One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Conservatives claim r****d? 8 times the E******ns were challenged!!
Oct 22, 2016 19:28:50   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Oh how the l*****t scream when conservatives challenge an e******n, yet how the l*****t media has short memory of the eight e******ns challenged by liberals.
How the l*****t media never brings up the v****g machines owned by George Soros that were fixed, or the dead v**ers, illegal v**er, and 100% wins that are mathematically impossible?

Unlike some recent post that make claims without posting a source, I will post a source. And my challenge is not the source, but what the source claims and it's factual t***h. Something l*****t are unable to challenge. While little trust can be placed in majority of most all sources, it rest upon us to test the claims of the source, right?

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/19/8-times-liberals-claimed-e******n-stolen-r****d/

As evidenced in the latest media coverage, CNN, ABC,NBC, MSN, and others, they are a den of liars.It started with l*****t in chief Clinton saying "that's horrifying." The media analysts at the end of the debate were beside themselves that a p**********l candidate may not accept the results of the e******n and in doing so unify the country. Let's get real. The most logical reason they are collectively horrified is that contesting the e******n if it appears to be r****d will expose the Democratic Party's system of r*****g e******ns. Precincts v****g over 100% for a candidate, dead people, i*****l a***ns, felons are v****g. They v**e Democratic. They sway e******ns. Not to mention the v****g machines owned by a George Soros affiliated company. Every American should be questioning the veracity and results of the e******n.

Let us recall the last p**********l e******n where a candidate wouldn't accept the results. That would be Al Gore, a Democrat, who conceded then called to retract his concession. He contested the e******n all the way to the Supreme Court, which declared George W Bush the winner some 34 days after the e******n. Here we have a perfect case of how c*******ts work-they accuse others of doing the deed they did then propagandize it as if it was the worst act of mankind. When Al Gore would not accept the results of the e******n, it was the l*****ts, including the news media, who thought the Gore challenge was the right thing to do. Imagine black robed oligarchs choosing our president. It happened.

But to another point that is lost in this frenzy-Trump said of Clinton and the e******n, "She's guilty of a very serious crime. She should not be allowed to run. And just in that respect, I say it is r****d." Clinton handled our nation's secrets carelessly-a crime for which many have gone to jail. The law also states that if one is found to have done this, they cannot hold a public office. After her husband Bill Clinton met with Democratic Attorney General Loretta Lynch in the back of her jet for a half an hour, the FBI, which is under Lynch's authority, said no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Clinton. This is a travesty. The final debate exposed much. Proverbs 12:26 says, "The righteous should choose his friends carefully, For the way of the wicked leads them astray." The same should apply to leaders.

Reply
Oct 22, 2016 20:01:49   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Oh how the l*****t scream when conservatives challenge an e******n, yet how the l*****t media has short memory of the eight e******ns challenged by liberals.
How the l*****t media never brings up the v****g machines owned by George Soros that were fixed, or the dead v**ers, illegal v**er, and 100% wins that are mathematically impossible?

Unlike some recent post that make claims without posting a source, I will post a source. And my challenge is not the source, but what the source claims and it's factual t***h. Something l*****t are unable to challenge. While little trust can be placed in majority of most all sources, it rest upon us to test the claims of the source, right?

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/19/8-times-liberals-claimed-e******n-stolen-r****d/

As evidenced in the latest media coverage, CNN, ABC,NBC, MSN, and others, they are a den of liars.It started with l*****t in chief Clinton saying "that's horrifying." The media analysts at the end of the debate were beside themselves that a p**********l candidate may not accept the results of the e******n and in doing so unify the country. Let's get real. The most logical reason they are collectively horrified is that contesting the e******n if it appears to be r****d will expose the Democratic Party's system of r*****g e******ns. Precincts v****g over 100% for a candidate, dead people, i*****l a***ns, felons are v****g. They v**e Democratic. They sway e******ns. Not to mention the v****g machines owned by a George Soros affiliated company. Every American should be questioning the veracity and results of the e******n.

Let us recall the last p**********l e******n where a candidate wouldn't accept the results. That would be Al Gore, a Democrat, who conceded then called to retract his concession. He contested the e******n all the way to the Supreme Court, which declared George W Bush the winner some 34 days after the e******n. Here we have a perfect case of how c*******ts work-they accuse others of doing the deed they did then propagandize it as if it was the worst act of mankind. When Al Gore would not accept the results of the e******n, it was the l*****ts, including the news media, who thought the Gore challenge was the right thing to do. Imagine black robed oligarchs choosing our president. It happened.

But to another point that is lost in this frenzy-Trump said of Clinton and the e******n, "She's guilty of a very serious crime. She should not be allowed to run. And just in that respect, I say it is r****d." Clinton handled our nation's secrets carelessly-a crime for which many have gone to jail. The law also states that if one is found to have done this, they cannot hold a public office. After her husband Bill Clinton met with Democratic Attorney General Loretta Lynch in the back of her jet for a half an hour, the FBI, which is under Lynch's authority, said no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Clinton. This is a travesty. The final debate exposed much. Proverbs 12:26 says, "The righteous should choose his friends carefully, For the way of the wicked leads them astray." The same should apply to leaders.
Oh how the l*****t scream when conservatives chall... (show quote)





Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.