One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Something very powerful at work
Page 1 of 9 next> last>>
Oct 13, 2016 15:40:59   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Since when does a FBI official make a decision to indict or not to indict? They investigate, analyse and yield their findings to prosecutors. They do NOT make decisions regarding indictment. But Comey got to?

BIL worked his magic on this one. He called in a few favors, for sure. Manipulated some key people.

Wow.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 15:55:51   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
The Clintons must have some dirt on Comey. Some thing sure stinks.

nwtk2007 wrote:
Since when does a FBI official make a decision to indict or not to indict? They investigate, analyse and yield their findings to prosecutors. They do NOT make decisions regarding indictment. But Comey got to?

BIL worked his magic on this one. He called in a few favors, for sure. Manipulated some key people.

Wow.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 15:58:18   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Since when does a FBI official make a decision to indict or not to indict? They investigate, analyse and yield their findings to prosecutors. They do NOT make decisions regarding indictment. But Comey got to?

BIL worked his magic on this one. He called in a few favors, for sure. Manipulated some key people.

Wow.


He defended a position, which was...

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

He didn't tell the D of J to not prosecute, just that no evidence to move forward. He made a recommendation. Enough money has already been spent. They should convict her staff, her lawyer...thus, next time she won't have anyone to come to her rescue.


Read in entirety:
http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2016 15:59:43   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
JMHO wrote:
The Clintons must have some dirt on Comey. Some thing sure stinks.


They have dirt on everyone. She just pulls out her little black book and names, names and everyone goes home to erase their own servers...isn't it obvious?

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:01:24   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
Leavenworth is full of people who did a lot less in mishandling classified material. She also lied. She should have been indicted.

Dummy Boy wrote:
He defended a position, which was...

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

He didn't tell the D of J to not prosecute, just that no evidence to move forward. He made a recommendation. Enough money has already been spent. They should convict her staff, her lawyer...thus, next time she won't have anyone to come to her rescue.


Read in entirety:
http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
He defended a position, which was... br br b Alt... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:06:47   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
Dummy Boy wrote:
He defended a position, which was...

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

He didn't tell the D of J to not prosecute, just that no evidence to move forward. He made a recommendation. Enough money has already been spent. They should convict her staff, her lawyer...thus, next time she won't have anyone to come to her rescue.


Read in entirety:
http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
He defended a position, which was... br br b Alt... (show quote)


If it was all above board, why are there so many pissed off FBI career types? They think there was plenty there for an indictment.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:16:02   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Very little money would have been spent if she had come clean on day one but she knew damn well she had broken the law!



Dummy Boy wrote:
He defended a position, which was...

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

He didn't tell the D of J to not prosecute, just that no evidence to move forward. He made a recommendation. Enough money has already been spent. They should convict her staff, her lawyer...thus, next time she won't have anyone to come to her rescue.


Read in entirety:
http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
He defended a position, which was... br br b Alt... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:17:16   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
JMHO wrote:
The Clintons must have some dirt on Comey. Some thing sure stinks.


Comey was on another investigation into a s**m Hillary and bill were part of before he became president everyone went to prison but bill and hillary. shortly after he began working in the foundation.as for lynch she was part of the law firm that took care of the clintons this law firm was also the ones who did the patent on the now famous program that wiped hillarys computer. coincidence I think not they were on their pay roll then and still are.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:21:27   #
bggamers Loc: georgia
 
bggamers wrote:
Comey was on another investigation into a s**m Hillary and bill were part of before he became president everyone went to prison but bill and hillary. shortly after he began working in the foundation.as for lynch she was part of the law firm that took care of the clintons this law firm was also the ones who did the patent on the now famous program that wiped hillarys computer. coincidence I think not they were on their pay roll then and still are.


one thing the clintons are afraid of is if trump win he will go after both of them and that will d**g the daughter into it because she is complicit with whats going on

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:24:39   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
JMHO wrote:
If it was all above board, why are there so many pissed off FBI career types? They think there was plenty there for an indictment.


Have you ever had a job where everyone agreed with every decision made in lock step? Heck, I worked with a guy that used get pissed off at the janitorial staff, because they didn't empty his garbage every day.

So, I'll repeat myself as I've said many times:

1. She's guilty, ....but so is everyone else-EVERYONE. The last person to steal a cookie from the cookie jar isn't anymore guilty or less guilty, just no reasonable person would punish the last person. It accomplishes nothing.

2. Go after her staff and her lawyers, make them go broke and ruin their lives. Why, no one else will work for her again. No more cover ups, what will she do?

3. If she wins the oval office, which seems fairly likely, because no one is brave enough in this country to ACTUALLY walk away from either party, she will be protected the entire time while she is in office. Thus any real evidence will be gone, forgotten or covered up. She will destroy anyone else that doesn't agree with her. More than likely, she'll die in office anyways-either way.

None of this is in an effort to protect her, I'm not v****g for her. I don't think she will make a good president...mainly because she feels entitled to be president. Just because your the CEO's executive secretary doesn't qualify you to be CEO.

Anyhow, hope that clarifies the ridiculous efforts people are making driving a car backwards.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:32:37   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
bmac32 wrote:
Very little money would have been spent if she had come clean on day one but she knew damn well she had broken the law!


Could you provide the LAW that says that she can't have a private server?

She did come clean, she said she wasn't guilty, and pleaded the fifth. Just like you are legally able to do.

Are you familiar with the constitution?

Don't take any of my remarks as defensive, I'm just tired of the way this has been handled...and the reason it's been handled so badly is that she is the only one that's been caught, they all do it. Colin Powell told her how to do it. Technically she didn't break the law because there is no law against it.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:32:53   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Dummy Boy wrote:
He defended a position, which was...

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

He didn't tell the D of J to not prosecute, just that no evidence to move forward. He made a recommendation. Enough money has already been spent. They should convict her staff, her lawyer...thus, next time she won't have anyone to come to her rescue.


Read in entirety:
http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system
He defended a position, which was... br br b Alt... (show quote)


The FBI does not make decisions about intent or even give opinion about what prosecutors might or might not do.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:33:27   #
Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan
 
bggamers wrote:
one thing the clintons are afraid of is if trump win he will go after both of them and that will d**g the daughter into it because she is complicit with whats going on


tRump is credible witness....Hahahahahahahaha

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:36:55   #
Airforceone
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Since when does a FBI official make a decision to indict or not to indict? They investigate, analyse and yield their findings to prosecutors. They do NOT make decisions regarding indictment. But Comey got to?

BIL worked his magic on this one. He called in a few favors, for sure. Manipulated some key people.

Wow.


Just wake up to the fact that these emails meant no intent. It's just a bunch of out of touch h**e filled evangelicals hell bent on creating a white society. Your destroying the Republican Party. Go form your own party and call it the evangelical right wing and stop calling yourselves republicans. Your whole party is based on h**e, r****m and stupid conspiracy theories and 70% of this country is now disgusted with you people. Go away and form your own party and stop calling yourselves conservatives. Your just a group of right wing h**ers.

Reply
Oct 13, 2016 16:45:53   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
It's not the server but the information on that server that's the problem. You know it and I know it but she feels she's above the laws!



Dummy Boy wrote:
Could you provide the LAW that says that she can't have a private server?

She did come clean, she said she wasn't guilty, and pleaded the fifth. Just like you are legally able to do.

Are you familiar with the constitution?

Don't take any of my remarks as defensive, I'm just tired of the way this has been handled...and the reason it's been handled so badly is that she is the only one that's been caught, they all do it. Colin Powell told her how to do it. Technically she didn't break the law because there is no law against it.
Could you provide the LAW that says that she can't... (show quote)

Reply
Page 1 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.