MsCentralia

So very true.

Little Ball of Hate

How is that a reason to v**e for her?

MsCentralia

The first "good sound reason" is Trump. The second is she is not Trump. The third is that she will never be like Trump. Anything else?

Little Ball of Hate

Those are not reasons. They are excuses. What has Hillary done to deserve my v**e? Name one thing. You can't.

MsCentralia

One thing? She is not Trump, lol. You appear to not get how toxic and thoroughly awful is Trump. If you did, Trump is the one sound reason to v**e for Hillary. To deserve your v**e? She is not a misogynist, xenophobic, r****t, narcissist, bent on dividing this nation into Black and White. And she has cute dresses.

Little Ball of Hate

You're an i***t. But you already knew that. Sucks to be you. I would explain, but I've already wasted too much of my valuable time responding to you

Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon

Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...

Actually, Hillary Clinton IS misogynist, xenophobic, r****t and narcissistic, whereas Donald Trump does not conform to any of these descriptive adjectives.

Mr. Trump is neither awful or toxic. He is a proud, loyal, patriotic, brash, New York born American.

Barack Obama, with Hillary Clintons enthusiastic assistance, has continued and intensified the division of this nation grouped into armed camps, by ethnicities of race, religion, language, culture, and national allegiance, that was promoted during Bill Clintons presidency.

It is a pitiful thing , when after thirty years of feeding at the public trough, Hillary Clinton is forced to base her request for the support of the American citizens, not on anything she has accomplished for this nation or for its citizens, but on the fallacious claim that her opponent is somehow worse than she...

Hillary Clinton is a paranoid, pathological liar. She is full of hatred for loyal, religious and/or patriotic Americans, or anyone who disagrees with her reasoning on any subject.

She is more than partially responsible for the Arab spring that brought down Mubarak and Gadaffi, and she back channeled military supplies from Libya to rebels in Syria ultimately creating ISIS from a weak terrorist branch called al-Qaeda in Iraq.

Her muddled and inane judgement resulted in the chaos now prevalent throughout the Middle East.

Hillary Clinton and Huma Abiden, her personal assistant and lesbian lover, have just celebrated their 20th year of togetherness.

The greatest gift the United States could possibly bestow upon them would be Hillarys permanent retirement from her abuse of the public trust, and being moved out of the public eye.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

Yeah, I've read that series of conservative bloggers patting themselves on the back. The article originated, I believe, on 'Conservative Colloquium: An Intellectual Forum for All Things Conservative' Still, thanks for your effort. I don't buy into either group's claims of moral superiority. Just to prove a point, try the following from another, non-conservative blogging site. I put no more confidence in its claims than that of yours. Each have some t***hs. But, as I've said before, people will go with what they choose to believe.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"Neither side is perfect, but nowadays, are Progressives/Liberals more honest than Conservatives?

Yes, absolutely.

If you encounter a person who holds a philosophy, and that "philosophy" has been distorted to promote falsehoods, misconceptions, personal attacks and r****m in multiple areas to "make its case", then that "side" is morally weaker than another side that has a philosophy built on arguments that are more consistently fact-based and less-dependent on evoking prejudices/bigotry to reinforce their "arguments."

Neither side is perfect, but it is empirical that Conservatism in America relies, far far more than Progressivism/Liberalism, on anti-science (climate and pro-d******nist arguments), r****m/classism (h**e-talk radio, dog whistle-attacks against minorities, entitlement programs, etc), extreme over-exaggerations (B******i, Whitewater, Clinton rumors, non-existent WMDs, lies about ACA), etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.

With false arguments being an institutionalized bedrock of seemingly most Conservative tactics these days, I believe this has a mass-effect of gradually converting a large population of people (US Conservatives) into less-honest people, day-by-day, issue-by-issue, lie-by-lie, distortion-by-distortion. And their pit seems to be getting ever deeper as time passes.

While either side can be stupid (or miss the point of a particular argument), there is no Progressive/Liberal equivalent for the lies, deception and nonstop use of bigotry and non-rational h**eful emotion that is standard procedure for Conservatives/GOP supporters, all the time, every day, week after week, month after month, year after year.

There just isn't."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Coming from a ideologically eclectic family background, I have surmised that neither side of the aisle has a dominance over the other with regards to the t***h. There are equal numbers of good and honest people possessed of both conservative and liberal thought.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

If she was then she wouldn't be a lying,corrupt pig like she is now.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

Well at least you have a sense of humor.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

maureenthannon

For the last 30 years, when the government can't pay their bills, they l**t the Social Security Trust Fund. They've taken about a trillion dollars so far. The Social Security Trust Fund is now broke. President Reagan warned that this would happen if they raided it, but the Democratic Congress claimed that hr was fear mongering. What are the senior citizens and disabled Americans going to do when their Social Security checks bounce?To make the situation worse, President Obama signed a Totalization Agreement, promising to pay the i******s and their relatives Social Security. We'll be sending money, that we don't have,to Mexicans and Canadian, but screwing the Americans who have paid premiums all their working lives and depend on it to live. Any one surprised?

Yochanan.

We could find no/nather, sane reason, to v**e for "the Clintons" (two for one), that reasoning took a milisecond. They-two for one, have left a trail, unveiling a pattern, leading to a "culture of corruption" Involved with the numerous scandals that continue to plague the current administration, of which 'they-two for one', were working in unison to l***h their parasitic wiles from the American people. From the first, "fast and furious", illegal arms sales, whether Mexico on the border; or "B******i", leaving Clinton (remember the 3am phone call she would answer?!)in charge and four brave Americans murdered, perpetuating the lie(video caused uprising); and where was the President?), with Turkey's implicit involvement (more arms deals), later the President waging his own war against Libya(w/o Congress' consent), allowing more arms in the hands of terrorists; Veterans Administration, inundated with 'bureaucratic bloodsuckers", who care nothing for our brave hero's, dying while waiting in lines; IRS targeting of "perceived enemies/conservatives"; Solyndra g***n e****y funding by US taxpayers dollars, ending in bankruptcy; ad on infinum! 'They-two for one', want 'open borders' w/o any vetting process, allowing:terrorists, Sharia Law to run rampant in our society, where women's rights are consistently violated, with 'honor k*****gs'(murder for being raped). We are hard pressed to find any reason to even v**e for 'them-two for one'! No, we haven't had enough of THE EMAILS! Wikileaks just keep coming and coming,etc., involving many more of 'their-two for one', scandalous activities! Almost every part of our free society, is R****D, News Media and many Repub. insiders included!

TRUMP is the only capable NON INSIDER THAT IS CAPABLE of fixing the SYSTEM.

Little Ball of Hate

I can't help but notice that you made several accusations about Conservatives that just aren't true. I provided evidence from several polls, where the participants answered questions about moral behavior. Poll after poll shows that liberals are more dishonest. You can dismiss a single poll, but there were many polls. Then, there is moral relativism to consider. The left excels at this. They practically invented it. Once again, i'm not saying that all Conservatives are honest and all liberals are dishonest. But the evidence shows that liberals are more dishonest. And this is a result of their political ideology. Good grief! They believe it's OK for the Federal government to steal money from hard working Americans and give it to someone else! And they don't even have to be Americans. Now they want to give to i*****l a***ns! Such a practice is commonly known as theft. It's also unconstitutional, since it is not one of the powers granted to our government. The only thing you can call it is theft.

slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas

I can't help but notice that you disregard my opening comments in the post, LBOH, and also the closing comments...as I personally made no accusations. You chose to overlook the fact that the article posted, as I explained, is an example (just as yours is) of a biased and agenda-driven attempt to verify/justify a chosen ideology or world-view...written by someone else (notice the quotation marks?). The point that you seemed to miss is that such articles do not verify anything other than what, initially, the writer sought to prove with selectively chosen sources...amounting to little more than confirmation bias.

The article was no more of my words than the one you posted was of yours. The clear difference is: I made a point of recognizing the legitimacy of both liberal & conservative input, while you seem to reject anything that stretches a mind that is closed to all but the limits of rigid conservatism. A closed mind is a terrible thing to waste, my friend.