Australian Gun Laws have worked! I can provide at least five posts proving this fact: but if you are a gun enthusiast and just disbelieve me, just google Australian Gun Laws 2015 and...

tommymore

I can provide at least five posts proving this fact: but if you are a gun enthusiast and just disbelieve me, just google Australian Gun Laws 2015 and read all the articles. Yet here is the problem on the Right: they disbelieve anything contrary to what they believe. Facts that go counter to their ideology are Left Wing media manipulations. A total safe zone from reality that ensures their views. Australia's gun laws are a success? Has to be a lie despite all government evidence and statistics (probably contrived by the One World Order) to the contrary. Believe a right wing extremist blog before all documented evidence? Lewis Carroll could not have imagined such a "down the rabbit hole" world.

tommymore

Read this instead of Right Wing propaganda:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/23/what-happened-after-australia-banned-lots-of-guns-after-a-massacre/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/world/us-australia-gun-control/index.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/world/australia/australia-gun-ban-shooting.html?_r=0

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

tommymore wrote:

Read this instead of Right Wing propaganda:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/23/what-happened-after-australia-banned-lots-of-guns-after-a-massacre/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/world/us-australia-gun-control/index.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/world/australia/australia-gun-ban-shooting.html?_r=0

Wash. Post, CNN, NY Times. Three very liberal entities. Won't read. Don't care. Australia can do what they want. They won't let Muslim refugees in their country. You ok with that? Troll somewhere else.

tommymore

JFlorio wrote:

Wash. Post, CNN, NY Times. Three very liberal entities. Won't read. Don't care. Australia can do what they want. They won't let Muslim refugees in their country. You ok with that? Troll somewhere else.

As I said, you refuse evidence based on your opinion of Post, CNN, NY Times. Incestuous ideology. Thank you for proving my point.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

tommymore wrote:

Read this instead of Right Wing propaganda:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/23/what-happened-after-australia-banned-lots-of-guns-after-a-massacre/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/world/us-australia-gun-control/index.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/world/australia/australia-gun-ban-shooting.html?_r=0

Read left wing propaganda instead, right? Sheeee it.

There are some facts that you are ignoring. The population of Australia is 23 million, which is about 7.5% of the US population. The greatest majority of Australians live in the coastal cities or very close by. If you are suggesting that Australia should be the model for gun bans in America, you are sadly mistaken.

Crime Prevention Research Center: Murder and homicide rates before and after gun bans

CPRC testimony on gun control before the Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee (Audio of testimony included)

tommymore

Blade_Runner wrote:

Read left wing propaganda instead, right? Sheeee i... (show quote)

Never said that they were. Just countering the absurd Right Wing claims in this country that their gun laws did not work--for them!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

tommymore wrote:

As I said, you refuse evidence based on your opinion of Post, CNN, NY Times. Incestuous ideology. Thank you for proving my point.

You have a reading comprehension problem? Didn't refuse any evidence. I don't care is not the same as I don't believe. Damn you dumb.

JW

tommymore wrote:

Read this instead of Right Wing propaganda:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/23/what-happened-after-australia-banned-lots-of-guns-after-a-massacre/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/world/us-australia-gun-control/index.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/world/australia/australia-gun-ban-shooting.html?_r=0

I read your first link and if the other two are similar, and I assume since they are working from the same data with the same spin in mind, they likely are similar.

If YOU read the article, you learned the gun ban made no statistically significant change in the homicide rate. You also discovered that some proponents declared the homicide study "deeply flawed" because it showed no significant change. So, if they don't like the conclusion, it must be a bad study. Replace it with one better biased.

The only unopposed result was a decline in the suicide rate. Why would the Left oppose suicide by gun when they are constantly promoting euthanasia and doctor assisted suicides, not to mention supporting and promoting a******n.

The best that Australia has been able to do, per your article, is speculate that an advantage to the public has come about.

tommymore

JW wrote:

I read your first link and if the other two are si... (show quote)

LOL. Assisted suicide for the terminally ill is significantly different than mentally ill patients "offing themselves." You guys are so extremely dense. Just equating these as the same shows your stupendous ignorance.

tommymore

JFlorio wrote:

You have a reading comprehension problem? Didn't refuse any evidence. I don't care is not the same as I don't believe. Damn you dumb.

Fine.

kenjay Loc: Arkansas

tommymore wrote:

As I said, you refuse evidence based on your opinion of Post, CNN, NY Times. Incestuous ideology. Thank you for proving my point.

Not our fault your sources have incestuous ideology pick better in the future.

Little Ball of Hate

tommymore wrote:

I can provide at least five posts proving this fac... (show quote)

It's pretty awesome, being right. You should try it sometime.

tommymore

JW wrote:

I read your first link and if the other two are si... (show quote)

All that from one link out of three? And a significant decrease in suicide is of no account? God forbid speculate these gun laws have been advantageous to the public, because they have? How crazy!

THUNDERBOLT

Just a thought.
Australian population.
90% White
6% Asian
2% Aboriginees (They live in the middle of NOWHERE)
2% All others
I think you know where I am going with this.
ThunderBolt

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

THUNDERBOLT wrote:

Just a thought.
Australian population.
90% White
6% Asian
2% Aboriginees (They live in the middle of NOWHERE)
2% All others
I think you know where I am going with this.
ThunderBolt

In other words if we kept all the guns and confiscated the black thugs our homicide rate would drop.