JMHO Loc: Utah

I thought Hillary made a real telling and dangerous statement when she was explaining what she was looking for in a SCOTUS nominee. She stated that she wanted a SCOTUS to get rid of 'Citizens United'! To me that would mean the destruction of the First Amendment for any conservative organization...the same type of discrimination the IRS uses against conservative orgs. If it wasn't for Citizens United Hillary's illegal private unsecured email server would not be known. Citizens United is all about t***sparency in government and holding office holders responsible for their actions, going after both sides. L*****ts don't like Citizens United because it exposes their hypocrisy and corruption.

Richard94611

Dear Times Reader,

He lied about a sex tape.
He lied about his lies about ‘birtherism.’
He lied about the growth rate of the American economy.
He lied about the state of the job market.
He lied about the trade deficit.
He lied about tax rates.
He lied about his own position on the Iraq War, again.
He lied about ISIS.
He lied about the B******i attack.
He lied about the war in Syria.
He lied about Syrian refugees.
He lied about Russia’s hacking.
He lied about the San Bernardino terrorist attack.
He lied about Hillary Clinton’s tax plan.
He lied about her health care plan.
He lied about her immigration plan.
He lied about her email deletion.
He lied about Obamacare, more than once.
He lied about the rape of a 12-year-old girl.
He lied about his history of groping women without their consent.
Finally, he broke with basic democratic norms and called on his political opponent to be jailed — because, in large part, of what he described as her dishonesty.
This is the second time I’ve summarized a p**********l debate by listing Donald Trump’s unt***hs, and there’s a reason. The country has never had a p**********l candidate who lies the way that he does – relentlessly.
Yes, virtually every politician, including Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Mitt Romney and George W. Bush, strays from the t***h at times. To be fair, virtually every human being does. But Trump is fundamentally different.
His gamble is plain enough: He believes he can fool a lot of the American people a lot of the time. He has decided that lying pays.
It’s up to the rest of us to show him otherwise.
What I’m reading: As you know if you've been reading this newsletter, I'm sometimes critical of my own profession. The media is far from perfect, and we should grapple with our shortcomings.
This morning, however, I want to salute my peers – at Politico, Politifact, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, NPR, The New York Times and many other places – who have answered Trump’s fabrications with facts. I encourage all of you to dig into the links above.
The full Opinion report from The Times follows, including Maureen Dowd, Roxane Gay, Viet Thanh Nguyen, Andy Rosenthal, Will Wilkinson and others on the debate.
David Leonhardt
Op-Ed Columnist

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

She would also want SCOTUS judges that would do away with the Second Amendment. It should be no surprise to anyone that she did NOT even mention the U.S. Constitution when describing what she would look for in a Supreme Court Judge.

Richard94611

If any of the people asking questions mentioned the Supreme Court, I missed it. I admit I had to leave the TV for about ten minutes, but I still don't think anything was said about the Supreme Court.

JMHO Loc: Utah

A lot of bulls**t and l*****t lies in that, pal.

JMHO Loc: Utah

You missed it, pal. The question that was asked, while you were in the can or wh**ever, was to both candidates and what they would look for in a SCOTUS nominee.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

No one lies better or more often than Hillary. Leonhardt is a typical "progressive shill" that lists every other progressive/lib person and organization as proof of his own credibility. The fact that he won a Pulitzer Prize for "commentary" should attest to his liberal bias.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

The question was.. What would you look for in a Supreme Court Judge..

When answering, Trump mentioned the Constitution... Hillary did NOT!

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

I do hope you're being paid well, otherwise, you're not cashing in on Citizens United. Why should the oligarchs be the ONLY beneficiaries?

JMHO Loc: Utah

Your typical stupid comment...sigh.

bilordinary Loc: SW Washington

She is not a proficient liar she is a prolific liar.
A big difference. It isn't hard to determine when she is lying!

JMHO Loc: Utah

S. Maturin

And there ya have it- the entire brain box of progressive thinking... 'IT'S A LIE!' 'IT'S A LIE!' 'IT'S A LIE!' 'IT'S A LIE!'


All the while it's the progressives who cannot do anything BUT lie, lie, lie.

pftspd

JMHO. You are so correct, but.. it is a waste of time and energy to debate MOST of those here on this site; the vast majority here being Fabian Sociolist, C*******ts, sex perverts, Clinical Sociopaths/Psychotics, AND just plain STUPID. I find comfort in my ability to read what I DO read here for what most of this is; the vast, vast majority who pen here, share their opines, are essentially meaningless. Many of the women who frequent the site, and offer opinions, are pitiful. Most have just taken one of their three of four daily doses of some anti-depressant drug to which they are addicted, and many, as much as 30% of the total female population, tho they are married, are lining up their day later in the afternoon, to meet up with their lesbian lover for what they prefer, and most enjoy, "that" intimate excess.. Just as Hillary and Huma do, regularly. Incidentally, anybody notice or observed how during the past two weeks, Huma has been kept out of the picture, for a change?? Why? (rhetorical question) So, what we have here, ladies and gentlemen, is an upcoming e******n that will be determined by female drug addicts, linked together by their vagina, and "this", the final nail in the coffin, will be neatly driven by the women. SICK. Crippled, Perverted. Drug addicts. AND.. STUPID.

pftspd

MATURIN.. YOU ARE TOTALLY CORRECT!!!!