is an old adage that covers just about anything: Follow the money. The money says that journalists favor Clinton by some 96% of the donations they give. And these are just the ones who do not see it as a conflict of interest to give to a political candidate. Those polled thought the media would be slanted, and the contributions by journalists prove it. They wouldn't be giving to Clinton if they didn't support her. That automatically biases anything they would report. As Isaiah 59:14 says, "And justice is turned back, and righteousness stands afar off: for t***h is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter." T***h, indeed, has fallen in the street, and these so-called "journalists" don't even try to hide their iniquity.

Do you believe hillary would lose by a landslide if the media reported t***hful and balanced on both hillary and Trump?
In fact it is not only laughable, but a sorry bit... (show quote)
She would go down in flames.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.