One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Drug testing for welfare applicants started by NC.
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Sep 25, 2016 08:13:41   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Is it a good thing? You decide.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article59389341.html

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 08:20:00   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
It depends on what you do when someone tests positive.

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 08:28:16   #
Mom8052 Loc: Lost in the mountains of New Mexico
 
Super Dave wrote:
It depends on what you do when someone tests positive.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UH Dave,did you even read the article? They lost their benefits, unless children were involved. I'm sure the kids were tested to, as the residue from druggies pot or anything lingers in a home. Kids probably removed into child custody until folks cleaned up.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2016 08:33:08   #
sweetlips
 
we don't need tax payer funded drug addicts , if they like drugs better than food, so be it, cut them off

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 08:42:58   #
mcmlx
 
Mom8052 wrote:
Is it a good thing? You decide.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article59389341.html



Why didn't NC test everyone?
Screening is not testing. It's up to the screener to decide who gets tested. Screeners are as dirty as the screenees.
I can see it clearly, "Here's a gram of coke, and an ounce of pot to keep me off the list."
Unless everyone is tested, 21 people out of 89 aren't going to make a big difference.
7900 screened. 89 tested.
Bulls**t.
I am for everyone tested.

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 08:44:12   #
Kevyn
 
Mom8052 wrote:
Is it a good thing? You decide.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article59389341.html
I think it is a great idea as long as it applies to the board of directors and management of every business and corporation that receives any form of corporate Wellfare including tax credits, incentives and taxpayer funded infastructure. Of course they would need to go to then same facility and go through the same testing procedure as the other Wellfare recipients. And be cut off from all benefits if they fail. We would save millions and with the corporate Wellfare drug tests and unlike testing individuals the results would not take food from the table of one poor child.

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 08:50:38   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
mcmlx wrote:
Why didn't NC test everyone?
Screening is not testing. It's up to the screener to decide who gets tested. Screeners are as dirty as the screenees.
I can see it clearly, "Here's a gram of coke, and an ounce of pot to keep me off the list."
Unless everyone is tested, 21 people out of 89 aren't going to make a big difference.
7900 screened. 89 tested.
Bulls**t.
I am for everyone tested.











Yea, it may end-up, mcm, like the NSA Muslim searching the Catholic nun at Kennedy Airport for weapons while allowing the fully-robed, young {"Jihadists"?} to saunter on by!!! It seems in this day-and-age, the criminals are trying to arrest {or k**l} the "PIGS;" right - sorry, "left" from the top!!! Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2016 09:02:13   #
okie don
 
Kevyn wrote:
I think it is a great idea as long as it applies to the bord of directors and management of every business and corporation that receives any form of corporate Wellfare including tax credits, incentives and taxpayer funded infastructure. Of course they would need to go to then same facility and go through the same testing procedure as the other Wellfare recipients. And be cut off from all benefits if they fail. We would save millions and with the corporate Wellfare drug tests and unlike testing individuals the results would not take food from the table of one poor child.
I think it is a great idea as long as it applies t... (show quote)

Can't do that.
All the 'eliets' would flunk from CIA Coke. You dummy...

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 09:05:20   #
mcmlx
 
Kevyn wrote:
I think it is a great idea as long as it applies to the bord of directors and management of every business and corporation that receives any form of corporate Wellfare including tax credits, incentives and taxpayer funded infastructure. Of course they would need to go to then same facility and go through the same testing procedure as the other Wellfare recipients. And be cut off from all benefits if they fail. We would save millions and with the corporate Wellfare drug tests and unlike testing individuals the results would not take food from the table of one poor child.
I think it is a great idea as long as it applies t... (show quote)


Good idea, however
that steps on too many toes, kev. The directors and managers make the rules and would never go for that.
We are bamboozled at every point. We, the people, need to see how much is spent on welfare. If testing and proving saves $$, show us where the "extra" $$ saved is being spent.
It's a pipe dream. Too many cooks in the kitchen.
I can predict where the $$ "saved" will go.
It will line the pockets of our elected officials who supposedly hired to look after our concerns.

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 09:15:35   #
mcmlx
 
okie don wrote:
Can't do that.
All the 'eliets' would flunk from CIA Coke. You dummy...


Does Air America ring a bell?

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 11:21:32   #
okie don
 
Yep, your on the track...
Doe's Mena Arkansas ring a bell. boooooong

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2016 11:33:43   #
mcmlx
 
okie don wrote:
Yep, your on the track...
Doe's Mena Arkansas ring a bell. boooooong


Seems like the names Bush and Clinton come to mind.

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 11:40:58   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
okie don wrote:
Can't do that.
All the 'eliets' would flunk from CIA Coke. You dummy...


So would many of the legislators of our great state.

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 12:18:27   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
It about dam time. A drug user is a scourge on Society Let them live a life of misery, they make life miserable for others. Many will say I am an ass hole for my view, You know what I say to them FUCK YOU / They had a choice, too stupid to make the right one.
Mom8052 wrote:
Is it a good thing? You decide.

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article59389341.html

Reply
Sep 25, 2016 12:21:45   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
Get it through your head Drug user don't care about their family's If they did would not be on them
Kevyn wrote:
I think it is a great idea as long as it applies to the board of directors and management of every business and corporation that receives any form of corporate Wellfare including tax credits, incentives and taxpayer funded infastructure. Of course they would need to go to then same facility and go through the same testing procedure as the other Wellfare recipients. And be cut off from all benefits if they fail. We would save millions and with the corporate Wellfare drug tests and unlike testing individuals the results would not take food from the table of one poor child.
I think it is a great idea as long as it applies t... (show quote)

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.