63 Percent Chance Weather Predictors Are Skeptics on G****l W*****g: A new survey from the American Meteorological Society contains more bad news for g****l w*****g alarmist: people...

OldSchool Loc: Moving to the Red State of Utah soon!

A new survey from the American Meteorological Society contains more bad news for g****l w*****g alarmist: people who actually get paid for accurately predicting weather are increasingly skeptical about whether g****l w*****g is man-made or natural or whether g****l w*****g is occurring at all.

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2013/11/25/meteorologists-bail-on-global-warming-n1752592

Comment Loc: California

OldSchool wrote:

A new survey from the American Meteorological Society contains more bad news for g****l w*****g alarmist: people who actually get paid for accurately predicting weather are increasingly skeptical about whether g****l w*****g is man-made or natural or whether g****l w*****g is occurring at all.

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2013/11/25/meteorologists-bail-on-global-warming-n1752592

All the while we have a president who is destroying the economy because heeeee believeeees it! Just you wait and see what he has in store for you.

shabby

Billhuggins wrote:

All the while we have a president who is destroying the economy because heeeee believeeees it! Just you wait and see what he has in store for you.

I think it is a money maker that is all. Does anyone know about HAARP which is some kind of weather manipulator?
I do not believe in g****l w*****g. Business's created in
name only to get large amounts of money and then go bankrupt.

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

shabby wrote:

I think it is a money maker that is all. Does anyone know about HAARP which is some kind of weather manipulator?
I do not believe in g****l w*****g. Business's created in
name only to get large amounts of money and then go bankrupt.

The majority of meteorologists have never subscribed to the theory of g****l w*****g. We are only slightly above 1 degree F above where it was at the beginning of the 20th century. Yet all we get is yip yip yip from the Eco terrorists.

Yes, some day f****l f**ls will become scarce and the sooner we develope new technologies the better. Like shale oil when it becomes economically viable we can then slowly move over to other means of running our world.

JerryMac

I guess the C02 scare didn't work so they now have this

http://news.yahoo.com/study-us-spewing-50-more-methane-epa-says-201454426.html

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

OldSchool wrote:

A new survey from the American Meteorological Society contains more bad news for g****l w*****g alarmist: people who actually get paid for accurately predicting weather are increasingly skeptical about whether g****l w*****g is man-made or natural or whether g****l w*****g is occurring at all.

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2013/11/25/meteorologists-bail-on-global-warming-n1752592

These people are not qualified to make statements like that. That's like a radiologist making statements that football helmets don't prevent head injuries. Their specialty is related but not directly involved.

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

lpnmajor wrote:

These people are not qualified to make statements like that. That's like a radiologist making statements that football helmets don't prevent head injuries. Their specialty is related but not directly involved.

Really they study weather every day of their lives, they can punch numbers into their computers just as easily as a climatologist can. They don't see any changes in overall global temperatures.

Give me deep sea temp changes that reflect what they the fear mongers are saying and then we can talk.

rumitoid

OldSchool wrote:

A new survey from the American Meteorological Society contains more bad news for g****l w*****g alarmist: people who actually get paid for accurately predicting weather are increasingly skeptical about whether g****l w*****g is man-made or natural or whether g****l w*****g is occurring at all.

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2013/11/25/meteorologists-bail-on-global-warming-n1752592

The lack of sunspot activity may actually bring a mini-ice-age, as it did back in 1650 to 1715.

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

rumitoid wrote:

The lack of sunspot activity may actually bring a mini-ice-age, as it did back in 1650 to 1715.

I wonder how many climatologists actually look at the suns energy out put when calculating their projections.

Donmac Loc: Lincoln, RI

Princeton has great professors and they are knowledgeable beyond Obama and Gore. One such person (name unknown) has studied the climate and weather all of his 75 years sums up the reason for all this nonsense. MONEY.

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

Donmac wrote:

Princeton has great professors and they are knowledgeable beyond Obama and Gore. One such person (name unknown) has studied the climate and weather all of his 75 years sums up the reason for all this nonsense. MONEY.

Well I did find an article about a program called TCTE, a satellite launched in 2003 and a second one launched just a couple of weeks ago by NOAA to measure solar output. The article did not mention how this data was being used only that all of it was being shared with any scientists who wished to study it.

We all of course know c*****e c****e exists for a whole host of reasons but when it comes to some of the most radical changes like the change in the earths rotational axis places like even the sahari desert become lush grass lands. This has happened atleast 3 times in the past 100,000 years with the last one ending just a few thousand years ago.

I doubd very much climatologists are taking enough of these known long term ciclicilar conditions into account when predicting future w*****r p*****ns.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

OldSchool wrote:

A new survey from the American Meteorological Society contains more bad news for g****l w*****g alarmist: people who actually get paid for accurately predicting weather are increasingly skeptical about whether g****l w*****g is man-made or natural or whether g****l w*****g is occurring at all.

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2013/11/25/meteorologists-bail-on-global-warming-n1752592

I like the 8th or 9th paragraph, it says the more educated the more likely to accept g****l w*****g...nice piece..should read it with an open view..

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Constitutional libertarian wrote:

The majority of meteorologists have never subscribed to the theory of g****l w*****g. We are only slightly above 1 degree F above where it was at the beginning of the 20th century. Yet all we get is yip yip yip from the Eco terrorists.

Yes, some day f****l f**ls will become scarce and the sooner we develope new technologies the better. Like shale oil when it becomes economically viable we can then slowly move over to other means of running our world.

What is the part that is so much trouble to everyone..That c*****e c****e is man-made or c*****e c****e is happening at all??

Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way

permafrost wrote:

What is the part that is so much trouble to everyone..That c*****e c****e is man-made or c*****e c****e is happening at all??

I think the problem is that certain people say the evidence is conclusive that g****l w*****g is happening and human's are the direct cause of it. Even they admit that the planet isn't warming any where's near what their models were predicted.

Go to let's say green peace's web sight and they say just a little over 1 degree F increase in the past hundred years.

Do we need to weene ourselves off f****l f**ls well yes but stop all of the fear tactics.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

We have so much evidence that the climate is changing..I don`t have room, or knowledge to list much of it..Ice cores from both Antarctica and Greenland icecap both show temperature changes in the past, but not as fast or strong as in recent decades..7 of the hottest 10 summers have been in the last 12 yrs or so...contrary to what seems correct, a global temperature increase of 1 degree Fahrenheit is a big deal..ocean temperatures are monitored, both surface and deep water..we have had a quite active sunspot surge in recent years..Climate study seems to get more complicated the harder they look..I believe that the climate is changing and is/will be an serious problem...How much, if any can be attributed to mankind development I can not say, but do think that wh**ever little modification we could do to slow it down or modify the trend can do no harm and everyone should consider learning what they can and follow their own conclusions..